Abstract
We perform a global fit within the pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter (DM) model emerging from an additional complex scalar singlet with a softly broken global U (1) symmetry. Leading to a momentum-suppressed DM-nucleon cross section at tree level, the model provides a natural explanation for the null results from direct detection experiments. Our global fit combines constraints from perturbative unitarity, DM relic abundance, Higgs invisible decay, electroweak precision observables and latest Higgs searches at colliders. The results are presented in both frequentist and Bayesian statisical frameworks. Furthermore, post-processing our samples, we include the likelihood from gamma-ray observations of Fermi -LAT dwarf spheroidal galaxies and compute the one-loop DM-nucleon cross section. We find two favoured regions characterised by their dominant annihilation channel: the Higgs funnel and annihilation into Higgs pairs. Both are compatible with current Fermi -LAT observations, and furthermore, can fit the slight excess observed in four dwarfs in a mass range between about 30–300 GeV. While the former region is hard to probe experimentally, the latter can partly be tested by current observations of cosmic-ray antiprotons as well as future gamma-ray observations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Silk et al., Particle dark matter: observations, models and searches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2010).
LUX collaboration, Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 021303 [arXiv:1608.07648] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, Dark matter results from 54-ton-day exposure of PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 181302 [arXiv:1708.06917] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977) 1440 [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev.D 16 (1977) 1791 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223 [INSPIRE].
F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 279 [INSPIRE].
S. Dodelson and L.M. Widrow, Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (1994) 17 [hep-ph/9303287] [INSPIRE].
X.-D. Shi and G.M. Fuller, A new dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.82 (1999) 2832 [astro-ph/9810076] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, F. Kling, S. Su and Y. Wu, Unblinding the dark matter blind spots, JHEP02 (2017) 057 [arXiv:1612.02387] [INSPIRE].
A. Choudhury et al., Blind spots for direct detection with simplified DM models and the LHC, Universe3 (2017) 41 [arXiv:1705.04230] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, H. Liu, S. Mukhopadhyay and X. Wang, Dark matter blind spots at one-loop, JHEP03 (2019) 080 [arXiv:1810.04679] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, B. Maddock and S. Profumo, Doubly blind spots in scalar dark matter models, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 055033 [arXiv:1907.01726] [INSPIRE].
Q.-F. Xiang, X.-J. Bi, P.-F. Yin and Z.-H. Yu, Exploring Fermionic dark matter via Higgs boson precision measurements at the circular electron positron collider, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 055004 [arXiv:1707.03094] [INSPIRE].
J.-W. Wang et al., Exploring triplet-quadruplet fermionic dark matter at the LHC and future colliders, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 035021 [arXiv:1711.05622] [INSPIRE].
J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP11 (2010) 042 [arXiv:1008.1591] [INSPIRE].
A.L. Fitzpatrick et al., The effective field theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP02 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1203.3542] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile and P. Panci, Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches, JCAP10 (2013) 019 [arXiv:1307.5955] [INSPIRE].
C. Boehm et la., Extended gamma-ray emission from Coy Dark Matter, JCAP05 (2014) 009 [arXiv:1401.6458] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, U. Haisch and F. Kahlhoefer, Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators, JHEP05 (2017) 138 [arXiv:1701.07427] [INSPIRE].
P. Tunney, J.M. No and M. Fairbairn, Probing the pseudoscalar portal to dark matter via bbZ(→ℓℓ) + /ET: from the LHC to the Galactic Center excess, Phys. Rev.D 96 (2017) 095020 [arXiv:1705.09670] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger et al., Complex singlet extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 015018 [arXiv:0811.0393] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, M. McCaskey and G. Shaughnessy, Complex scalar dark matter vis-à-vis CoGeNT, DAMA/LIBRA and XENON100, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 035019 [arXiv:1005.3328] [INSPIRE].
D. Barducci et al., Monojet searches for momentum-dependent dark matter interactions, JHEP01 (2017) 078 [arXiv:1609.07490] [INSPIRE].
C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma, Cancellation mechanism for dark-matter–nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 191801 [arXiv:1708.02253] [INSPIRE].
R. Balkin, M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Weiler, Dark matter shifts away from direct detection, JCAP11 (2018) 050 [arXiv:1809.09106] [INSPIRE].
K. Huitu et al., Probing pseudo-Goldstone dark matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 015009 [arXiv:1812.05952] [INSPIRE].
D. Karamitros, Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone dark matter: examples of vanishing direct detection cross section, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 095036 [arXiv:1901.09751] [INSPIRE].
D. Azevedo et al., One-loop contribution to dark-matter-nucleon scattering in the pseudo-scalar dark matter model, JHEP01 (2019) 138 [arXiv:1810.06105] [INSPIRE].
K. Ishiwata and T. Toma, Probing pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson dark matter at loop level, JHEP12 (2018) 089 [arXiv:1810.08139] [INSPIRE].
LUX-ZEPLIN collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev.D 101 (2020) 052002 [arXiv:1802.06039] [INSPIRE].
DARWIN collaboration, DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector, JCAP11 (2016) 017 [arXiv:1606.07001] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT, DES collaboration, Searching for dark matter annihilation in recently discovered Milky Way satellites with Fermi-LAT, Astrophys. J.834 (2017) 110 [arXiv:1611.03184] [INSPIRE].
D. Azevedo et al., Testing scalar versus vector dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 015017 [arXiv:1808.01598] [INSPIRE].
T. Alanne et al., Direct and indirect probes of Goldstone dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 075028 [arXiv:1812.05996] [INSPIRE].
X.-M. Jiang et al., Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter and two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 075011 [arXiv:1907.09684] [INSPIRE].
M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Weiler, A global view of the off-shell Higgs portal, SciPost Phys.8 (2020) 027 [arXiv:1910.04170] [INSPIRE].
S.J. Clark, B. Dutta and L.E. Strigari, Dark matter annihilation into four-body final states and implications for the AMS antiproton excess, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 023003 [arXiv:1709.07410] [INSPIRE].
K. Boddy, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia and P. Sandick, Model-independent constraints on dark matter annihilation in dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Phys. Rev.D 97 (2018) 095031 [arXiv:1802.03826] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline and T. Toma, Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter confronts cosmic ray and collider anomalies, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 035023 [arXiv:1906.02175] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike and M. Raidal, Phase transitions and gravitational wave tests of pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in the softly broken U(1) scalar singlet model, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 115010 [arXiv:1901.03333] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, K. Loos and M. Raidal, Gravitational wave signals of pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in the ℤ3complex singlet model, Phys. Rev.D 101 (2020) 035001 [arXiv:1907.13136] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul et al., FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande et al., UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].
A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun.140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev.D 16 (1977) 1519 [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and I.M. Lewis, Exploring resonant di-Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035015 [arXiv:1410.5488] [INSPIRE].
A. Beniwal, M. Lewicki, M. White and A.G. Williams, Gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis in a global study of the extended scalar singlet model, JHEP02 (2019) 183 [arXiv:1810.02380] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1807.06209 [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger et al., MicrOMEGAs5.0: freeze-in, Comput. Phys. Commun.231 (2018) 173 [arXiv:1801.03509] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible Higgs boson decays with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 231801 [arXiv:1904.05105] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced through vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett.B 793 (2019) 520 [arXiv:1809.05937] [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev.D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs singlet extension of the standard model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 104 [arXiv:1501.02234] [INSPIRE].
J. Haller et al., Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models, Eur. Phys. J.C 78 (2018) 675 [arXiv:1803.01853] [INSPIRE].
S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow, Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035018 [arXiv:1407.5342] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-5: testing Higgs sectors in the LHC 13 TeV era, in preparation.
P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-4: improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2693 [arXiv:1311.0055] [INSPIRE].
P. Bechtle et al., HiggsSignals: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2711 [arXiv:1305.1933] [INSPIRE].
F. Ambrogi et al., MadDM v.3.0: a comprehensive tool for dark matter studies, Phys. Dark Univ.24 (2019) 100249 [arXiv:1804.00044] [INSPIRE].
A. Geringer-Sameth, S.M. Koushiappas and M. Walker, Dwarf galaxy annihilation and decay emission profiles for dark matter experiments, Astrophys. J.801 (2015) 74 [arXiv:1408.0002] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Searching for dark matter annihilation from Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 231301 [arXiv:1503.02641] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
A. Geringer-Sameth et al., Indication of gamma-ray emission from the newly discovered dwarf galaxy Reticulum II, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 081101 [arXiv:1503.02320] [INSPIRE].
S. Li et al., Search for gamma-ray emission from eight dwarf spheroidal galaxy candidates discovered in Year Two of Dark Energy Survey with Fermi-LAT data, Phys. Rev.D 93 (2016) 043518 [arXiv:1511.09252] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Alarcon, J. Martin Camalich and J.A. Oller, The chiral representation of the πN scattering amplitude and the pion-nucleon sigma term, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 051503 [arXiv:1110.3797] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055025 [Erratum ibid.D 92 (2015) 039906] [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
X.-L. Ren, X.-Z. Ling and L.-S. Geng, Pion–nucleon sigma term revisited in covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Lett.B 783 (2018) 7 [arXiv:1710.07164] [INSPIRE].
G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One loop corrections for e+e−annihilation into μ+μ−in the Weinberg model, Nucl. Phys.B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200, Fortsch. Phys.41 (1993) 307 [arXiv:0709.1075] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn and M. Ṕerez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun.118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].
G.J. van Oldenborgh and J.A.M. Vermaseren, New algorithms for one loop integrals, Z. Phys.C 46 (1990) 425 [INSPIRE].
F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.398 (2009) 1601 [arXiv:0809.3437].
Y. Akrami et al., Statistical coverage for supersymmetric parameter estimation: a case study with direct detection of dark matter, JCAP07 (2011) 002 [arXiv:1011.4297] [INSPIRE].
K. Cranmer, Statistical challenges for searches for new physics at the LHC, in the proceedings of Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology (PHYSTAT 05), September 12–15, Oxford, U.K. (2005), physics/0511028 [INSPIRE].
G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J.C 71 (2011) 1554 [Erratum ibid.C 73 (2013) 2501] [arXiv:1007.1727] [INSPIRE].
GAMBIT collaboration, Comparison of statistical sampling methods with ScannerBit, the GAMBIT scanning module, Eur. Phys. J.C 77 (2017) 761 [arXiv:1705.07959] [INSPIRE].
P. Scott, Pippi — Painless parsing, post-processing and plotting of posterior and likelihood samples, Eur. Phys. J. Plus127 (2012) 138 [arXiv:1206.2245] [INSPIRE].
T. Binder, T. Bringmann, M. Gustafsson and A. Hryczuk, Early kinetic decoupling of dark matter: when the standard way of calculating the thermal relic density fails, Phys. Rev.D 96 (2017) 115010 [arXiv:1706.07433] [INSPIRE].
V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett.161B (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys.49 (2008) 71 [arXiv:0803.4089] [INSPIRE].
GAMBIT collaboration, Global analyses of Higgs portal singlet dark matter models using GAMBIT, Eur. Phys. J.C 79 (2019) 38 [arXiv:1808.10465] [INSPIRE].
LSST Dark Matter Group collaboration, Probing the fundamental nature of dark matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, arXiv:1902.01055 [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Constraining heavy dark matter with cosmic-ray antiprotons, JCAP04 (2018) 004 [arXiv:1711.05274] [INSPIRE].
T. Bringmann et al., Probing the sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to dark matter in the Galactic Center, talk given at TeV Particle Astrophysics 2018 , August 27–31, Berlin, Germany (2018).
AMS collaboration, Antiproton flux, antiproton-to-proton flux ratio and properties of elementary particle fluxes in primary cosmic rays measured with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 091103 [INSPIRE].
H. Zhan and J.A. Tyson, Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an Overview, Rept. Prog. Phys.81 (2018) 066901 [arXiv:1707.06948] [INSPIRE].
S. Ando et al., Discovery prospects of dwarf spheroidal galaxies for indirect dark matter searches, JCAP10 (2019) 040 [arXiv:1905.07128] [INSPIRE].
L. Goodenough and D. Hooper, Possible evidence for dark matter annihilation in the innerMilky Way from the Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope, arXiv:0910.2998 [INSPIRE].
D. Hooper and T. Linden, On the origin of the gamma rays from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 123005 [arXiv:1110.0006] [INSPIRE].
K.N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, Detection of a gamma-ray source in the Galactic Center consistent with extended emission from dark matter annihilation and concentrated astrophysical emission, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 083511 [Erratum ibid.D 87 (2013) 129902] [arXiv:1207.6047] [INSPIRE].
D. Hooper and T.R. Slatyer, Two emission mechanisms in the Fermi bubbles: a possible signal of annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ.2 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1302.6589] [INSPIRE].
C. Gordon and O. Macias, Dark matter and pulsar model constraints from Galactic Center Fermi-LAT gamma ray observations, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 083521 [Erratum ibid.D 89 (2014) 049901] [arXiv:1306.5725] [INSPIRE].
K.N. Abazajian, N. Canac, S. Horiuchi and M. Kaplinghat, Astrophysical and dark matter interpretations of extended gamma-ray emission from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 023526 [arXiv:1402.4090] [INSPIRE].
T. Daylan et al., The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: a case for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ.12 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1402.6703] [INSPIRE].
F. Calore, I. Cholis and C. Weniger, Background model systematics for the Fermi GeV excess, JCAP03 (2015) 038 [arXiv:1409.0042] [INSPIRE].
Fermi-LAT collaboration, Fermi-LAT observations of high-energy γ-ray emission toward the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J.819 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1511.02938] [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, M. Krämer and M. Korsmeier, Novel dark matter constraints from antiprotons in light of AMS-02, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 191102 [arXiv:1610.03071] [INSPIRE].
M.-Y. Cui, Q. Yuan, Y.-L.S. Tsai and Y.-Z. Fan, Possible dark matter annihilation signal in the AMS-02 antiproton data, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 191101 [arXiv:1610.03840] [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Probing dark matter annihilation in the Galaxy with antiprotons and gamma rays, JCAP10 (2017) 053 [arXiv:1704.08258] [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, J. Heisig, L. Klamt, M. Korsmeier and M. Krämer, Scrutinizing the evidence for dark matter in cosmic-ray antiprotons, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 103014 [arXiv:1903.01472] [INSPIRE].
I. Cholis, T. Linden and D. Hooper, A robust excess in the cosmic-ray antiproton spectrum: implications for annihilating dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 99 (2019) 103026 [arXiv:1903.02549] [INSPIRE].
A. Cuoco, B. Eiteneuer, J. Heisig and M. Krämer, A global fit of the γ-ray galactic center excess within the scalar singlet Higgs portal model, JCAP06 (2016) 050 [arXiv:1603.08228] [INSPIRE].
C. Bœhm et al., How high is the neutrino floor?, JCAP01 (2019) 043 [arXiv:1809.06385] [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O.M. Ogreid and P. Osland, The oblique parameters in multi-Higgs-doublet models, Nucl. Phys.B 801 (2008) 81 [arXiv:0802.4353] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1912.04008
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Arina, C., Beniwal, A., Degrande, C. et al. Global fit of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2020)015
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2020)015