Skip to main content
Log in

Toward an Interdisciplinary Science of Culture

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultural events are of interest to scientists working in many scientific domains. Given this, an interdisciplinary science of culture may provide a more thorough understanding of cultural phenomena. However, interdisciplinary sciences depend upon the validity and vitality of the participating disciplines. This article reviews the nature of scientific enterprises and problematic conceptualizations of interdisciplinary science from an interbehavioral perspective. Metasystemic and systemic foundations for an interdisciplinary science of culture are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BIDNEY, D. B. (1970). Theoretical anthropology (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIGLAN, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualistic framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELGADO, D., & HAYES, L. J. (2007). The acquisition of a conceptual repertoire: An analysis in terms of substitution of functions. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(3), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRYLING, M. J., & HAYES, L. J. (2009). Psychological events and constructs: An alliance with Smith. The Psychological Record, 59(1), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLENN, S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GLENN, S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 133–151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GLENN, S., & MALOTT, M. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GUERIN, B. (1994). Analyzing social behavior: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAKE, D. F. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, M. (1999). Theories of culture in postmodern times. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1999). Dining with the devil: A response to Normand, Bucklin, and Austin. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19(3), 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (2001). Finding our place in a constructed future. In L. J. Hayes, J. Austin, R. Houmanfar, & M. C. Clayton (Eds.), Organizational change (pp. 349–372). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (2004, May). Behaviorism at 100. Presidential Address, Association for Behavior Analysis, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J., & DELGADO, D. (2006). Transgenic and knockout mouse models: The problem of language. In G. Fisch & J. Flint (Eds.), Transgenic and knockout models of neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 45–68). Totowa, NJ: Humana.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J., & HOUMANFAR, R. (2004). Units & measures: A response to Glenn & Malott. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JACOB, S. (2008). Cross-disciplinarization: A new talisman for evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 29(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1923a). Concerning some faulty conceptions of social psychology. Journal of Philosophy, 20, 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1923b). What are the data and problems of social psychology? Journal of Philosophy, 20, 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1924). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Chicago: Principia Press.

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1947). Problems in physiological psychology. Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1953). The logic of modern science. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1958). Interbehavioral psychology. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1966). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vol 1). Chicago: Principia Press.

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1971). The aim and progress of psychology and other sciences. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MALAGODI, E. F., & JACKSON, K. (1989). Behavior analysis and cultural analysis: Troubles and issues. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 17–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MALOTT, M. E., & GLENN, S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OBSERVER. (1968). Psychology: An interdisciplinary science. The Psychological Record, 18, 267–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • OBSERVER. (1969a). On the reduction of psychology to physics. The Psychological Record, 19, 515–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OBSERVER. (1969b). The basis fallacy in psychology. The Psychological Record, 19, 645–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OBSERVER. (1981). Surrogation: A process in psychological evolution. The Psychological Record, 31, 459–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L. J. (1983). Defining social behavior: An exercise in scientific system building. The Psychological Record, 33, 533–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L. J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L. J. (1986a). On the difference between verbal and social behavior. In P. N. Chase & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Psychological aspects of language (pp. 91–117). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L. J. (1986b). Practices of description and the definition of verbal behavior. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 4, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSENFIELD, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Sciences & Medicine, 35, 1343–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda J. Hayes.

Additional information

This article was based in part on the first author’s presidential address to the Association for Behavior Analysis International, 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayes, L.J., Fryling, M.J. Toward an Interdisciplinary Science of Culture. Psychol Rec 59, 679–700 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395687

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395687

Keywords

Navigation