Skip to main content
Log in

Nasal spray vs oral administration of bromocriptine: Pharmacology and effect on serum prolactin in puerperal women

  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oral administration of bromocriptine induces a variety of side-effects in about 50–70% of patients, the most common being nausea and vomiting, probably related to the local gastrointestinal effect of the drug. Nasal administration makes it possible to avoid intestinal and liver metabolism. This study compared the serum concentrations of bromocriptine and prolactin (PRL) in twenty puerperal women who had asked to discontinue breast feeding and were randomized to receive a single oral (2.5 mg) or nasal spray dose (0.8 mg) of bromocriptine. Serum bromocriptine and PRL concentrations were measured at various times before and after drug administration. At 15 min, the circulating concentrations of bromocriptine were about eight times higher after nasal than after oral administration; peak serum concentration (CMax) was reached respectively 45 min and 60 min after administration, and was about three times higher after nasal administration (314±102 pg/ml vs 112.30±34.47 pg/ml). The reduction in serum PRL concentrations was also more rapid in the nasally-treated group reaching the normal assay range of < 20 µg/l within two as against five hours post-administration. Four orally-treated patients complained of nausea; in the nasally-treated group, six patients reported only a mild endonasal burning that disappeared within a few minutes of administration. Our results suggest that the nasal administration of bromocriptine may lead to a reduction in the required overall dose and fewer gastrointestinal side-effects, and may therefore improve therapy compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuellar F.G. Bromocriptine mesylate (Parlodel) in the management of amenorrhea-galactorrhea associated with hyperprolactinemia. Obstet. Gynecol. 55: 278, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friesen H., Tolis G. Use of bromocriptine in the galactorrhea-amenorrhea syndromes. The Canadian Cooperative Study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 6 (suppl): 915, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Metha A.E., Tolis G. Pharmacology of bromocriptine in health and disease. Drugs 77: 313, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schran H.F., Bhuta S.I., Schwarz H.J., Thorner M.O. The pharmacokinetics of bromocriptine in man. In: Goldstein M., Calne D., Leiberman A., Thorner M.O. (Eds), Ergot compounds and brain function: Neuroendocrine and neuropsychiatric aspects. Raven Press, New York, 1980, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Montini M., Pagani G., Gianola D., Pagani M.D., Salmoiraghi M., Ferrari L, Lancranjan I. Long-lasting suppression of prolactin secretion and rapid shrinkage of prolactinomas after a long-acting, injectable form of bromocriptine. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 63: 266, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rolland R. On ParlodeIR LAR and optimal treatment of hyperprolactinemia. In: Pepperel R.J. (Ed), New Aspects of dopamine agonist therapy in menstrual cycle disorders and infertility. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Casterton Hall, Carnforth, Lancs UK, 1990, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vermesh M., Fossum G.T., Kletzky O.A. Vaginal bromocriptine: Pharmacology and effect on serum prolactin in normal women. Obstet. Gynecol. 72: 693, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz E., Weiss B.E., Hassell A., Schran H.F., Adashi E.Y. Increased circulating levels of bromocriptine after vaginal compared with oral administration. Fertil. Steril. 55: 882, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarkar M.A. Drug metabolism in the nasal mucosa. Pharm. Res. 9: 1, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cicinelli E., Ragno G., Cagnazzo I., Fanelli F., Vetuschi C., Schonauer S. Progesterone administration by nasal spray. Fertil. Steril. 56: 139, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gopinath P.G., Gopinath R.D., Anad Kumar T.C. Target site of intranasally sprayed substances and their transport across the nasal mucosa: a new insight into intranasal route of drug delivery. Curr. Ther. Res. 23: 596, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aeilig W.H., Nuesch E. Comparative pharmacokinetic investigations with tritium-labeled ergot alkaloids after oral and intravenous administration in man. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Res. 15: 106, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenthaler J., Munzer H., Voges R. Immunoassay of bromocriptine and specificity of antibody: Criteria for choice of antiserum and marker compound. In: Reid E., Leppard J.P. (Eds), Drug metabolite isolation and determination. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1983, p. 215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Jagannadha R.A., Moudal N.R., Li C.H. Beta-Endorphin: intranasal administration increases the serum prolactin level in monkeys. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 28: 546, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faraj J.A., Hussain A.A., Aramaki Y., Iseki K., Kagoshima M., Dittert L.W. Mechanism of nasal absorption of drugs. Ill: Nasal absorption of leucine enkephalin. J. Pharm. Sci. 79: 698, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cicinelli, E., Cignarelli, M., Petruzzi, D. et al. Nasal spray vs oral administration of bromocriptine: Pharmacology and effect on serum prolactin in puerperal women. J Endocrinol Invest 19, 427–432 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03349887

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03349887

Key-words

Navigation