Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical input into designing a PACS

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical attitudes and expectations in the implementation of a neuroradiology picture archiving and communication system (PACS). A 1-page survey of expectations and clinical attitudes toward a neuroradiology mini-PACS was distributed to 49 full-time faculty members in the departments of neurosurgery, neurology, and otorhinolaryngology at an academic center. Interest in viewing soft-copy images was moderate to very high for over 89% of clinicians. All clinicians were comfortable with phone consultations with radiologists while viewing soft-copy images. Clinicians preferred retrieving images from personal computers over workstations and film libraries by 72.9%, 27.1%, and 0%, respectively. However, 38.5% of surgeons felt the need for hard copy in the operating room. Clinicians estimated that in 18.3% of cases, patients took their in-house films to outside institutions for consultations. Clinicians were enthusiastic about implementing PACS. Although acceptance of soft-copy viewing among clinicians is high, some provision for supplying hard-copy images appears to be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper F, et al: Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images. J Digit Imaging 11:149–150, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pomerantz SM, Siegel EL, Protopapas Z, et al: Experience and design recommendations for picture archiving and communication systems in the surgical setting. J Digit Imaging 9:123–130, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper F, et al: Picture archiving and communication systems and vascular surgery: Clinical impressions and suggestions for improvement. J Digit Imaging 9:167–171, 1996

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stacul F: Ultrasonography and PACS. Eur J Radiol 27:S196–199, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, et al: Radiology report times: Impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR 170:1153–1159, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kundel HL, Seshadri SB, Langlotz CP, et al: Prospective study of a PACS: Information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit. Radiology 199:143–149, 1996

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrino JA, Unkel PJ, Miller ID, et al: Large-scale PACS implementation. J Digit Imaging 11:3–7, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yousem, D.M., Beauchamp, N.J. Clinical input into designing a PACS. J Digit Imaging 13, 19–24 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168336

Key Words

Navigation