Skip to main content
Log in

Intra-hospital use of a telepathology system

  • Article
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

Utilization of telepathology systems to cover distant geographical areas has increased recently. However, the potential usefulness of similar systems for closer distances does not seem to be widely appreciated. In this study, we present data on the use of a simple telepathology system connecting the pathology department and the intra-operative consultation room within the operating theaters of the hospital. Ninety-eight frozen section cases from a past period have been re-evaluated using a real-time setup. Forty-eight of the cases have been re-evaluated in the customary fashion; allowing both ends to communicate and cooperate freely. Fifty of the cases, however, were evaluated by the consultant while the operating room end behaved like a “robot”; moving the stage of the microscope, changing and focusing the objectives. The deferral rate was lower than the original frozen section evaluations. Overall, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98%, negative predictive value 96,5% and positive predictive value 100%. No significant difference was found for the diagnostic performances between the cooperative and robotic simulation methods.Our results strengthen the belief that telepathology is a valuable tool in offering pathology services to remote areas. The far side of a hospital building can also be a remote area and a low cost system can be helpful for intraoperative consultations. Educational value of such a system is also commendable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Callas PW, Leslie KO, Mattia AR, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of a rural live video telepathology system. Am J of Surg Pathol 21:812–819, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Celasun B, Aksu A, Safali M, et al: Frozen section as a diagnostic method: Evaluation of 1316 cases. Bull Ankara Pathol Soc 9:41–48, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dunn BE, Almagro UA, Choi H, et al: Dynamic-robotic telepathology: Department of Veterans Affairs feasibility study. Hum Pathol 28:8–12, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eusebi V, Foschini L, Erde S, et al: Transcontinental consults in surgical pathology via the Internet. Hum Pathol 28:13–16, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kayser K, Kayser G: Basic Aspects of and recent developments in telepathology in Europe, with specific emphasis on quality assurance. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 21:319–328, 1999.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuakpaetoon T, Stauch G, Visalsawadi P: Image quality and acceptance of telepathology. Adv Clin Path 2:305–312, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordrum I: Real-time diagnoses in telepathology. Adv Clin Pathol 2:127–189, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oberholzer M, Fischer HR, Christen H, et al: Telepathology with an integrated services digital network-A new tool for image transfer in surgical pathology: A preliminary report. Hum Pathol 24:1078–1085, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raab SS, Robinson RA, Snider TE, et al: Telepathologic review: Utility, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver variability on a difficult case consultation service. Mod Pathol 10:630–635, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinstein RS: Telepathology comes of age in Norway (editorial). Hum Pathol 22:511–513, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein RS, Bhattacharryya AK, Graham AR, et al: Telepathology: a ten year progress report. Hum Pathol 28:1–7, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Öngürü, Ö., Celasun, B. Intra-hospital use of a telepathology system. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 6, 197–201 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032373

Keywords

Navigation