Abstract
Utilization of telepathology systems to cover distant geographical areas has increased recently. However, the potential usefulness of similar systems for closer distances does not seem to be widely appreciated. In this study, we present data on the use of a simple telepathology system connecting the pathology department and the intra-operative consultation room within the operating theaters of the hospital. Ninety-eight frozen section cases from a past period have been re-evaluated using a real-time setup. Forty-eight of the cases have been re-evaluated in the customary fashion; allowing both ends to communicate and cooperate freely. Fifty of the cases, however, were evaluated by the consultant while the operating room end behaved like a “robot”; moving the stage of the microscope, changing and focusing the objectives. The deferral rate was lower than the original frozen section evaluations. Overall, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 98%, negative predictive value 96,5% and positive predictive value 100%. No significant difference was found for the diagnostic performances between the cooperative and robotic simulation methods.Our results strengthen the belief that telepathology is a valuable tool in offering pathology services to remote areas. The far side of a hospital building can also be a remote area and a low cost system can be helpful for intraoperative consultations. Educational value of such a system is also commendable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Callas PW, Leslie KO, Mattia AR, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of a rural live video telepathology system. Am J of Surg Pathol 21:812–819, 1997.
Celasun B, Aksu A, Safali M, et al: Frozen section as a diagnostic method: Evaluation of 1316 cases. Bull Ankara Pathol Soc 9:41–48, 1992.
Dunn BE, Almagro UA, Choi H, et al: Dynamic-robotic telepathology: Department of Veterans Affairs feasibility study. Hum Pathol 28:8–12, 1997.
Eusebi V, Foschini L, Erde S, et al: Transcontinental consults in surgical pathology via the Internet. Hum Pathol 28:13–16, 1997.
Kayser K, Kayser G: Basic Aspects of and recent developments in telepathology in Europe, with specific emphasis on quality assurance. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 21:319–328, 1999.
Kuakpaetoon T, Stauch G, Visalsawadi P: Image quality and acceptance of telepathology. Adv Clin Path 2:305–312, 1998.
Nordrum I: Real-time diagnoses in telepathology. Adv Clin Pathol 2:127–189, 1998.
Oberholzer M, Fischer HR, Christen H, et al: Telepathology with an integrated services digital network-A new tool for image transfer in surgical pathology: A preliminary report. Hum Pathol 24:1078–1085, 1993.
Raab SS, Robinson RA, Snider TE, et al: Telepathologic review: Utility, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver variability on a difficult case consultation service. Mod Pathol 10:630–635, 1997.
Weinstein RS: Telepathology comes of age in Norway (editorial). Hum Pathol 22:511–513, 1991.
Weinstein RS, Bhattacharryya AK, Graham AR, et al: Telepathology: a ten year progress report. Hum Pathol 28:1–7, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Öngürü, Ö., Celasun, B. Intra-hospital use of a telepathology system. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 6, 197–201 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032373
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032373