Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of the effects of magnetic stimulation and electric stimulation on peripheral nerve injury in rat

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The influence of pulsed magnetic stimulation (MS) on the sciatic nerve injury was investigated. Thirty rats were divided into three groups equally: MS group (A), electric stimulation (ES) group (B) and the control group (C). The MS and ES were applied immediately after the first 10 min of the sciatic nerve crush. Sciatic function index (SFI). toe spreading reflex (TSR), muscular weight and volume were measured after the experiment. The TSR of in the groups A and B occurred at 4th day while in the control group it occurs at 10th day. There was statistically significant difference in SFI between groups A and B (P< 0.01). The weight and volume of the gastrocnemius muscle were statistically greater in the groups A and B than in the control group (P< 0.01). The effect of MS was similar to that of ES. It was suggested that the application of MS immediately after the nerve injury might have an important clinical value as it can accelerate functional recovery and prevent or minimize muscle atrophy. The technique is easily to operate, non-invasion, painless and permits tolerance of high intensity output to be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reid J. On the relation between muscular contractility and the nervous system. Lond Edinb Month J Med Sci, 1841, 1:320

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schimrigk K, Mclaughlin J, Gruninger W. The effect of electrical stimulation on the experimentally denervated rat muscle. Scand J Rehab Med, 1977, 9:55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bickford R G, Freeming B D. Neuronal stimulation by pulsed magnetic Fields in animals and man. Dig 6th Int Conf Med Electro Biol Eng, 1965, 112

  4. Barker A T, Jalinous R, Freeston I L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Lancet, 1985, 1:1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raji A R, Bowden R E. Effect of high peak pulsed electromagnetic field on the degeneration and regeneration of the common peroneal nerve in rats. J Bone Join Surgery, 1983, 65:478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jarmo Ruohonen, Marcela Panizza, Jan Nilssonet al. Transverse-Field activation mechanism in magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves. Electroencephalogr clin neurophysiol, 1996, 101:167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang C W, Lien I N. Tardy effect of neurogenic muscular atrophy by magnetic stimulation. Am J Phy Med Rehab, 1994, 73:275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pockett S, Gavin R M. Acceleration of peripheral nerve regeneration after crush injury. Neurosci Letter, 1985, 59:221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown C J, Mackinnon S E, Evans P Jet al. Self-evaluation of walking track measurement using A sciatic function index. Microsurgery, 1989, 10:226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bain J R, Mackinnon S E, Hunter R T. Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal and posterior tibial nerve lesions in rat. Plastic reconstr Surgery, 1989, 83: 129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis J C, McCaffrey T V. Animal model for peripheral nerve grafting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery, 1984, 92:546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Medinaceli L, Freed W J, Wyatt R J. An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks. Exp Neurol, 1982, 77:634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwere G M, Evans P J, Mackinon S Eet al. Walking track analysis; A long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery. Plastic Reconstr Surgery, 1992, 89:251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nix W A, Hopf H C. Electrical stimulation of regenerating nerve and its effect on motor recovery. Brain Res, 1983, 272:21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bannaga, A., Tiecheng, G., Xinbiao, O. et al. A comparative study of the effects of magnetic stimulation and electric stimulation on peripheral nerve injury in rat. Current Medical Science 21, 159–162 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888085

Key words

Navigation