Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of spiral computed tomography in the evaluation of vessel encasement for pancreatic cancer

  • Published:
International journal of pancreatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Conclusions

Spiral CT allows for a noninvasive evaluation of the mesenteric arterial and venous vessels. This test can be performed quicker, with less expense, and with a reduced radiation and contrast load than angiography. Comparison studies of angiography and spiral CT are needed in patients with pancreatic cancer to determine the best method of evaluating possible vessel involvement.

Background

Preoperative imaging of patients with pancreatic cancer is crucial in determining resectability and planning management. Computed tomography (CT) remains the diagnostic procedure of choice for the evaluation of the primary tumor and angiography is the gold standard to evaluate vessel encasement. This case evaluates the usefulness of spiral computed tomography in determining vessel encasement.

Methods

A 53-yr-old female presented with vague abdominal complaints and evaluation revealed a mass in the pancreas. CT suggested portal vein involvement and collateralization was noted in the upper abdomen. Spiral CT revealed normal arterial anatomy and near complete obstruction of the portal vein at the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) splenic vein (SV) confluence.

Results

Operative findings confirmed the involvement of the portal vein at the confluence of the SMV and SV. Pancreatico-duodenectomy with portal vein resection and primary anastomosis was performed. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged home on the 13th postoperative day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sindelar WF. Clinical experience with regional pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.Arch Surg 1989; 124: 127–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi S, Ogata Y, Maeda S. Validity of combined resection of the pancreas and portal vein for carcinoma of the pancreas.Hepato Pancreato Biliary Surg 1992; 5: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dalton R, Hoffman J, Barber B, Eisenberg B. Influence of prior operative assessment and angiographic findings on resectability and survival in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with preoperative chemo-radiation. Abstract presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 17–20, 1994; Houston, TX.

  4. Fuhrman G, Berger D, Lee J, Cusack J, Staley C, Evans D. The rationale for en-bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal venous confluence. Abstract presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 17–20, 1994; Houston, TX.

  5. Tyler DS, Evans DB. Reoperative pancreaticoduodenectomy.Ann Surg 1994; 219: 211–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT, Warshaw AL. Contribution of computed tomography to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.World J Surg 1984; 8: 831–838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosoki T. Dynamic CT of pancreatic tumors.AJR 1983; 140: 959–965.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koehler R, Anderson RE. Computed angiotomography.Radiology 1980; 137: 843–845.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jafri SZH, Aisen AM, Glazer GM, Weiss CA. Comparison of CT and angiography in assessing resectability of pancreatic carcinoma.AJR 1984; 142: 525–529.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuhrman GM, Charnsangavej C, Abbruzzese JL, Cleary KR, Martin RG, Fenoglio CJ. Thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms.Am J Surg 1994; 167: 104–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hessel SJ, Siegelman SS, McNeil J, Sanders R, Adams DF, Alderson PO, Finberg HS, Abrams HL. A prospective evaluation of computed tomography and ultrasound of the pancreas.Radiology 1982; 153: 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ward EM, Stephens DH, Sheedy PR. Computed tomographic characteristics of pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of 100 cases.Radiographics 1983; 3: 547–549.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Megibow AJ, Bosniak MA, Ambor MA. Thickening of the celiac axis and/or superior mesenteric artery: a sign of pancreatic carcinoma on computed tomography.Radiology 1981; 141: 449–456.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan J, Traverso LW. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT.Radiology 1988; 166: 125–133.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Biehl TR, Traverso W, Hauptmann E, Ryan JA. Preoperative visceral angiography alters intraoperative strategy during the Whipple procedure.Am J Surg 1993; 165: 607–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blumke DA, Fishman EK. Spiral CT initial experience with vascular applications.Clin Imaging 1994; 18: 107–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ney DR, Fishman EK, Niederhuber JE. Three-dimensional display of hepatic venous anatomy generated from spiral computed tomography data: preliminary results.J Digit Imaging 1992; 5: 242–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD, Dake MD, McDonnell CH, Song SM, Enzmann DR, Jeffrey RB Jr.: CT angiography with spiral CT and maximumintensity projection.Radiology 1992; 185: 607–610.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB Jr.: Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience.Radiology 1993; 186: 147–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bautz W, Strotzer M, Lenz M, Dittler HJ, Kalender WA. Preoperative evaluation of the vessels of the upper abdomen with spiral CT: comparison with conventional CT and arterial DSA.Radiology 1991; 181: 261.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer: adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection.Arch Surg 1985; 120: 899–903.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lillemoe KD, Sauter PK, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Camerson JL. Current status of surgical palliation of periampullary carcinoma.Surgery 1993; 78: 1053–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jessup JM, Posner M, Huberman M. Influence of multimodality therapy on the management of pancreas carcinoma.Semin Surg Oncol 1993; 9: 27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Geer RJ, Brennan MF. Prognostic indicator for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Am J Surg 1993; 165: 68–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy: 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.Ann Surg 1990; 211: 447–458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Michelassi F, Erroi F, Dawson PJ, Pietrabissa A, Noda S, Block GE. Experience with 647 consecutive tumors of the duodenum, ampulla, head of the pancreas, and distal common bile duct.Ann Surg 1989; 210: 544–556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rooij PD, Rogatko A, Brennan MF. Evaluation of palliative surgical procedures in unresectable pancreatic cancer.Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1053–1058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Monson JRT, Donohue AJ, McEntee GP, McIrath DC, van Heerden JA, Shorter RG, Nagorney DM, Ilstrup DM. Radical resection for carcinoma of the ampulla of vater.Arch Surg 1991; 126: 353–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fortner JG. Regional pancreatectomy for cancer of the pancreas, ampulla, and other related sites.Ann Surg 1984; 199: 418–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure.Ann Surg 1987; 206: 358–365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brooks JR, Brooks DC, Levine JD. Total pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the pancreas.Ann Surg 1989; 209: 405–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tompkins RK, DenBesten L, Longmire WP. Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Am J Surg 1986; 151: 141–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Willet CG, Lewandrowski K, Warshaw AL, Efird J, Compton CC. Resection margins in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: implications for radiation therapy.Ann Surg 1993; 217: 144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yasuda K, Hidekazu M, Fujimoto S, et al. The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography.Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, J.D., Glajchen, N. & Brower, S.T. The use of spiral computed tomography in the evaluation of vessel encasement for pancreatic cancer. Int J Pancreatol 19, 9–14 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788370

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788370

Key Words

Navigation