Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Humor in advertising: A behavioral perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humorous appeals are used extensively in television, radio, and print advertising. This article examines the effectiveness of humor in accomplishing specific communications and sales objectives. A brief review of the literature on humorous advertising research is presented. The author argues that previous unsuccessful applications of light-hearted messages are attributable, in part, to our incomplete knowledge of how consumers process humorously conveyed information. The discussion focuses on the importance of recognizing and managing variables which mediate the impact of humor on audience response and on the need for further development and testing of behavioral theory as keys to the effective utilization of humor in advertising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. and John G. Myers. 1975. Advertising Management. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, Valentine. 1971. “On Advertising Wear Out” Journal of Advertising Research 11 (February), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R., P. Baron and N. Miller. 1973. “The Relation Between Distraction and Persuasion,” Psychological Bulletin 80, 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batman, Thomas. 1965. “The Stan Freeberg Syndrome,” Sponsor (March 1) 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechwith, N. E. 1972. “Multivariate Analysis of Sales Responses of Competing Brands to Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research 2 (May) 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellaire, Arthur. 1977. “Bellaire Survey III Finds Music and Demo Up; Humor, Animation Decline,” Advertising Age (January 3) 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlo, D. C. and H. Kumata. 1956. “The Investigator: The Impact of a Satirical Radio Drama,” Journalism Quarterly, 33, 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bither, Stewart W. 1969. “Comments on Venkatesan and Haaland's Test of the Festinger-Maccoby Divided Attention Hypothesis,” Journal of Marketing Research 6 (May) 237–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byor, T. V. 1974. “Don't Spurn Humor-It Can Get You TV Memorability and Sales Punch, Too,” Advertising Age (June 10) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, Russell H. 1961. Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results. New York: Association for National Advertisers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cone, Fairfax M. 1969. “Advertising Is No Joke; Don't Make It Into One,” Advertising Age (December 15) 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Draper. 1959. “Humor in Advertising,” in E. R. French (ed.), The Copywriter's Guide. New York: Harper and Brothers, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruicker, F. Stewart and Thomas S. Robertson. 1978. “An Appraisal of Low-Involvement Consumer Information, Processing, Attitude Research Conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVoe, Merrill. 1956. Effective Advertising Copy. New York: The MacMillan Company, 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, S. Watson. 1956. Advertising Copy and Communication. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, 303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S. and R. N. Kanungo. 1975. Affect and Memory: A Reformation. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon and Nathan Maccoby. 1964. “On Resistance to Persuasive Communications,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68 (November) 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, David. 1970. “The Distraction Hypothesis in Marketing,” Journal of Advertising Research 10 (December) 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, Charles R. 1965. “An Experimental Study of Satire as Persuasion,” Speech Monographs, 32 (June) 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1966. “A Further Experimental Study as Persuasion,” Speech Monographs 33 (June) 184–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1967. “Editorial Satire as Persuasion: An Experiment,” Journalism Quarterly 44 (Winter) 727–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1967. “Effect of Humor on Speaker Ethos and Audience Information Gain,” Journal of Communication 17 (September), 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1970. “The Effect of Humor on Dull and Interesting Informative Speeches,” Central State Speech Journal 21 (Fall) 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. 1947. Adaptation-Level as a Frame of Reference for Prediction of Psychophysical Data. American Journal of Psychology 60, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1959. “Adaptation-Level Theory,” in Psychology: A Study of a Science, I. Sensory Perception and Physiological Formulations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 565–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., I. L. Janis and H. H. Kelley. 1953. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. Patrick and Paul J. Solomon. 1975. Journal of Advertising 4 (Summer) 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. J. 1972. “An Experimental Study of the Effect of Humorous Message Content Upon Ethos and Persuasiveness,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Kilepla, D. E. 1961. «An Experimental Study of the Effects of Humor on Persuasion,”, unpublished Master's Thesis, Wayne State University.

  • Krugman, Herbert E. 1965. “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly (Fall) 349–356.

  • Lubalin, Peter. 1977. “Humor in Radio,” ANNY (November 4) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longman, Kenneth A. 1979. Personal Communication to C. Duncan, March 15.

  • Lull, P. E., 1940. “The Effectiveness of Humor in Persuasive Speech,” Speech Monographs 7 (December) 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Mervin D. and Richard C. Hartman. 1968. “Dimensions of Humor in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research 8 (December) 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, Dorothy. 1972. “The Effects of Humor on Persuasion,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University.

  • Markiewicz, Dorothy. 1973. “Persuasion as a Function of Humorous Vs. Serious Messages or Contexts,” unpublished manuscript, Northern Illinois University.

  • — 1974. “Effects of Humor on Persuasion,” Sociometry 37 (3) 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, John. 1979. “Getting Ahead on Beer,” Daily Journal American (February 5) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Harry W. 1969. “Contac and Alka Seltzer Prove Humor Can Sell Big,” Advertising Age (September 8) 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monica, Corbett. 1971. “Six Rules to Help You Make Funny TV Commercials,” Advertising Age 42 (October 4) 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • “N. E. Mutual Life Scoffs at Death in New Campaign,” 1968, Advertising Age (May 20).

  • O'Connor, John. 1972. “Humor or Information? WRG Feels Its Recent Ad Efforts Combine Both,” Advertising Age (June 26) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orkin, Richard and B. Berdis. 1977. “The Funny Thing About Some Commercials,” Broadcasting (June 20) 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Kalman. 1968. “When a Funny Commercial Is Good, It's Great!,” Broadcasting 74 (May 13) 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny, G. F. and C. R. Gruner. 1969. “An Experimental Study of the Effect of Satire Used as Support in a Persuasive Sppech,” Western Sppech 33 (Summer) 204–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politz, Alfred. 1960. “The Dilemma of Creative Advertising,” Journal of Marketing (October) 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, David A. 1971. “Ads Aren't That Memorable Anyway,” Marketing Communications (August) 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldes, Gilbert. 1959. “I Laughed Until I Thought I'd Buy,” Tide (January) 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starch, D. 1958. “Do Ad Readers Buy the Product?,” Harvard Business Review 36 (May–June) 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, Major. 1969. “How Sexy Illustrations Affect Brand Recall,” Journal of Advertising Research 9 (March) 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternthal, Brain and C. Samuel Craig. 1973. “Humor in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing 37 (October) 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Daniel K. 1968. “Some Theoretical Considerations of Current Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising Research 8 (December) 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. M. 1964. “The Effectiveness of Humor in Informative Speeches,” Central States Speech Journal 15 (November) 295–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Television Age. 1967. (June 5) 28.

  • Tyebjee Tyzoon T. 1978. “Cognitive Response and the Reception Environment of Advertising,” in S. C. Jain (ed.), Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, American Marketing Association Proceedings.

  • Venkatesan, M. and Gordon A. Haaland. 1968. “Divided Attention and Television Commercials: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Marketing Research 5 (May) 203–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, Jaala. 1967. “Is ‘Far Out’ Advertising Entertaining the Public More But Selling It Less?,” Dun's Review 90 (July) 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winski, Joseph M. 1978. “Tragedy of ‘Drink Schlitz or I'll Kill You’ Ads,” Chicago Tribune (August 9).

  • Winters, L. 1971. Personal Communication to D. Markiewicz. Referenced in: Sternthal and Craig. “Humor in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing 37 (October 1973) 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Peter L. 1973. “The Cognitive Process, Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research 10, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, J. V. 1967. “An Experimental Study of the Persuasive Effects of Satire in a Speech Presented to a High School Audience,” unpublished master's thesis, University of Nebraska.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington State University, Washington, USA

    Calvin P. Duncan D.B.A.

Authors
  1. Calvin P. Duncan D.B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Dr. Phillip D. White for his helpful comments and critical review of an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duncan, C.P. Humor in advertising: A behavioral perspective. JAMS 7, 285–306 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729680

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729680

Keywords

Search

Navigation