Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic imaging in metastatic lung disease

  • Management Of Pulmonary Metastases
  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chest radiographs, full lung tomography and computed tomography of the chest provide increasing sensitivity for evaluation of pulmonary metastases. Pulmonary nodules of 5–10 mm diameter are detectable with increasing frequency by use of high kilovoltage chest radiographs. Full lung linear tomography provides an overall accuracy of 72–97% in diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Chest CT delineates pulmonary nodules as small as 3 mm within 10 mm slice sections. However, as sensitivity increases, specificity diminishes in identifying metastatic nodules. Sensitivity in CT is also reduced by false negative findings due to unequal respiratory cycles. Comparative radiologic-pathologic evaluation of nodule detection proved CT to be the most sensitive screening method for pulmonary metastases. Timing of follow-up studies for pulmonary nodule detection in cancer patients can be determined by tumor growth kinetics; 3–6 month intervals proved to be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bein ME, Stone DN (1981) Full lung linear and pluridirectional tomography: a preliminary evaluation of nodule detection. AJR 136:1013–1015

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brahman SS, Whitcomb ME (1975) Endobronchial metastases. Arch Intern Med 135:543–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brogdon BG, Kelsey CA, Moseley RD Jr (1983) Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clinics N Am 21:633–654

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang AE, Schaner EG, Conkle DM, Flye MW, Doppmann JL, Rosenberg SA (1979) Evaluation of computed tomography in the detection of pulmonary metastases. Cancer 43:913–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen EE, Dietz GW, Murry RC, Moore JG, Stokely EM (1977) Effect of kilovoltage on detectability of pulmonary nodules AJR 128:789–793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cockshott WP, deV Hendrickse JP (1969) Pulmonary calcification at the site of trophoblastic metastases. Br J Radiol 42:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coussement AM, Gooding CA (1973) Cavitating pulmonary metastatic disease in children. AJR 117:833–839

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crow J, Slavin G, Kreel L (1981) Pulmonary metastases: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 47:2595–2602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Curtis AM, Ravin CE, Collier PE, Putman CE, McLoud T, Greenspan RH (1980) Detection of metastatic disease from carcinoma of the breast: limited value of full lung tomography. AJR 134:253–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dinkel E, Uhl H, Roeren T (1985) Lungenmetastasen—Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der radiologischen Diagnostik. Radiologe 25:158–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dodd GD, Boyle JJ (1961) Excavating pulmonary metastases. AJR 85:277–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Doubilet P, Herman PG (1981) Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. AJR 137:1055

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foley WD, Wilson CR, San Dretto M (1986) The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images. Invest Radiol 21:305–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fraser RG, Pare JAP (1979) Diagnosis of diseases of the chest. Philadelphia: Saunders

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuhrmann CR, Gur D, Good B, Rockette H, Cooperstein A, Feist JH (1988) Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters’ perceptions of diagnostic quality. AJR 150:1011–1014

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilbert HA, Kagan AR (1976) Metastases: incidence, detection and evaluation without histologic confirmation. In: Weiss L ed. Fundamental aspects of metastases. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gray JE, Taylor KW, Hobbs BB (1978) Detection accuracy in chest radiography. AJR 131:247–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gürtler KF, Riebel TH, Beron G, Heller M, Euler A (1984) Vergleich von Rötgenübersichtsaufnahmen, Röntgenschichtaufnahmen und Computertomogrammen bei pulmonalen Rundherden im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Roefo 140:416–420

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herman PG, Drummy J, Swensson RG, Hessel SJ, Balikian JP (1982) 350 kV chest radiography has no diagnostic advantage: a comparison with 140 kV technique. AJR 138:485–489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heuck F, Roloff FW (1979) Die kleinfleckigen Formen primärer und sekundärer Lungengeschwülste. Radiologe 19:475–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhns LR, Borlaza G (1980) The “twinkling star” sign. An aid in differentiating pulmonary vessels from pulmonary nodules on computed tomograms. Radiology 135:763–764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D (1978) Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 13:175–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Libshitz HI, Jing B, Wallace S, Logothetis CJ (1983) Sterilized metastases: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. AJR 140:15–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Littleton JT, Durizch ML, Callahan WP (1980) Linear vs. pluridirectional tomography of the chest: correlative radiographic anatomic study. AJR 134:241–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maile CW, Rodan BA, Godwin JD, Chen JTT, Ravin CE (1982) Calcification in pulmonary metastases. Br J Radiol 55:108–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Markewitz M, Taylor DA, Veenema RJ (1967) Spontaneous regression of pulmonary metastasis following palliative nephrectomy. Cancer 20:1147–1154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Muhm JR, Brown LR, Crowe JK, Sheedy PF, Hattery RR, Stephens DH (1978) Comparison of whole lung tomography and computed tomography for detecting pulmonary nodules. AJR 131:981–984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Naidich DP, Zerhouni EA, Siegelman SS (1984) Computed tomography of the thorax. New York: Raven Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neifeld JP, Michaelis LL, Doppman JL (1977) Suspected pulmonary metastases. Correlation of chest x-ray, whole lung tomograms and operative findings. Cancer 39:383–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nordenström B, Sinner WN (1979) Early diagnosis of malignant pulmonary lesions. Importance of tumor size and growth rate. Radiologe 19:162–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peuchot M, Libshitz HI (1987) Pulmonary metastatic disease: radiologic-surgical correlation. Radiology 164:719–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Proto AV, Lane ES (1978) 350 kVp chest radiography. Review and comparison with 120 kVp. AJR 130:859–866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Revesz G, Kundel HL (1977) Psychophysical studies of detection errors in chest radiology. Radiology 123:559–562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schaner EG, Chang AE, Doppman JL, Conkle DM, Flye MW, Rosenberg SA (1978) Comparison of computed and whole lung tomography in detecting pulmonary nodules: a prospective radiologic-pathologic study. AJR 131:51–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sindelar WF, Bagley DH, Felix EL, Doppman JL, Ketcham AS (1978) Lung tomography in cancer patients. Full-lung tomograms in screening for pulmonary metastases. JAMA 240:2060–2063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stender HS, Saure D (1982) Röntgenuntersuchungstechnik der Lunge. Röntgenbl 35:158–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stender HS (1982) Vorgehen und Effizienz bei der Röntgenuntersuchung des Thorax. Radiologe 22:291–299

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University Clinics Freiburg, Hugstetterstr. 55, D 7800, Freiburg, FRG

    E. Dinkel, A. Mundinger, D. Schopp, G. Grosser & K. H. Hauenstein

Authors
  1. E. Dinkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Mundinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Schopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Grosser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. H. Hauenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinkel, E., Mundinger, A., Schopp, D. et al. Diagnostic imaging in metastatic lung disease. Lung 168 (Suppl 1), 1129–1136 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02718253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02718253

Keywords

Search

Navigation