Skip to main content
Log in

Perceiving mitosis in eukaryotic cells

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A sensitive method has been developed for visualizing eukaryotic cells in mitosis (M) phase. It employs Zenker's fixative, which makes the plasma membrane but not the nuclear envelope permeable to immunoglobulins. Zenker's-fixed cells are exposed to an antibody which recognizes a major constituent of chromatin. In this case the antibody is a monoclonal (MC 21) which recognizes histone H2b. Because cells in M phase do not have an intact nuclear envelope, the antibody has access to and interacts with their chromatin. The presence of a nuclear envelope in Zenker's-fixed interphase cells precludes access of the antibody to the nuclear chromatin. Consequently, this indirect immunofluorescence procedure selectively labels M-phase cells. At high enough magnification some details of the chromatin figures are revealed. MC 21 recognizes the chromatin of cells of many different species. With appropriate fixation it can be used effectively on cells in culture. With some procedural modifications it can also be used with more complex tissue systems. Detailed mitotic patterns for chick embryos up to Day 3 of development have been obtained by this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamietz, P.; Klapproth, K.; Hilz, H. Isolation and partial characterization of the ADP-ribosylated nuclear proteins from Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 91:1232–1238; 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindmark, R.; Thoren-Tolling, K.; Sjoquist, J. Binding of immunoglobulins to protein A and immunoglobulin levels in mammalian sera. J. Immunol. Methods 62:1–13; 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barlogie, B.; Drewinko, B.; Raber, M. N., et al. Cell kinetics in clinical oncology. In: Nicolini, C., ed. Cell growth. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Cell Growth. New York: Plenum Press; 1982:773–798.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne, D. H.; Kitos, P. A. Teratogenic effects of cholinergic insecticides in chick embryos. IV The role of tryptophan in protecting against limb deformities. Biochem. Pharmacol. 32:2881–2890; 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chibon, P. Cell proliferation in late embryos and young larvae of the newtPleurodeles waltlii Mickak. In: The cell cycle in development and differentiation. Balls, M.; Billet, F. S., eds., British Society for Developmental Biology Symposium. London: Cambridge University Press; 1973:257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Einck, L.; Bustin, M. Functional histone antibody fragments traverse the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 98:205–213; 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, C. F. The cell cycle during mammalian development. In: Balls, M.; Billet, F. S., eds. The cell cycle in development and differentiation. British Society for Developmental Biology Symposium. London: Cambridge University Press; 1973:293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herbrink, P.; Van Bussel, F. J.; Warnaar, S. O. The antigen spot test (AST): A highly sensitive assay for the detection of antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 48:293–298; 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Humason, G. Animal tissue techniques, 4th ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1979:18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson, G. D.; Nogueira Aranjo, G. M. deC. A simple method of reducing the fading of immunofluorescence during microscopy. J. Immunol. Methods 43:349–350; 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarides, E.; Weber, R. Actin antibody: The specific visualization of actin filaments in non-muscle cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:2268–2272; 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahrens, P. B.; Solursh, M.; Reiter, R. S. Stage-related capacity for limb chondrogenesis in cell culture. Dev. Biol. 28:473–487; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maleyvar, R. P.; Lowery, R. The patterns of mitosis and DNA synthesis in presumptive neurectoderm ofXenopsus laevis (Daudin). In: Balls, M.; Billet, F. S., eds. The cell cycle in development and differentiation. British Society for Developmental Biology Symposium. London: Cambridge University Press; 1973:249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maurer-Schultze, B. Various autoradiographic methods as a tool in cell growth studies. In: Nicolini, C., ed. Cell growth. NATO Advanced Study Institute on Cell Growth. New York: Plenum Press; 1982:83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prentice, D. A.; Loechel, S. C.; Kitos, P. A. Histone H2A phosphorylation in animal cells: Functional considerations. Biochemistry 21:2412–2420; 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stanners, C. P.; Till, J. E. DNA synthesis in individual L-strain mouse cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 37:406–419; 1960.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Towbin, H.; Staehelin, T.; Gordon, J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4350–4354; 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These studies were supported in part by grant ES 03651 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and a grant from the Fogarty International Center between the NIH (USA) and CNRS (France).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, HY., Byrne, D., Hwang, P. et al. Perceiving mitosis in eukaryotic cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 24, 100–107 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02623886

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02623886

Key words

Navigation