Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosing pedal osteomyelitis

Testing choices and their consequences

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacies and cost-effectivenesses of four strategies for the management of suspected pedal osteomyelitis in the setting of vascular impairment: 1) therapeutic trial of short-term antibiotics for presumed cellulitis without osteomyelitis (short); 2) technetium bone scanning followed by either short-term therapy if negative or either a biopsy or aggressive long-term intravenous therapy if positive (scan); 3) bone biopsy followed by long-term intravenous therapy if positive or short-term therapy if negative (biopsy); and 4) immediate long-term intravenous antibiotics for presumed osteomyelitis (long).

Design: Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis with sensitivity analyses. The main outcomes states are amputation and the resource expenditures associated with bone scans, biopsies, and therapies.

Data sources: The authors obtained estimates of test accuracy from literature review and summarized them using newly developed meta-analytic techniques.

Main results: The optimal decision depends heavily on the estimated probability of osteomyelitis at presentation. At very low probabilities, the short-term strategy is preferred. When the probability of osteomyelitis is from 2% to 8%, the lowest amputation rate occurs when one does a diagnostic scan. From 8% to 50%, the best outcomes follow biopsy. At probabilities higher than 50%, the preferred strategy is long-term antibiotics. However, the differences in outcomes are quite small even when osteomyelitis is a virtual certainty.

Conclusions: Over the whole range of prior probabilities, the short-term strategy is the least expensive. At very low probabilities, it dominates the other strategies. When the likelihood of osteomyelitis is higher (10–20%), scanning results in outcomes and cost-effectiveness ratios comparable to those of immediate biopsy and is less invasive. When the probability of osteomyelitis is 50%, biopsy is quite cost-effective compared with all the other strategies (cost-effectiveness ratio = $15,502 per amputation averted) and is preferred to the scan strategy. When the confidence that a patient has osteomyelitis is very high (>90% probability), the improved outcomes associated with long-term antibiotics are achieved with little additional expense and with favorable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with those of the other strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bamberger DM, Daus GP, Gerding DN. Osteomyelitis in the feet of diabetic patients: long-term results, prognostic factors and the role of antimicrobial and surgical therapy. Am J Med. 1987;83:653–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dillon RS. Successful treatment of osteomyelitis and soft tissue infections in ischemic diabetic legs by local antibiotic injections and the end-diastolic pneumatic compression boot. Ann Surg. 1986;204:643–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Apelqvist J, Castenfors J, Larsson J, Stenstrom A, Agardh CD. Wound classification is more important than site of ulceration in the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic Med. 1989;6:526–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Littenberg B, Mushlin AI, and the Diagnostic Technology Assessment Consortium. Bone scans in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis: a meta-analysis of test performance. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:158–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrose GB, Alpert M, Neer CS. Vertebral osteomyelitis: a diagnostic problem. JAMA. 1966;197:101–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caprioli R, Testa J, Cournoyer RW, Esposito FJ. Prompt diagnosis of suspected osteomyelitis by utilizing percutaneous bone culture. J Foot Surg. 1986;25:263–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotty PH, Fouquet B, Pleskof L, et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis: value of percutaneous biopsy. J Neuroradiol. 1988;15:13–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gladstein MO, Grantham SA. Closed skeletal biopsy. Clin Orthop. 1974;103:75–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi KB, Brinker RA. Fine needle diagnosis in lumbar osteomyelitis. Skeletal Radiol. 1983;10:173–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugarman B, Hawes S, Musher DM, Klima M, Young FJ, Pircher F. Osteomyelitis beneath pressure sores. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:683–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thornhill-Joynes M, Gonzales F, Stewart CA, et al. Osteomyelitis associated with pressure ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:214–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:313–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the John A. Hartford Foundation. Dr. Littenberg is an American College of Physicians George Morris Piersol Teaching and Research Scholar.

Reprints are not available.

The Consortium included: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: W. Blair Brooks, MD, Terry Hurlbut HI, MD, Benjamin Littenberg, MD, Andre Midgette, MD, MPH, David Smith, MD, Harold C. Sox, Jr., MD, and Carole Toselli, MD; Massachusetts General Hospital: Albert Mulley, Jr., MD; Stanford University: Lincoln E. Moses, PhD; University of Pennsylvania: Bruce Kinosian, MD, and J. Sanford Schwartz, MD; University of Rochester Medical Center: Daniel Kido, MD, Alvin I. Mushlin, MD, and Charles E. Phelps, PhD; and University of Washington: Richard Hoffman, MD, Dan Kent, MD, and Eric Larson, MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mushlin, A.I., Littenberg, B. & the Diagnostic Technology Assessment Consortium. Diagnosing pedal osteomyelitis. J Gen Intern Med 9, 1–7 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599133

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599133

Key words

Navigation