Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting the outcomes of electrophysiologic studies of patients with unexplained syncope

Preliminary validation of a derived model

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose:To develop and validate a predictive model that would allow clinicians to determine whether an electrophysiologic (EP) study is likely to result in useful diagnostic information for a patient who has unexplained syncope.

Patients:One hundred seventy-nine consecutive patients with unexplained syncope who underwent EP studies at two university medical centers comprised the training sample. A test sample to validate the model was made up of 138 patients from the clinical literature who had undergone EP studies for syncope.

Design:Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing EP studies for syncope. The data collector was blinded to the study hypothesis; the electrophysiologist assessing outcomes was blinded to clinical and historical data. Clinical predictor variables available from the history, the physical examination, electrocardiography (ECG), and Holter monitoring were analyzed via two multivariable predictive modeling strategies (ordinal logistic regression and recursive partitioning) for their abilities to predict the results of EP studies, namely tachyarrhythmic and bradyarrhythmic outcomes. These categories were further divided into full arrhythmia and borderline arrhythmia groups.

Results:Important outcomes were 1) sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 2) bradyarrhythmias, including sinus node and atrioventricular (AV) conducting disease. The results of the logistic regression (in this study, the superior strategy) showed that the presence of organic heart disease [odds ratio (OR)=3.0, p<0.001] and frequent premature ventricular contractions on ECG (OR=6.7, p<0.004) were associated with VT, while the following abnormal ECG findings were associated with bradyarrhythmias: first-degree heart block (OR=7.9, p<0.001), bundle-branch block (OR=3.0, p<0.02), and sinus bradycardia (OR=3.5, p<0.03). Eighty-seven percent of the 31 patients with important outcomes at EP study had at least one of these clinical risk factors, while 95% of the patients with none of these risk factors had normal or nondiagnostic EP studies. In the validation sample, the presence of one or more risk factors would have correctly identified 88% of the test VT patients and 65% of the test bradyarrhythmia patients as needing EP study.

Conclusion:These five identified predictive factors, available from the history, the physical examination, and the initial ECG, could be useful to clinicians in selecting those patients with unexplained syncope who will have a serious arrhythmia identified by EP studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manolis AS, Linzer M, Salem D, Estes NAM. Syncope: current diagnostic evaluation and management. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:850–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brugada P, Green M, Abdollah H, Wellens HJJ. Significance of ventricular arrhythmias initiated by programmed stimulation. Circulation. 1984;69:87–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Prystowsky EN. Electrophysicologic — electropharmacologic testing in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. PACE. 1988;11:225–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DiMarco JP, Garan H, Harthorne JW, Ruskin JN. Intracardiac electrophysiologic techniques in recurrent syncope. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:542–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hess DS, Morady F, Scheinman MM. Electrophysiologic testing in the evaluation of patients with syncope of undetermined origin. Am J Cardiol. 1982;50:1309–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gulamhusein S, Naccarelli GV, Ko PT, et al. Value and limitations of clinical electrophysiologic study in assessment of patients with unexplained syncope. Am J Med. 1982;73:700–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akhtar M, Shenasa M, Denker S, Gilbert CJ, Rizwi N. Role of cardiac electrophysiologic studies in patients with unexplained syncope. PACE. 1983;6:192–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Teichman SL, Felder SD, Matos JA, Kim S, Waspe LE, Fisher JD. The value of electrophysiologic studies in syncope of undetermined origin. Am Heart J. 1985;110:469–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boudoulas H, Schaal SF, Lewis RP. Electrophysiologic risk factors of syncope. J Electrocardiol. 1978;11:339–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Westveer DC, Stewart J, Vandam D, Gordon S, Timmis GC. The role of electrophysiologic studies in the evaluation of recurrent, unexplained syncope. Cardiovasc Rev Rep. 1984;5:770–80.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ezri M, Lerman BB, Marchlinski EE, Buxton E, Josephson ME. Electrophysiologic evaluation of syncope in patients with bifascicular block. Am Heart J. 1983;106:693–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olshansky B, Mazuz M, Martins J. Significance of inducible tachycardia in patients with syncope of unknown origin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:216–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Doherty DU, Pembrook-Rogers D, Grogran EW, et al. Electrophysiologic evaluation and follow-up characteristics of patients with recurrent unexplained syncope and presyncope. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:703–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia CR, Sanjuan R, Morrell S, et al. Electrophysiologic studies in patients with syncope of unknown origin. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1985;38:190–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Denes P, Ezri MD. The role of electrophysiologic studies in the management of patients with unexplained syncope. PACE. 1985;8:424–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaul U, Kalra GS, Talwar KK, Bhatia ML. The value of intracardiac electrophysiologic techniques in recurrent syncope of “unknown cause.” Int J Cardiol. 1986;10:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Twidale N, Tonkin AM. Clinical electrophysiology study in patients with syncope of undetermined etiology. Aust N Z J Med. 1987;17:512–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bardy G, Packer DL, German LD, Gallagher J. Utility of electrophysiologic studies in the management of tachycardia, sudden death and syncope. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;427:16–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morady F, Scheinman MM. The role and limitations of electrophysiologic testing in patients with syncope. Int J Cardiol. 1983;4:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, Goldman L. Evaluation of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med. 1982;73:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eagle KA, Black HR, Cook EF, Goldman L. Evaluation of prognostic classifications for patients with syncope. Am J Med. 1985;79:455–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin GJ, Adams SL, Martin HG, Mathews J, Zull D, Scanlon PJ. Prospective evaluation of syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:499–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kapoor WN, Karpf M, Weiand S, Peterson JR, Levey GS. A prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with syncope. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gendelman HE, Linzer M, Gabelman M, Smoller S, Scheuer J. Syncope in a general hospital patient population. N Y State J Med. 1983;83:1161–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Denes P, Uretz E, Ezri MD, Borbola J. Clinical predictors of electrophysiologic findings in patients with syncope of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1922–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krol RB, Morady F, Flaker GC, et al. Electrophysiologic testing in patients with unexplained syncope: clinical and noninvasive predictors of outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:358–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheinman MM, Peters RW, Modin G, Brennan M, Mies C, O’Young J. Prognostic value of infranodal conduction time in patients with chronic bundle branch block. Circulation. 1977;56:240–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Narula OS, Samet P, Javier RP. Significance of the sinus-node recovery time. Circulation. 1972;45:140–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dhingra RC, Wyndham C, Bauernfeind R, et al. Significance of block distal to the His bundle induced by atrial pacing in patients with chronic bifascicular block. Circulation. 1979;60:1455–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Harrell FE. The logist procedure In: SUGI supplemental library users guide, version 5. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 1986;269–93.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Matchar DB, Reichert TA. Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985;69:1071–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fujimura O, Yee R, Klein GJ, Sharma AD, Boahene KA. The diagnostic sensitivity of electrophysiologic testing in patients with syncope caused by transient bradycardia. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1703–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bass EB, Elson JJ, Fogoros RN, Peterson J, Arena VC, Kapoor WN. Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for syncope of unknown origin. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:1186–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krishnaswami V, Geraci AR. Permanent pacing in disorders of sinus node function. Am Heart J 1975;89:579–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Linzer M, Prystowsky EN, Brunetti LL, Varia I, German LA. Recurrent syncope of unknown origin diagnosed by ambulatory continuous loop ECG recording. Am Heart J. 1988;116:1632–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cumbee SR, Pryor RE, Linzer M. Cardiac loop ECG recorders in unexplained syncope. South Med J. 1990;83:39–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Linzer M, Pritchett ELC, Pontinen M, McCarthy E, Divine GW. Incremental diagnostic yield of cardiac loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:214–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules: applications and methodologic standards. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:793–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Department of Medicine, the Division of Biometry, Department of Community and Family Medicine, and the Center for Health Policy Research and Education, Duke University Medical Center, and the Health Services Research Field Program, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Supported by an Andrew Mellon Foundation Clinical Epidemiology Grant and a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linzer, M., Prystowsky, E.N., Divine, G.W. et al. Predicting the outcomes of electrophysiologic studies of patients with unexplained syncope. J Gen Intern Med 6, 113–120 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598305

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598305

Key words

Navigation