Skip to main content
Log in

Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) complex learning skills reassessed

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results from three experiments on basic learning and transfer in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) are reported in which fully automated testing paradigms, afforded by the Language Research Center's Computerized Test System (LRC-CTS), were employed. Performance levels for discrimination learning set, transfer index, and mediational-learning testing were uniformly higher than was predicted from the literature, in contrast to previous reports of compromised learning under similar conditions (automated apparatus, planimetric stimuli, spatial discontiguity between stimuli and response loci). Analyses reveal relatively advanced learning set performance, transfer-index ratios, and positive transfer of learning even at stringent criterion levels. Moreover, the data suggest that rhesus monkeys tested in these experiments exhibit mediational instead of associative learning strategies, as do great apes and in contrast to previous reports of rhesus learning. We argue that the LRC-CTS enhances learning by nonhuman primate subjects, obviating those factors, reported in the literature from experiments in which manual or other automated systems were employed, that compromise learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davenport, J. W., Chamove, A. S., and Harlow, H. F. (1970). The semiautomatic Wisconsin general test apparatus.Behav. Res. Methods Instrument. 2: 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essock-Vitale, S. M. (1978). Comparison of ape and monkey modes of problem solution.J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 92: 942–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fobes, J. L., and King, J. E. (1982). Measuring primate learning abilities. In Fobes, J. L., and King, J. E. (eds.),Primate Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 289–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets.Psychol. Rev. 56: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerison, H. J. (1973).Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meador, D., Rumbaugh, D. M., Pate, J. L., and Bard, K. (1988). Learning, problem solving, cognition, and intelligence. In Mitchell, G., and Erwin, J. (eds.),Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2, Part B, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 17–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. R., Treichler, F. R., and Meyer, P. M. (1965). Discrete trial training techniques and stimulus variables. In Schrier, H., Harlow, H. F., and Stollnitz, F. (eds.),Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polidora, V. J., and Main, W. T. (1963). Punched card programming and recording techniques employed in the automation of the WGTA.J. Exper. Anal. Behav. 6: 599–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. H., Gardner, K. W., Pressman, G. L., and Bagshaw, M. (1963). Automated analysis of multiple choice behavior.J. Exper. Anal. Behav. 6: 123–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, W. K., Washburn, D. A., Hopkins, W. D., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., and Rumbaugh, D. M. (1990). The NASA/LRC computerized test system.Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 22: 127–131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M. (1969). The transfer index: An alternative measure of learning set. In Carpenter, C. R. (ed.),Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Primatology, Vol. 1, Behavior, Karger, Basel, pp. 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M., and Pate, J. L. (1984). The evolution of cognition in primates: A comparative perspective. In Roitblat, H. L., Bever, T. G., and Terrace, H. S.,Animal Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 569–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M., Bell, C. L., and Gill, T. V. (1972). Two discrimination test apparatuses for primates.Behav. Res. Methods Instrument. 4: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M., Richardson, W. K., Washburn, D. A., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., and Hopkins, W. D. (1989). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity.J. Comp. Psychol. 103: 32–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidowski, J. B., and Spears, C. A. (1970). A versatile apparatus for measuring the frequencies and durations of animal and human responses.Behav. Res. Methods Instrument. 2: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stollnitz, F. (1965). Spatial variables, observing responses, and discrimination learning sets.Psychol. Rev. 72: 247–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. A., Hopkins, W. D., and Rumbaugh, D. M. (1989a). Automation of learning-set testing: The video-task paradigm.Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 21: 281–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, D. A., Hopkins, W. D., and Rumbaugh, D. M. (1989b). Video-task assessment of learning and memory in macaques (Macaca mulatta): Effects of stimulus movement upon performance.J. Exper. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 15: 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Washburn, D.A., Rumbaugh, D.M. Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) complex learning skills reassessed. International Journal of Primatology 12, 377–388 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547618

Key Words

Navigation