Skip to main content
Log in

Light and the developing retina

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) has increased in the United States in the past decade. Its resurgence has been attributed to advances in medical care which have increased the survival of infants less than 1000g. Retinal immaturity and exposure to supplementary oxygen are generally accepted as the principal factors associated with ROP, however precocious exposure of the immature retina to light may also contribute. The preterm infant is routinely exposed for the duration of hospital stay to bright continuous light at levels which produce retinal damage in animals. A recent study has provided evidence implicating light in ROP. Preterm infants for whom the light levels were reduced had a lower incidence of ROP, compared to a similar group of preterms exposed to standard levels of nursery light. Given the problems of a non-randomized design, the results must be considered preliminary; however the findings are substantiated by parallel results in both hospitals studied and by an effect of exposure to light within the treatment group. Speculations regarding the mechanisms of light as a contributor to ROP include: alterations of retinal metabolism, cellular damage by phototoxicity, and the generation of free radicals. Mechanisms of phototoxicity are compatible with theories of oxygen toxicity. Light may not be necessary for ROP to occur, but it may increase the risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fielder AR, Moseley MJ, NG YK. The immature visual system and premature birth. British Medical Bulletin 1988; 44: 1093–1118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaiter J, Avery GB, Temple C, Johnson A, White N. Stimulation characteristics of nursery environments for critically ill preterm infants and infant behavior. In Stern D (ed): ‘Intensive Care in the Newborn, 3rd Ed.’ New York, Masson Publishing Co., 1981; pp 389–410.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glass P, Avery GB, Subramanian KN, Keys MP, Sostek AM, Friendly DS. Effect of bright light in the hospital nursery on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 401–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gottfried AW, Wallace-Lande P, Sherman-Brown S, King J, Coen C. Physical and social environment of newborn infants in special care units. Science 1981; 214: 673–675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawson K. Environmental characteristics of a neonatal intensive-care unit. Child Dev 1977; 48: 1633–1639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Landry RJ, Scheidt PC, Hammond RW. Ambient light and phototherapy conditions of eight neonatal care units: a summary report. Pediatrics 1985; 75: 434–436.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramov I, Hainline L, Lemerise E, Brown AK. Changes in visual functions of children exposed as infants to prolonged illumination. J Am Optometry Assoc 1985; 56: 614–619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobson V, Riggs LA, Siqueland ER. Electroretinographic determination of dark adaptation functions of children exposed to phototherapy as infants. J Pediatr 1974; 85: 25–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dobson V, Cowett RM, Riggs LA. Long-term effect of phototherapy on visual function. J Pediatr 1975; 86: 555–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V, Morante A, Verghote M. Visual function in the preterm and fullterm newborn infant. Dev Med Child Neurol 1980; 22: 465–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sisson TR, Glauser SC, Glauser EM. Retinal changes produced by phototherapy. J Pediatr 1970; 77: 221–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams T, Baker B (eds). Symposium on Effects of Constant Light on Visual Processes. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lanum J. The damaging effects of light on the retina: Empirical findings, theoretical and practical implications. Surv Ophthalmol 1978; 22: 221–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuwabara T, Gorn RA. Retinal damage by visible light. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 79: 69–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Stern WK. Retinal and optic nerve serotonin and retinal degeneration as influenced by photoperiod. Exp Neurol 1970; 27: 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Messner K, Maisels M, Leure-duPree A. Phototoxicity in the newborn primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 178–182.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawwill T. Three major pathologic processes caused by light in the primate retina: A search for mechanisms. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982; 80: 517–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Noell WK. Possible mechanism of photoreceptor damage by light in mammalian eyes. Vis Res 1980; 20: 1163–1171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Terry TL. Retrolental fibroplasia. J Pediatr 1946; 29: 770–773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hepner WR, Krause AC, Davis ME. Retrolental fibroplasia and light. Pediatrics 1949; 3: 824–828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Locke JC, Reese AB. Retrolental fibroplasia. Arch Ophthalmol 1952; 48: 44–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Riley PA, Slater TF. Pathogenesis of retrolental fibroplasia. Lancet 1969; 2: 265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Glass P. Role of light toxicity in the developing retinal vasculature. Birth Defects. Vol. 24, No. 1, 103–117.

  24. Stefansson E, Wolbarsht ML, Landers MB. In vivo O2 consumption in rhesus monkeys in light and dark. Exp Eye Res 1983; 37: 251–256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zuckerman R, Weiter JJ. Oxygen transport in the bullfrog retina. Exp Eye Res 1980; 30: 117–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Flower RW, McLeod DS, Lutty GA. Postnatal retinal vascular development of the puppy. Invest Ophthal and Visual Sci 1984; 26: 957–968.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fridovich I. The biology of oxygen radicals. Science 1978; 201: 875–880.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ham WT, Mueller HA, Ruffolo JJ. Mechanisms underlying the production of photochemical lesions in the mammalian retina. Curr Eye Res 1984; 3: 165–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruffolo JJ, Ham WT, Mueller HA, Millen JE. Photochemical lesions in the primate retina under conditions of elevated blood oxygen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 893–898.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Noell W, Albrecht R. Irreversible effects on visible light on the retina: Role of vitamin A. Science 1971; 172: 76–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Avery GB, Glass P. Light and retinopathy of prematurity: What's prudent for 1986? Pediatrics 1986; 78: 519–520.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glass, P. Light and the developing retina. Doc Ophthalmol 74, 195–203 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482609

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482609

Key words

Navigation