Skip to main content
Log in

Regional habitat appraisals of wildlife communities: a landscape-level evaluation of a resource planning model using avian distribution data

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple regional habitat model founded on the relation between vertical habitat complexity and species richness has been used to describe wildlife habitat in response to macroscale patterns in land use and land cover. While the model has a basis in ecological theory, it has not been subjected to rigorous testing. We evaluated the model's fundamental assumption on landscapes in the eastern forested region of the United States and found the model to be supported when we used a measure of avian community integrity during the breeding season. The model was improved by incorporating measures of horizontal heterogeneity, indicating that the vertical and horizontal structure of habitats should be considered in analyzing the response of wildlife to land resource policies that can affect broad land use patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American birds, 6th edition. American Ornithologists' Union. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askins, R.A. and Philbrick, M.J. 1987. Effect of changes in regional forest abundance on the decline and recovery of a forest bird community. Wilson Bull. 99: 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchley, W.R., Gaskins, C.I. and Anderson, D. 1976. Statistical properties of ratios. L Empirical results. Sysl. Zool. 25: 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, P.V. 1983. The role of habitat complevity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical mammal communities. Ecology 64: 1495–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. and Roughgarden, J. 1990. Ecology for a changing earth. Ecol. Soc. Bull. 71: 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bystrak, D. 1981. The North American breeding bird survey.In Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. pp. 522–532. Edited by C.J. Ralph and J.M. Scott. Studies in Avian Biology No. 6.

  • Connell, J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeGraat, R.M. 1986. Urban bird habitat relationships: application to landscape design. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Cont. 51: 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. and Sessions, G. 1984. The development of natural resources and the integrity of nature. Environ. Ethies 6: 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droege, S. 1990. The North American breeding bird survey. U.S. Department of the Interior. Eish and Wildlife Service. Biol. Rep. 90(1) Washington D.C.

  • Efron, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM. monograph #38. CBMS-NES. Regional conference series in applied mathematics.

  • Emlen, J.M. and Pikitch, E.K. 1989. Animal population dynamics: identification of critical components. Ecol. Model. 44: 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eager, E.W. 1972. Diversity: a sampling study. Am. Nat. 106: 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hather, C.H. and Hoekstra, I.W. 1989. An analysis of the wildlife and fish situation in the United States: 1989–2040. Gen. Lech. Rep. RM-178. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expenment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather, C.H. 1988. Wildlife abundance and occurrence models: application in regional resource planning.In Perspectives on land modelling. pp. 37–48. Edited by R. Gelinas, D. Bond. and B. Smit. Polyscience Publications, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. L. L. and Godron, M. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31: 733–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. L. L. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, E.R. 1988. The hump-backed species diversity curve: why has it not been found among land animals. Oikos 53: 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerell, R. 1988. Faunal diversity and vegetation structure of some deciduous forests in South Sweden. Holare. Ecol. 11: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle, P. 1986. Bird community dynamics in a boreal forest reserve: the importance of large-scale regional trends. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 23: 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A., Krohn, W.B., Schweitzer, D.L., and Thomas, C.H. 1979. Irends and needs in federal inventories of wildlife habitat. Irans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 44: 340–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M.L. 1987. Managing forests for spatial heterogeneity to maintain biological diversity. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 52: 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkley, D.B. 1985. Relationships between avian species richness and environmental characteristics in North America. Thesis. Ph.D. University of Wyoming, Laramie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istock, C.A. and Scheiner, S.M. 1987. Affinities and higher-order diversity within landscape mosaics. Evol. Ecol. 1: 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D.A., Harvey, H.H. and Somers, K.M. 1990. Ratios in aquatic sciences: statistical shortcomings with mean depth and the morphoedaphic indev. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 1788–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, E.C. and Rathbun, S. 1981. Rarefaction, relative abundance, and diversity of avian communities. Auk 98: 785–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R. 1990. Biological integrity and the goal of environmental legislation: lessons for conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 4: 244–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R. and Dudley, D.R. 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environ. Manage. 5: 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R. and Roth, R.R. 1971. Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several new world areas. Am. Nat. 105: 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, B.C. 1982. Beware of spurious self-correlations. Water Resour. Res. 18: 1041–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L. L. and Muller, K.E. 1988. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek, J.M. and Kitchings, J.I. 1985. A regional technique to address land-use changes and animal habitats. Environ. Conserv. 12: 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek, J.M., Krummel, J.R., Mankin, J.B. and O'Neill, R.V. 1983. A theoretical approach to regional environmental conflicts. J. Environ. Manage. 16: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek, J.M., Olson, R.J., Emerson, C.J. and Joness, J.I. 1979. Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. Environ. Conserv. 6: 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D.H. 1987. Parasites, lightning, and the vegetation mosate in wilderness landscapes.In Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. pp. 59–83. Edited by M.G. Lurner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, N.B. and Wiens, J.A. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a bierarchical framework for the study of heterogencity. Oikos 59: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape pattern in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchler, A.W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation on the conterminous United States. Am. Geogr. Soc. Spec. Publ. 36.

  • Lennartz, M.R. and McClure, J.P. 1979. Estimating the extent of red-cockaded woodpecker habitat in the southeast.In Forest resource inventories, vol. 1, pp. 48–62. Edited by W.E. Erayer. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. and MacArthur, J.W. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H., MacArthur, J.W. and Preer, J. 1962. On bird species diversity II. Prediction of bird censits from habitat measurements. Am. Nat. 96: 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNally, R.C. 1990a. An analysis of density responses of forest and woodland birds to composite physiognomic variables. Aust. J. Ecol. 15: 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNally, R.C. 1990b. The roles of floristies and physiognomy in avian community composition. Aust. J. Ecol. 15: 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, B.A. 1985. Avian community dynamics in desert grasslands: observational scale and hierarchial structure. Ecol. Monogr. 55: 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns.In Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. pp. 199–235. Edited by M.G. Lurner and R.H. Gardner. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noon, B.R., Dawson, D.K. and Kelly, J.P. 1985. A search for stability gradients in North American breeding bird communities. Auk 102: 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. and Harris, L. 1986. Nodes, networks, and MUM's: preserving diversity at all scales. Environ. Manage. 10: 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.L., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.L. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landse. Ecol. 1: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J.G. 1990. An analysis of the spatial structure of mammalian distribution patterns in Tevas. Ecology 71: 1823–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.I.A. 1976. Succession: an evolutionary interpretation. Am. Nat. 110: 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recher, H.E. 1969. Bird species diversity and habitat diversity in Australia and North America. Am. Nat. 103: 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.E. 1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235: 167–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberry, J.T. 1985. The role of habitat in avian community composition: physiognomy or floristies? Oecologia 67: 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, R.R. 1976. Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity. Ecology 57: 773–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, D.J. and Lee, R.G. 1990. Natural resource policy analysis and rational choice theory: a strategy for empirical research. Nat. Resour. J. 30: 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102: 243–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, G.C. Ables, E.D., Sparrowe, R.D., Grieb, J.R., Harris, L.D. and Moen, A.N. 1979. Research needs in wildlife. Itans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 44: 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R.L. 1987. Community models for wildlife impact assessment: a review of concepts and approaches. Biological Report 87(2). U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Sheffield, R.M. 1981. Multiresource inventories: techniques for evaluating nongame bird habitat. Res. Pap. SE-218. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina.

  • Short, H.L. 1982. Development and use of a habitat gradrent model to evaluate wildlife habitat. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 47: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, H.L. 1988. A habitat structure model for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manage. 27: 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, H.L. and Burnham, K.P. 1982. Technique for structuring wildlife guilds to evaluate impacts on wildlife communities. USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service. Spec. Sci. Rep. Wildl. No. 244. Washington, D.C.

  • Streeter, R.G., Chalk, D.F., Thomas, C.H. and Krohn, W.B. 1983. National appraisal for wildlife habitat from inventory to management.In Renewable resource inventories for monitoring changes and trends. pp. 674–677. Edited by J.E. Bell and I. Atterbury. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F.J., Kratz, T.K., Caine, N. and Woodmansee, R.G. 1988. Landform effects on ecosystem pattern and process. BioScience 38: 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E.J. and Sparks, R.E. 1990. Long-term ecological research and the invisible place. BioScience 40: 502–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szaro, R.C. 1987. Guild management: an evaluation of avian guilds as a predictive tool. Environ. Manage. 10: 681–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurnet, M.G., (ed.) 1987. Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L., O'Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H. 1987. Landscape ecology: a hierarchial perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37: 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture 1989a. A national program for soil and water conservation. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1989b. The second RCA appraisal. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1981. I and resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States. Agriculture Handbook 296. Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1987. Basic statistics. 1982 national resources inventory. Statistical Bulletin 756. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey. 1987. I and use and land cover digital data from 1:250,000- and 1:100,000-scale maps. Data users guide 4. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. 1984. The guild concept applied to management of bird populations. Environ. Manage. 8: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P.A. 1990. Modelling wildlife distributions using a geographic information system: kangaroos in relation to climate. J. Biogeogr. 17: 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1989. The ecology of bird communities. Volume I. Foundations and patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1991. Ecological similarity of shrub-desert avifauna of Australia and North America. Ecology 72: 479–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., Rotenberry, J.L. and Van Horne, B. 1987. Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrub-steppe birds: the effects of spatial scale. Oikos 48: 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.V. and Shmida, A. 1984. Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data. J. Ecol. 72: 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In cooperation with Colorado State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flather, C.H., Brady, S.J. & Inkley, D.B. Regional habitat appraisals of wildlife communities: a landscape-level evaluation of a resource planning model using avian distribution data. Landscape Ecol 7, 137–147 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418944

Keywords

Navigation