Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary studies on the effects of direct current on the bone/porous implant interfaces

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of small direct current (∼8μA) upon the tensile strength of the interfacial union between porous metal and polymer implants (100–200 μm diam pores) and bone was studied in the femur of dogs.

The present results show that the electrical stimulation accelerates the rate of bony tissue growth into pores of the implants regardless of the nature of the materials tested. It is particularly exciting to find that the porous metal can be used as an electrode as well as an implant. This implies that an ordinary prosthesis made of metal can be made porous and the fixation time period can be shortened by the electrical stimulation. This has an enormous potential for all the direct fixation prostheses for rapid achievement of fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black, J. and C.T. Brighton. Mechanisms of stimulation of osteogenesis by D.C. current. Presented at the Conference on Electric and Magnetic Control of Musculoskeletal Growth and Repair. Univ. of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 18–20, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brighton, C.T., Z.B. Friedenberg, L.M. Zemsky, and P.R. Pollis. Direct-current stimulation of non-union and congenital pseudoarthrosis.J. Bone J. Surg. 57A:368–377, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Currey, J.D., A.H. Burstein, and D.T. Reilly. The effect of stress concentrations in bone. 5th Annual Biomaterials Symposium, Session 4. Clemson University: Clemson, SC, April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedenberg, Z.B., B.I. Smolenski, B.W. Pearl, and C.T. Brighton. Bone reaction to varying amounts of direct currents.Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 131:894–899, 1970.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Galante, J. and W. Rostoker. Fiber metal composites in the fixation of skeletal prosthesis.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. 7(4):43–61, 1973.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassler, C.R., E.F. Rybicki, R.B. Diegle, and L.C. Clark. Studies of enhanced bone healing via electrical stimuli: Comparative effectiveness of various parameters.Clin. Orthop. 124:9–19, 1977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hench, L.L., and E.C. Ethridge. Biomaterials—the interfacial problem. In:Advances in Biomedical Engineering, edited by J.H.U. Brown and J.F. Dickson III. New York: Academic Press, vol. 5.

  8. Hulbert, S.F., F.W. Cooke, J.J. Klawitter, R.B. Leonard, B.W. Sauer, and D.D. Moyle. Attachment of prosthesis to the musculoskeletal system by tissue ingrowth and mechanical locking.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. 7 (4):1–23, 1973.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jowsey, J., T.J. Kelley, L. Riggs, A.M. Bianco, D.A. Scholz, and J.G. Cohen. Quantitative microradiographic studies of normal and osteoporotic bone.J. Bone J. Surg. 47A:785–806, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klawitter, J.J., A.M. Weinstein, S.F. Hulbert, and B.W. Sauer. Tissue ingrowth and mechanical locking for anchorage of prostheses in locomotor system. In:Advances in Artificial Hip and Knee Joint Technology, edited by M. Schaldach, and H. Hohmann. New York and Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park, J.B.Biomaterials: An Introduction. New York: Plenus Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Park, J.B. and G.H. Kenner. Effect of electrical stimulation on the tensile strength of the porous implant and bone interface.Biomater. Med. Devices Artif. Organs. 3(2):233–243, 1975.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park, J.B. and G.H. Kenner. Effect of electrical stimulation on the tensile strength and bone formation.Biomater. Med. Devices Artif. Organs. 4(2):225–233, 1976.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Predecki, P., B.A. Auslaender, J.E. Stephan, V.L. Mooney, and C. Stanitski. Attachment of bone to threaded implants by ingrowth and mechanical interlocking.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 6:401–412, 1972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Salman, N.N., J.B. Park, G.H. Kenner, and A.F. von Recum. Electrical stimulation on bone growth into porous metal. 31st Meeting of the Alliance for Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Atlanta, GA, October 21–25, 1978.

  16. Sauer, B.W., J.J. Klawitter, H.M. Weinstein, and M. Spector. The use of polymers in high load bearing joints in the locomotive system. In:Advances in Artificial Hip and Knee Joint Technology, New York and Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spadaro, J.A. Electrically stimulated bone growth in animals and man—a review of the literature.Clin. Orthop. 122:325–332, 1977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstein, A.M., J.J. Klawitter, T.W. Cleveland, and D.C. Amoss. Electrical stimulation of bone growth into porous Al2O3.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10:231–247, 1976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Young, S.O., J.B. Park, G.H. Kenner, R.R. Moore, B.R. Myers, and B.W. Sauer. Dental implant fixation by electrically mediated process. I. Interfacial strength.Biomater. Med. Devices Artif. Organs. 6(2):111–126, 1978.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J.B., Salman, N.N., Kenner, G.H. et al. Preliminary studies on the effects of direct current on the bone/porous implant interfaces. Ann Biomed Eng 8, 93–101 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02363173

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02363173

Keywords

Navigation