Skip to main content
Log in

Temperament as a correlate of adolescent defences mechanisms

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey, which assesses nine dimensions of temperament, and the Denfense Style Questionnaire, used to assess defense mechanisms, were completed by 107 female adolescents. Temperament was found to be strongly correlated with defense style, particulary with immature defenses (p=0.0001). The findings support the hypothesis that the biological dimension of temperament is correlated with specific defense mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaillant G: Natural history of male psychological health: V. The relation of choice of ego mechanisms of defense to adult adjustment.Arch Gen Psychiat 3:535–545, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vaillant GE, Bond M, Vaillant CO: An empirically validated hierarchy of defense mechanisms.Arch Gen Psychiat 43:786–794, 1986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaillant GE, Drake RE: Maturity of ego defenses in relations to DSM-III axis II personality disorder.Arch Gen Psychiat 42:597–601, 1985.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M: The Defense Style Questionnaire.J Nerv Ment Dis 181:246–256, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erikson EH:Childhood and Society, Second Edition. New York: Norton, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kernberg OF:Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bond M, Perry JC, Gautier M, Goldenberg M, Oppenheimer J, Simand J: Validating the self-report of defense styles.J Personality Disorders 3:101–112, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt C: Vulnerability factors and long-term outcome after cognitive-behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders. Paper presented at the Fourth World Congress on Behavior Therapy, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 1992.

  9. Fraiberg S: Pathological defenses in infancy.Psychoanal Q 612–635, 1982.

  10. Andrews G: Anxiety, personality, and anxiety disorders.Int Rev Psychiat 3:293–302, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haan N: Tripartite model of ego functioning values and clinical research applications.J Nerv Ment Dis 148:14–30, 1969.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstock A: Family environment and the development of defense and coping mechanisms.J Pers Soc Psychol 5:67–75, 1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haan N: Personality development from adolescence to adulthood in Oakland growth and guidance studies.Semin Psychiat 4:399–414, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas A, Chess S, Birch HG, Hertzig ME, Korn S:Behavioral Individuality in Early Childhood. New York: New York University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas A, Chess S:Temperatment and Development, New York: Bruner/Mazel, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas A, Chess S: Genesis and evolution of behavioral disorders: from infancy to early adult life.Am J Psychiat 141:1–9, 1984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chess S: Studies in temperatment: a paradigm in psychosocial research.Yale J Biol Med 63:313–324, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Windle M, Lerner RM: Reassessing the dimensions of temperatmental individuality across the life span: the Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R).J Adolescent Research 1:2:213–230, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Windle M: Revised dimensions of temperament survey (DOTS-R): simultaneous group confirmatory factor analysis for adolescent gender groups.Psychological Assessment 4:228–234, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bond M, Gardiner ST, Christian J, Sigel JJ: Empirical study of self-rated defense styles.Arch Gen Psychiat 40:333–338, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bond M: Defense Style Questionnaire. In:Empirical studies of ego mechanisms of defense, ed. Vaillant GE, pp. 146–152. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrews G, Pollock C, Stewart G: The determination of defense style by questionaire.Arch Gen Psychiat 46:455–460, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaillant GE: Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechnaisms: a 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health.Arch Gen Psychiat 24:107–118. 1971.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman SS, Araujo K, Steiner H: Defense mechanisms in adolescents as a function of age, sex and mental health status.J Am Acad Child Psychiat in press, 1996.

  25. Cloninger R, Svrakic DM, Prysbeck TR: Psychological model of temperament and character.Arch Gen Psychiat 50:975–990, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Luby JL, Steiner H: Concordance of parent-child temperament ratings in a clinical sample of adolescent girls.Child Psychiat Hum Develpm 23:4:297–305, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Perry JC, Cooper SH: A preliminary report on defenses and conflicts associated with borderline personality disorder.J Am Psychoanal Assoc 34:863–893, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Akkerman K, Carr V, Lewin T: Changes in ego defenses with recovery from depression.J Nerv Ment Dis 180:634–638, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Margo GM, Greenberg RP, Fisher S, Dewan M: Drirect comparison of the defense mechanisms of nondepressed people and depressed psychiatric inpatients.Compr Psychiat 34:65–69, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Freud S:Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. London: Hogarth Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Freud A.The Ego and Mechanisms of Defense. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kernbergs OF:Borderline Personality Organization. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 15:641–685, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bond M, Sagala Vaillant J: An empirical study of the relationship between diagnosis and defense style.Arch Gen Psychiat 43:285–288, 1986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karasu T, Skodol A: Sixth axis for DSM-III: psychodynamic evaluation.Am J Psychiat 137:607–610, 1980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, R.J., Ryst, E. & Steiner, H. Temperament as a correlate of adolescent defences mechanisms. Child Psych Hum Dev 27, 105–114 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353804

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353804

Key words

Navigation