Skip to main content
Log in

Prescriptive decision science: Problems and opportunities

  • Part V Helping People To Make Good Decisions
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D.E. Bell, Regret in decision making under uncertainty, Oper. Res. 30(1982)961.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.V. Brown, An essay on prescriptive decision science: The normative tempered by the descriptive, Decision Science Consortium, Inc., Reston, VA (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.V. Brown, Toward a prescriptive science and technology of decision-aiding, Ann. Oper. Res., this volume.

  4. S.H. Chew and K.R. MacCrimmon, Alpha-nu choice theory: A generalization of expected utility theory, Working Paper 669, Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.R. Cohen,Heuristic Reasoning about Uncertainty: An AI Approach (Pitman, Boston, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.W. Fischer, N. Damodaran, K.B. Laskey and D. Lincoln, Preferences for proxy attributes, Manag. Sci. 33(1987)198.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.W. Fischer and S. Hawkins, Preference reversals in multiattribute decision making: Scale compatibility, strategy compatibility, and the prominence effect, Working Paper, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.W. Fischer, M.S. Kamlet, S. Fienberg and D. Schkade, Risk preferences for gains and losses in multiple objective decision making, Manag. Sci. 32(1986)1065.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic and S. Lichtenstein, Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation, J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4(1978)330.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.C. Fishburn, Nontransitive measurable utility, J. Mathematical Psychology 26(1982)31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.T. Fong, D.H. Krantz and R.E. Nisbett, The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems, Cognitive Psychology 18(1986)253.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.M. Grether and C.R. Plott, Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon, Amer. Econ. Rev. 69(1979)623.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Heckerman, Probabilistic interpretations for MYCIN's certainty factors, in:Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, ed. L.N. Kanal and J.F. Lemmer (North-Holland, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Henrion, Should we use probability in uncertain inference systems?,Proc. 8th Ann. Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.C. Hershey, H.S. Kunreuther and P.J.H. Schoemaker, Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions, Manag. Sci. 28(1982)936.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.A. Howard, The foundations of decision analysis, IEEE Trans. on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC-4(1968)211.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk, Econometrica 47(1979)262.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Choices, values, and frames, American Psychologist 4(1984)341.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.L. Keeney, Identifying and structuring values, Working Paper, Systems Science Department, Institute of Safety and Systems Management, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.L. Keeney and C.W. Kirkwood, Group decision making using a cardinal social welfare function, Manag. Sci. 22(1975)430.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa,Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Lichtenstein and P. Slovic, Reversals of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions, J. Experimental Psychology 89(1971)46.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D.V. Lindley, A. Tversky and R.V. Brown, On the reconciliation of probability assessments (with discussion), J. Roy. Stat. Assoc. 142(1979)146.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Marschak and R. Radner,Economic Theory of Teams (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Raiffa,Decision Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Raiffa,The Art and Science of Negotiation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Ross, The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem, Amer. Econ. Rev. 63(1973)134.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.D. Schachter, Evaluating influence diagrams, Oper. Res. 34(1986)871.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E.H. Shortliffe and B.G. Buchanan, A model of inexact reasoning in medicine, Mathematical Biosciences 23(1975)351.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D.J. Spiegelhalter, A statistical view of uncertainty in expert systems, in:AI and Statistics, ed. W. Gale (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1986) pp. 17–55.

    Google Scholar 

  31. W.G. Stillwell, D. von Winterfeldt and R.S. John, Comparing hierarchical and nonhierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multiattribute value models, Manag. Sci. 33(1987)442.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Thaler, Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, J. Economic Behavior and Organization 1(1980)39.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 211(1981)453.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Tversky, S. Sattath and P. Slovic, Contingent weighting in judgment and choice, Psychological Review 95(1988)371.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Costs and payoffs in perceptual research, Pyschological Bulletin 19(1982)609.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, G.W. Prescriptive decision science: Problems and opportunities. Ann Oper Res 19, 489–497 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283537

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283537

Keywords

Navigation