Abstract
“Destruction of cultural resources has increased dramatically in the last quarter of the 20th century as a result of two forces: first, development and construction, and second, the astonishing explosion of demand for “primitive” and prehistoric art.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archaeology, 1991, Protecting the Peten: Archaeology, v. 44, no. 4, p. 20.
Arnold, Bettina, 1992, The past as propaganda: Archaeology, v. 45, no. 4, p. 30–37.
Brody, J.J., 1977, Mimbres painted pottery: Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, 253 p.
Cleere, Henry, 1989a, Archaeological heritage management in the modern world: London, Unwin-Hyman, 318 p.
—, 1989b, Introduction: The rationale of archaeological heritage management,in Cleere, Henry, ed., Archaeological heritage management in the modern world: London, Unwin-Hyman, p. 1–19.
Clifford, James, 1988, The predicament of culture: Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 318 p.
Di Giorgio, Roberta, 1993, Salvaging ruins in Jordan: Archaeology, v. 46, no. 3, p. 23–24.
Elia, R.J., 1993, A seductive and troubling work: Archaeology, v. 46, no. 1, p. 64–69.
Fagan, Brian, 1989, Foreword,in Messenger, P.M., ed., The ethics of collecting cultural property: Whose culture? Whose property?: Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, p. xv-xvii.
Flood, Josephine, 1989, ‘Tread softely for you tread on my bones’: The development of cultural resource management in Australia, in Cleere, H.F., ed., Archaeological heritage management in the modern world: London, Unwin-Hyman, p. 79–102.
Frazier, Deborah, 1993, Looters of the artifacts: Denver, Rocky Mountain News, May 9, p. 8A, 28–30A.
Garfield, Donald, 1992, Saving grace: Museum News, v. 71, no. 3, p. 42–47.
Goldstein, Lynne, and Kintigh, Keith, 1990, Ethics and the reburial controversy: American Antiquity, v. 55, no. 3, p. 585–591.
Gray, D.D., 1993, Champion of aboriginal art: Archaeology, v. 46, no. 4, p. 44–47.
Harris, Leo J., 1989, From the collector's perspective: The legality of importing pre-Columbian art and artifacts, in Messenger, P.M., ed., The ethics of collecting cultural property: Whose culture? Whose property?: Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, p. 155–175.
Henson, F.G., 1989, Historical development and attendant problems of cultural resource management in the Philippines, in Cleere, Henry, ed., Archaeological heritage management in the modern world: London, Unwin-Hyman, p. 109–117.
Herscher, Ellen, 1989, International control efforts: Are there any good solution?in Messenger, P.M., ed., The ethics of collecting cultural property—Whose culture? Whose property?: Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, p. 117–128.
Hoffman, T.L., 1991, Stewards of the past: Preserving Arizona's archaeological resources through positive public involvement, in Smith, G.S., and Ehrenhard, J.E., ed., Preserving the past: Boca Raton, CRC Press, p. 253–260.
Howell, C.L., 1992, Daring to deal with Huaqueros: Archaeology, v. 45, no. 3, p. 56–58.
Hoving, Thomas, 1993, Making the mummies dance: New York, Simon and Schuster, 348 p.
Hutt, Sherry, Elwood, W., and McAllister, M.E., 1992, Archaeological resource protection: Washington, D.C., The Preservation Press, National Trust for Historic Preservation, 179 p.
King, T.F., 1991, Some dimensions of the pothunting problem,in Smith, G.S., and Ehrenhard, J.E., ed., Protecting the past: Boca Raton, CRC Press, p. 83–92.
King, T.F., [n.d.], Looters or lovers—Studying the non-archaeological use of archaeological resources: Prepared for the Society for American Archaeology, 65 p.
Knudson, Ruthann, 1989, North America's threatened heritage: Archaeology, v. 42, no. 1, p. 71–73.
Kristiansen, Kristian, 1989, Perspectives on the archaeological heritage: History and future,in Cleere, Henry, ed., Archaeological heritage management in the modern world: London, Unwin-Hyman, p. 23–26.
LeBlanc, S.A., 1983, The Mimbres people: London, Thames and Hudson, p. 183.
Lekson, S.H., 1990, The Southwest's remarkable Mimbres people: Archaeology, v. 43, no. 6, p. 44–48.
Lipe, William, 1974, A conservation model for American archaeology: The Kiva, v. 39, no. 1–2, p. 213–43.
—, 1984, Value and meaning in cultural resources,in Cleere, Henry, ed., Approaches to the archaeological heritage: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 1–11.
McGimsey, C.R., 1972, Public archaeology: New York and London, Seminar Press, 265 p.
McManamon, F.P., 1992, Managing America's archaeological resources,in Wandsnider, LuAnn, ed., Quandaries and quests, visions of archaeology's future: Carbondale, Occasional Paper No. 20, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, p. 25–40.
Meyer, Karl, 1973, The plundered past: New York, Atheneum, 353 p.
Min, Zhuang, 1989, The administration of China's archaeological heritage,in Cleere, Henry, ed., Archaeological heritage management in the modern world: London, Unwin-Hyman, p. 102–108.
Muller, Scott, 1992, Iced mummy: Archaeology, v. 45, no. 3, p. 24.
Munson, Cheryl Ann, Jones, M.M., and Fry, R.E., 1993, General electric mound and ARPA-current status: Society for American Archaeology Bulletin, v. 11, no. 3, p. 3–4.
Nickens, P.R., 1991, The destruction of archaeological sites and data,in Smith, G.S., and Ehrenhard, J.E., ed., Protecting the past: Boca Raton, CRC Press, p. 73–82.
Parker, P.L., and King, T.F., 1990, Guidelines for evaluating and documenting traditional cultural properties: Washington, D.C., National Register Bulletin 38, National Park Service, Interagency Resources Division, 22 p.
Pendergast, David, and Graham, Elizabeth, 1989, The battle for the Maya past: The effects of international looting and collecting in Belize,in Messenger, P.M. ed., The ethics of collecting cultural property: Whose culture? Whose property?: Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, p. 51–60.
Price, M.H., 1991, Disputing the dead, U.S. law on aboriginal remains and grave goods: Columbia, University of Missouri Press, 136 p.
Renfrew, Colin, 1991, The Cycladic spirit—Masterpieces from the Nicholas P. Goulandris Collection: New York: Harry N. Abrams, 208 p.
—, 1993, Collectors are the real looters: Archaeology, v. 46, no. 3, p. 16–17.
Rogge, A.E., 1991, Teaching with archaeology—An Arizona program,in Smith, G.S., and Ehrenhard, J.E., ed., Protecting the past: Boca Raton, CRC Press, p. 129–134.
Shestack, Alan, 1989, The museum and cultural property: The transformation of institutional ethics,in Messenger, P.M., ed., The ethics of collecting cultural property: Whose culture? Whose property?: Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, p. 93–102.
Silko, L.M., 1987, Landscape, history, and the Pueblo imagination,in Halpern, Daniel, ed., On nature—Nature, landscape, and natural history: San Francisco, North Point Press, p. 83–94.
Simmons, A.H., 1992, Global cultural resource archaeology in the early twenty-first century,in Wandsnider, LuAnn, ed., Quandaries and quests, visions of archaeology's future: Carbondale, Occasional Paper No. 20, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, p. 79–97.
Smardz, Karolyn, 1991, Teaching people to touch the past: Archaeology in the Toronto school system,in Smith, G.S., and Ehrenhard, J.E., ed., Protecting the past: Boca Raton, CRC Press, p. 135–142.
Smith, G.S., and Ehrenhard, J.E., 1991, Protecting the past: CRC Press, Boca Raton, 314p.
Swentzell, Rina, 1990, Remembering Tewa Pueblo houses and spaces: Native peoples, v. 3, no. 2, p. 6–15.
U.S. Information Agency, 1993, Looting, theft, and smuggling, a report to the President and the Congress, 1983–1993: Cultural Property Advisory Committee, United States Information Agency, 28 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
On the cover: Rock art of the Mimbres Culture at the Pony Hills site in south-west New Mexico. Similar rock art nearby has been destroyed by pistol shots or chipped out and illegally sold. Photo by Andrew Gulliford, Public History Program, Middle Tennessee State University.
For the purposes of Legacy, the term “cultural resource” refers to both archeological and architectural resources. For archaeology, it includes, but is not limited to, traditions, lifeways, cultural and religious practices, and other institutions to which a community, neighborhood, Native American tribe, or other group ascribes cultural significance, together with any artifacts and real property associated with such elements. For architecture, it includes, but is not limited to, buildings, sites, districts, structures, or objects, landscapes, and vistas. In addition, the term encompasses historic documents and relics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cameron, C.M. The destruction of the past: Nonrenewable cultural resources. Nat Resour Res 3, 6–24 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261713
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261713