Skip to main content
Log in

Network reoptimization procedures for multiobjective network probelems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Network models are attractive because of their computational efficiency. Network applications can involve multiple objective analysis. Multiple objective analysis requires generating nondominated solutions in various forms. Two general methods exist to generate new solutions in continuous optimization: changing objective function weights and inserting objective bounds through constraints. In network flow problems, modifying weights is straightforward, allowing use of efficient network codes. Use of bounds on objective attainment levels can provide a more controlled generation of solutions reflecting tradeoffs among objectives. To constrain objective attainment, however, would require a side constrained network code, sacrificing some computational efficiency for greater model flexibility. We develop reoptimization procedures for the side constrained problem and use them in conjunction with simplex-based techniques. Our approach provides a useful tool for generating solutions allowing greater decision maker control over objective attainments, allowing multiobjective analysis of large-scale problems. Results are compared with solutions obtained from the computationally more attractive weighting technique. Reoptimization procedures are discussed as a means of more efficiently conducting multiple objective network analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Srinivasan and G.L. Thompson, Accelerated algorithms for labeling and relabeling of trees, with applications to distribution problems, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 19, 4(1972)712.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Srinivasan and G.L. Thompson, Benefit-cost analysis of coding techniques for the primal transportation algorithm, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 20, (1973)194.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Kennington and R. Helgason,Algorithms for Network Programming (Wiley, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Chen and R. Saigal, A primal algorithm for solving a capacitated network flow problem with additional linear constraints, Networks 7(1977)59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Roy and P. Vincke, Multicriteria analysis: Survey and new directions, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 8(1981)207.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.W. Evans, An overview of techniques for solving multiobjective mathematical programs, Management Science 30(1984)1268.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.E. Rosenthal, Principles of multiobjective optimization, Decision Sciences 16(1985)133.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.E. Steuer,Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (Wiley, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Ziontz and J. Wallenius, Identifying efficient vectors: Some theory and computational results, Oper. Res. 28(1980)788.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.E. Steuer, An interactive multiple objective linear programming procedure, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 6(1977)225.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Srinivasan and G.L. Thompson, Algorithms for minimizing total cost bottleneck time and bottleneck shipment in transportation problems, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 23 (1976)567.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y.Y. Haimes, W. Hall and H. Freedman,Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resource Systems: The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Klingman and N. Phillips, Topological and computational aspects of preemptive multicriteria military personnel assignment problems, Management Science 30(1984)1362.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.T. Liang and T.J. Thompson, A large-scale personnel assignment model for the Navy, Decision Sciences 18, 2(1987)234.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Benayoun, O. Larichev, J. de Montgolfier and J. Tergny, Linear programming with multiple objective functions: The method of constraints, Automatic and Remote Control 32(1971)1257.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Ali, E. Allen, R. Barr and J. Kennington, Reoptimization procedures for bounded variable primal simplex network algorithms, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 23(1986)256.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Hellerman and D. Rarick, Reinversion with the preassigned pivot procedure, Math. Progr. 1(1971)195.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Glover, D. Karney and D. Klingman, Implementation and computational comparisons of primal, dual and primal-dual computer codes for minimum cost network flow problems, Networks 4(1974)191.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Klingman, A. Napier and J. Stutz, NETGEN: A program for generating large-scale minimum cost flow network problems, Management Science 20(1974)814.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.S. Barr, F. Glover and D. Klingman, Enhancements of spanning tree labeling procedures for network optimization, INFOR 17(1979)16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, D.L., Shetty, B., Venkataramanan, M.A. et al. Network reoptimization procedures for multiobjective network probelems. Ann Oper Res 20, 219–232 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216930

Keywords

Navigation