Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical evaluation of qualitative Hennigian analyses of protein electrophoretic data

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an empirical evaluation of a qualitative approach to construction of phylogenetic trees from protein-electrophoretic data, we have employed Hennigian cladistic principles to generate molecular trees for waterfowl, rodents, bats, and other phylads. This procedure of tree construction is described in detail. Branching structures of molecular trees produced by three different algorithms were compared against those of “model” classifications previously proposed by other systematists. In each case, the qualitative cladistic trees provided fits to model phylogenies which were strong and as good or better than those resulting from phenetic-clustering or distance-Wagner trees based on manipulation of quantitative values in matrices of genetic distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams EN III (1972) Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Syst Zool 21:390–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC, Patton JC, Aquadro CF (1980a) Evolutionary genetics of birds. I. Relationships among North American thrushes and allies. The Auk 97:135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC, Patton JC, Aquadro CF (1980b) Evolutionary genetics of birds. II. Conservative protein evolution in North American sparrows and relatives. Syst Zool 29:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC, Patton JC, Aquadro CF (1980c) Comparative molecular evolution in New World warblers (Parulidae) and rodents (Cricetinae). J Heredity 71:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose FC (1976) Ducks, Geese and Swans of North America. Stockpole Books, Morrison, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacour J, Mayr E (1945) The family Anatidae. Wilson Bull 57: 3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS (1972) Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris JS (1974) A comment on evolution in theDrosophila obscura species group. Evolution 28:158–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman CG, Wilson AC, Nakanishi M (1971) A biochemical approach towards the study of reptilian phylogeny: evolution of serum albumin and lactic dehydrogenase. Syst Zool 20: 167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ Illinois Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard H (1964) Fossil Anseriformes. In: Delacour J (ed) The Waterfowl of the World, Vol 4, Country Life Ltd, London, pp 233–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard PA (1968) Waterfowl. Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley CH, Fitch WM (1974) An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol 3:161–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich MF (1978) Taxonomic congruence. Syst Zool 27: 143–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich MF, Johnson MS (1976) Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution. Syst Zool 25:260–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Amer Nat 106:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1975) Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton JC, Baker RJ, Avise JC (1981) Biochemical evolution in Peromyscine rodents. In: Smith MH, Joule J (eds) Mammalian Population Genetics, Univ Georgia Press, pp 288–308

  • Prager EM, Wilson AC (1978) Construction of phylogenetic trees for proteins and nucleic acids: empirical evaluation of alternative matrix methods. J Mol Evol 11:129–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers JS (1972) Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. Studies in Genetics VII, Univ Texas Publ 7213: 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ, Sokal RR (1980) Comments on taxonomic congruence. Syst Zool 29:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer AS (1966) Vertebrate Paleontology. Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1972) A comparative study of the egg-white proteins of non-passerine birds. Peabody Mus Nat Hist Bull 39, Yale Univ, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical Taxonomy. WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Throckmorton LH (1978) Molecular phylogenetics. In: Foote RH, Knutson L, Lentz PL (eds) Biosystematics in Agriculture, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 221–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley EO (1981) Phylogenetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AC, Carlson SC, White TJ (1977) Biochemical Evolution. Ann Rev Biochem 46:573–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1962) Molecular disease, evolution and genic heterogeneity. In: Kasha M, Pullman N (eds) Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patton, J.C., Avise, J.C. An empirical evaluation of qualitative Hennigian analyses of protein electrophoretic data. J Mol Evol 19, 244–254 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099972

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099972

Key words

Navigation