Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible covariate effects in the proportional hazards model

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The proportional hazards model is frequently used in analyzing the results of clinical trials, when it is often the case that the outcomes are right-censored. This model allows one to measure treatment effects and simultaneously identify and adjust for prognostic factors that might influence the outcome. In this paper, we outline a class of semiparametric models that allows one to model prognostic factors nonlinearly, and have the data suggest the form of their effect. The methods are illustrated in an analysis of data from a breast cancer clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meinert CL: Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct, and Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simon R: Importance of prognostic factors in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treatment Reports 68:185–192, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cox DR: Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc [B] 34:187–200, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tibshirani R: A Plain Man's Guide to the Proportional Hazards Model. Clin Invest Med 5:63–68, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ: Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. deBoor C: A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sleeper LA, Harrington DP: Regression splines in the Cox model with application to covariate effects in liver disease. J Am Stat Assoc 85:941–949, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Therneau T: S functions for modelling survival data, section S of statlib@lib.stat.cmu.edu, 1992.

  10. Becker R, Chambers J, Wilks A: The S Language. Wadsworth, 1988.

  11. Chambers JM, Hastie TJ: Statistical Models in S. Wadsworth, 1991.

  12. Eubank RL: Spline Smoothing and Nonparametric Regression. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Almudevar T, Tibshirani R: GAIM Users Guide. S.N. Tibshirani Enterprises, Inc., 1991.

  14. Taylor SG, Knuiman MW, Sleeper LA, Olson JE, Tormey DC, Gilchrist KW, Falkson G, Rosenthal SN, Carbone PP, Cummings FJ: Six-year results of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial of observation versus CMFP versus CMFPT in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 7:879–889, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hastie, T., Sleeper, L. & Tibshirani, R. Flexible covariate effects in the proportional hazards model. Breast Cancer Res Tr 22, 241–250 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840837

Key words

Navigation