Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between classic-differential and automatic shunt functioning on the basis of infusion tests

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Infusion tests were performed in order to examine cereospinal compensatory ability in two groups of patients with impaired compensation, subjected to shunt implantation. The functioning of the classic differential shunts was compared to the automatically (Orbis-Sigma) functioning shunts. The reference group, with intact compensatory parameters is also presented.

The influence of different types of shunts on the intracranial compensation ability was compared. Automatic shunts produce less decrease in the resorption resistance of CSF in the post-shunted examination than the classic differential shunts.

Classic differential shunts disturb the mono-exponential character of the pressure-volume relationship in a higher degree than automatic shunts.

Shunt functioning models were proposed as well as the method of detection of eventual recovery to the normal resorption reserve. This method can be applied only to patients with automatic shunts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avezaat CJJ, Eijndhoven JHM van (1984) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and craniospinal dynamics. A theoretical, clinical and experimental study. Thesis. Erasmus University Rotterdam. A Jongbloed en Zoon Publishers, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  2. Czosnyka M, Duda M, Darwaj Pet al (1989) Software for neurosurgery and intensive care for IBM PC. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) ICP VII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 84

    Google Scholar 

  3. Di Rocco C, Caldarelli M, Maira Get al (1977) The study of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in apparently “arrested” hydrocephalus in children. Child's Brain 3: 359–374

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein F (1984) Increased intracranial pressure in hydrocephalic children with functioning shunts: a complication of shunt dependency. In: Shapiro K, Marmarou A, Portnoy H (eds) Hydrocephalus. Raven Press, New York, pp 315–321

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fried A, Shapiro K (1986) Subtle deterioration in shunted childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 65: 211–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham P, Howman R, Johnston I (1983) Evaluation of CSF shunt patency by means of technetium -99m DTPA. J Neurosurg 57: 262–269

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experiences with the antisiphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61: 156–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hara M, Kadowaki Ch, Konishi Yet al (1983) A new method for measuring cerebrospinal fluid flow in shunts. J Neurosurg 58: 557–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marmarou A (1973) A theoretical and experimental evaluation of the cerebrospinal fluid system. PhD thesis, Drexel University

  10. Ruge JR, Cenello LJ, McLone DG (1985) Pneumocephalus in patients with CSF shunts. J Neurosurg 63: 532–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saint-Rose C, Hooven MD, Hirsch JF (1987) A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 66: 213–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schutz H, Ter Brugge K, Chin Met al (1983) Determination of CSF shunt patency with a lumbar infusion test. J Neurosurg 58: 553–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada H (1982) A flow-regulating device to control differential pressure in CSF shunt systems. J Neurosurg 57: 570–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czosnyka, M., Maksymowicz, W., Batorski, L. et al. Comparison between classic-differential and automatic shunt functioning on the basis of infusion tests. Acta neurochir 106, 1–8 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01809325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01809325

Keywords

Navigation