Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous epidural neurostimulation in modulation of paraplegic spasticity

Six case reports

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Six cases of paraplegic, post-traumatic spasticity, alleviated by percutaneous epidural neurostimulation with temporary or permanent implanted neuroelectrodes from the L1 to L4 intervertebral levels are presented. Modulation of this spasticity and secondary beneficial physiological effects were achieved, including regulation of bowel regimens, production of sweating and piloerection below the level of the lesion, and morning erections. The main advantages of percutaneous epidural neurostimulation in modulating spasticity are the avoidance ofdestructive neurosurgical procedures, the regulation of secondary physiological and autonomic responses, the avoidance of antispasticity medications, and the reversibility of the neurostimulation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook, A. W., Electrical stimulation in multiple sclerosis. Hospital PracticeII (1976), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, A. W., Vascular disease of the extremities. N.Y. State J. Med.76 (1976), 366–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, A. W., Weinstein, S. P., Chronic dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis. N.Y. State J. Med.73 (1973), 2868–2872.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dieckmann, G., Loew, F., Palleske, H., Neurosurgical possibilities in the treatment of spastic paresis. Reconstruction Surgery and Traumatology13 (1972), 2–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dooley, D. M., Demyelinating, degenerative, and vascular disease. NeurosurgeryI (1977), 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dooley, D. M., Kasprak, M., Modification of blood flow to the extremities by electrical stimulation of the nervous system. South Med. J.69 (1976), 1304–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ilis, L. S., Oygar, A. E., Sedgwick, E. M., Sabbahi Awadalla, M. A., Dorsal-column stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet, June 26 (1976), 1383–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khalili, A. A., Betts, H. B., Peripheral nerve block with phenol in the management of spasticity: indications and complications. JAMA200 (1967), 1155–1157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lourie, H., Vanasupa, P., Comments on the use of intraspinal phenolpantopaque for relief of pain for spasticity. J. Neurosurg.20 (1963), 60–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MacCarthy, C. S., The treatment of spastic paraplegia by selective spinal cordectomy. J. Neurosurg.11 (1954), 539–545.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, J., Davis, L., Studies upon spinal, cord injuries. III. Altered reflex activity. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.86 (1947), 42–477.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melzack, R., Wall, P. D., Pain mechanism: A new theory. Science150 (1965), 971–979.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nashold, B. S., Friedman, H., Glenn, J. F., Grimes, H. J., Burry, W. F., Avery, R., Electromicturition in paraplegia. Arch. Surg.104 (1972), 195–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Munro, D., Anterior rhizotomy for spastic paraplegia. NEJM233 (1945), 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen, E., Spasticity-mechanism, measurement, and management, pp. 36–53. Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C Thomas. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pollock, L. J., Defects in regulatory mechanisms of autonomic function in injuries to the spinal cord. J. Neurophysiol.14 (1951), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson, R. R., McLone, D. G., Percutaneous epidural neurostimulation in paraplegic spasticity. Surg. Neurol.9 (1978), 153–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruch, T. C., Patton, H. D., Neurophysiology, pp. 188–205. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruge, D. A., Spinal cord injuries, pp. 135–160. Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C Thomas. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  20. carff, J. E., Peel, J. L., Factors causing massive spasm following transsections of the spinal cord in man. J. Neurophysiol. (1946), 285–295.

  21. Sheldon, C. H., Bors, E., Subarachnoid alcohol block in paraplegia. Its beneficial effect on mass reflexes and bladder dysfunction. J. Neurosurg.5 (1948), 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sweet, W. H., Wespic, J. G., Stimulation of pain suppressor mechanism a critique of some current methods. Advances in Neurol.4 (1974), 737–747.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tarlov, J. M., Deafferentation to relieve spasticity or rigidity: reasons for failure in some cases of paraplegia. J. Neurosurg.25 (1966), 270–274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thoden, U., Krainick, J. U., Strassburg, H. M., Zimmerman, H., Influence of dorsal column stimulation (DCS) on spastic movement disorders. Acta Neurochir. (Wien)39 (1977), 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, R.R., Cerullo, L.J., McLone, D.G. et al. Percutaneous epidural neurostimulation in modulation of paraplegic spasticity. Acta neurochir 49, 235–243 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01808963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01808963

Keywords

Navigation