Abstract
For a given undirected graphG=(V, Г) withn vertices we define four norms on ℝn, namely
, where ℰ (resp.
) stands for the family of all maximal cliques inG (resp.\(\tilde G\), the complement ofG). The goal of this note is to demonstrate the usefulness of some notions and techniques from functional analysis in graph theory by showing how Theorem 2.1 (G is ℒ-perfect if and only if the norms
are equal) together with the reflexivity of the space ℝn equipped with either of the norms above easily yield one new result (Theorem 2.2) and two known characterizations of perfect graphs (Theorems 2.3–2.4). Namely, Theorem 2.2 provides a characterization of ℒ-perfection that is strongly related to that of Lovász (1972). It implies that the Lovász inequality is exactly the classical Schwartz inequality for the space (ℝn, ∥·∥ℰ) restricted to (0, 1) vectorsx, y satisfyingx = y. Theorem 2.3 is well known as the Perfect Graph Theorem, while Theorem 2.4, due to V. Chvátal and D.R. Fulkerson, characterizes ℒ-perfection of a graphG in terms of the equality between the vertex packing polytope ofG and the fractional vertex packing polytope ofG.
References
V. Chvátal, “On certain polytopes associated with graphs,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory Ser. B 18 (1975) 138–154.
N. Dunford and J.T. Schwartz,Linear Operators, Part I (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1958).
D.R. Fulkerson, “Blocking and antiblocking pairs of polyhedra,”Mathematical Programming 1 (1971) 168–194.
L. Lovász, “A characterization of perfect graphs,” (Journal of Combinatorial Theory Ser. B 13 (1972) 95–98.
L. Lovász and M.D. Plummer,Matching Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986).
N. Padberg, “Almost integral polyhedra related to certain combinatorial optimization problems,”Linear Algebra and its Applications 15 (1976) 68–88.
A.E. Taylor and D.C. Lay,Introduction to Functional Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaremba, L.S. Perfect graphs and norms. Mathematical Programming 51, 269–272 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01586938
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01586938