Abstract
This study examines the motivational factors contributing to course selection in a sample of students enrolled in an intensive three-week academic experience for exceptionally talented adolescents. Our sample included 947 gifted adolescents, of whom 3.7% were Black, 73.5% were White, 2.2% Hispanic, 0.1% Native American, 19.8% Asian, and 0.6% categorized themselves as “other.” Girls and boys selected different types of classes, with course participation falling along traditional gender-stereotyped lines. Boys and girls both performed exceptionally well, and said they chose their course because the subject was interesting, useful for future goals, and challenging. Females more often than males enrolled in classes because they perceived them as challenging, different from usual, not offered at school, and as making them more well-rounded. Males more often than females tended to select classes because they thought they would do well and/or because they viewed these classes as being useful for future schooling or career. However, these gender differences varied by the type of course the students took. The resulting complex picture of students' motivations is discussed in terms of the need to specify both the contexts in which males and females make their academic choices, and the interactive determinants of their motivations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, J. M. (1985). A national assessment of participation and achievement of women in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.),Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?Science, 210 1262–1264.
Chipman, S. F., & Wilson, D. M. (1985). Understanding mathematics course enrollment and mathematics achievement: A synthesis of the literature. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.),Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eccles (Parsons), J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.),Achievement and achievement motivation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Ethington, C. A., & Wolfle, L. M. (1988). Women's selection of quantitative undergraduate fields of study: Direct and indirect influences.American Educational Research Journal, 25 157–175.
Goldstein, D., & Stocking, V. B. (1994). TIP studies of gender differences in talented adolescents. In E. A. Hany & K. A. Heller (Eds.),Competence and responsibility (Vol. 2). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Goldstein, D., & Wagner, H. (1993). After school programs, competitions, school olympics, and summer programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.),International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Lawrie, L., & Brown, R. (1992). Sex stereotypes, school subject preferences and career aspirations as a function of single/mixed-sex schooling and presence/absence of an opposite sex sibling.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62 132–138.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1 61–66.
McTeer, J. H. (1986). Gender differences in relationship to likes and dislikes of four subject areas.High School Journal, 69 260–263.
Meece, J. L., Eccles Parsons, J., Kaczala, C. M., & Goff, S. B. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice.Psychological Bulletin, 91 324–348.
Ormerod, M. B., & Wood, C. (1983). A comparative study of three methods of measuring the attitudes to science of 10- to 11-year-old pupils.European Journal of Science Education, 5 77–86.
Reis, S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females.Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 83–89.
SAS Institute.SAS procedures guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. Cary, NC: Author.
Shemesh, M. (1990). Gender related differences in reasoning skills and learning interests of junior high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 27–34.
Stipek, D. J., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 361–371.
Stocking, V. B., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Course selection and performance of very high ability students: Is there a gender gap?Roeper Review, 15 48–51.
Strauss, S. M. (1988). Girls in the mathematics classroom: What's happening with our best and brightest?Mathematics Teacher, 81 533–537.
Tabor, K. S. (1991). Gender differences in science preferences on starting secondary school.Research Science and Technological Education, 9 245–251.
Van der Geer, J. P. (1993).Multivariate analysis of categorical data: Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, J.S., Stocking, V.B. & Goldstein, D. Gender differences in motivations for course selection: Academically talented students in an intensive summer program. Sex Roles 31, 349–367 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544594
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544594