Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in motivations for course selection: Academically talented students in an intensive summer program

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the motivational factors contributing to course selection in a sample of students enrolled in an intensive three-week academic experience for exceptionally talented adolescents. Our sample included 947 gifted adolescents, of whom 3.7% were Black, 73.5% were White, 2.2% Hispanic, 0.1% Native American, 19.8% Asian, and 0.6% categorized themselves as “other.” Girls and boys selected different types of classes, with course participation falling along traditional gender-stereotyped lines. Boys and girls both performed exceptionally well, and said they chose their course because the subject was interesting, useful for future goals, and challenging. Females more often than males enrolled in classes because they perceived them as challenging, different from usual, not offered at school, and as making them more well-rounded. Males more often than females tended to select classes because they thought they would do well and/or because they viewed these classes as being useful for future schooling or career. However, these gender differences varied by the type of course the students took. The resulting complex picture of students' motivations is discussed in terms of the need to specify both the contexts in which males and females make their academic choices, and the interactive determinants of their motivations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J. M. (1985). A national assessment of participation and achievement of women in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.),Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?Science, 210 1262–1264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, S. F., & Wilson, D. M. (1985). Understanding mathematics course enrollment and mathematics achievement: A synthesis of the literature. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.),Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles (Parsons), J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.),Achievement and achievement motivation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethington, C. A., & Wolfle, L. M. (1988). Women's selection of quantitative undergraduate fields of study: Direct and indirect influences.American Educational Research Journal, 25 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D., & Stocking, V. B. (1994). TIP studies of gender differences in talented adolescents. In E. A. Hany & K. A. Heller (Eds.),Competence and responsibility (Vol. 2). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, D., & Wagner, H. (1993). After school programs, competitions, school olympics, and summer programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.),International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrie, L., & Brown, R. (1992). Sex stereotypes, school subject preferences and career aspirations as a function of single/mixed-sex schooling and presence/absence of an opposite sex sibling.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTeer, J. H. (1986). Gender differences in relationship to likes and dislikes of four subject areas.High School Journal, 69 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Eccles Parsons, J., Kaczala, C. M., & Goff, S. B. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice.Psychological Bulletin, 91 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, M. B., & Wood, C. (1983). A comparative study of three methods of measuring the attitudes to science of 10- to 11-year-old pupils.European Journal of Science Education, 5 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females.Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute.SAS procedures guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. Cary, NC: Author.

  • Shemesh, M. (1990). Gender related differences in reasoning skills and learning interests of junior high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. J., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, V. B., & Goldstein, D. (1992). Course selection and performance of very high ability students: Is there a gender gap?Roeper Review, 15 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. M. (1988). Girls in the mathematics classroom: What's happening with our best and brightest?Mathematics Teacher, 81 533–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, K. S. (1991). Gender differences in science preferences on starting secondary school.Research Science and Technological Education, 9 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Geer, J. P. (1993).Multivariate analysis of categorical data: Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, J.S., Stocking, V.B. & Goldstein, D. Gender differences in motivations for course selection: Academically talented students in an intensive summer program. Sex Roles 31, 349–367 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544594

Keywords

Navigation