Skip to main content
Log in

Combined esophageal and gastric ph-metry in healthy volunteers influence of cable through les and effect of misoprostol

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate whether combined esophageal and gastric pH-metry is feasible without interference due to the transcardial cable, four 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH-metries were carried out in seven healthy volunteers in a randomized order. In two studies only one glass electrode was used. It was placed 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. In the two other studies an additional electrode was placed in the corpus region 10 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter. In order to obtain a wide range of pH values, misoprostol (400 μg) was given at 9am and 9:15pm in two studies. In the two other studies placebo was given. Misoprostol exerted only a weak and short-lasting effect on gastric acidity. The four measuring conditions did not differ with respect to medians of esophageal reflux time and duration of single reflux episodes, Kendall's coefficient of concordance yielded a high reproducibility for both variables (P < 0.0025). Thus, combined esophageal and gastric pH-metry is feasible and highly reproducible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Little AG, DeMeester TR, Skinner DB: Combined gastric and esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Forum 30:351–353, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Little AG, Martinez EI, DeMeester TR, Blough RM, Skinner DB: Duodenogastric reflux and reflux esophagitis. Surgery 96:447–454, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bocquet A, Betrand A-M, Schirrer J, Raffi A: Intérêt de l'enregistrement simultané des pH oesophagien et gastrique chez le nourrisson. Pediatrie 41:17–32, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berezin S, Schwarz SM, Halata MS, Newman LJ: Gastroesophageal reflux secondary to gastrostomy tube placement. Am J Dis Child 140:699–701, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Correnti FS, Little AG, Toccaceli S, Pappalardo G, Pitasi F, Castrini G: Gastroesophageal reflux due to naso-gastric tube.In Diseases of the Esophagus. JR Siewert, AH Hölscher (eds). Berlin, Springer, 1988, pp 1067–1072

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dajani EZ, Driskill DR, Bianchi RG, Collins PW, Pappo R: SC-29333, a potent inhibitor of canine gastric secretion. Am J Dig Dis 21:1049–1057, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunt JN, Smith JL, Jiang CL, Kessler L: Effect of synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and secretion. Dig Dis Sci 28:897–902, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fimmel CJ, Etienne A, Cilluffo T, v Ritter C, Gasser T, Rey J-P, Caradonna-Moscatelli P, Sabbatini F, Pace F, Bühler HW, Bauerfeind P, Blum AL: Long-term gastric pH monitoring: Validation of a new method and effect of H2-antagonists. Gastroenterology 88:1842–1851, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson ES, Hartley HO: Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol 2. Cambridge, University Press, 1972, pp 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Streitberg B, Röhmel J: Exact nonparametrics in APL. Proceedings of the APL conference, Helsinki. New York, ACM 0-89781-137-7/84/006/0313, 1984, pp 313–325

  11. Emde C, Garner A, Blum AL: Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: Current status and recommendations. Gut, 22:1177–1188, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bontempo I, Corazziari E, Tosoni M, Ercole A: Reproducibility of esophageal pH-metric measurements. Gastroenterology 88:1331, 1985 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berges W, Baumgärtner U, Baum J, Ulrich B, Erckenbrecht J, Wienbeck M: Does postoperative gastric intubation promote gastroesophageal reflux? Gastroenterology 84:1103, 1983 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson K-E, Tibbling L: Evaluation of the 24-hour pH test at two different levels of the esophagus.In Esophageal Disorders: Pathophysiology and Therapy. TR DeMeester, DB Skinner (eds). New York, Raven Press, 1985, pp 579–582

    Google Scholar 

  15. Safaie-Shirazi S, DenBesten L, Zike WL: Effects of bile salts on the ionic permeability of the esophageal mucosa and their role in the production of esophagitis. Gastroenterology 68:728–733, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hopewood D, Bateson MC, Milne G, Bouchier IA: Effects of bile acids and hydrogen ion on the fine structure of esophageal epithelium. Gut 22:306–311, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortesini C, Picciani F: Usefulness of combined gastric and esophageal pH monitoring in detecting gastroesophageal alkaline and mixed reflux. Eur Surg Res 16:378–383, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emde C, Cilluffo T, Bauerfeind P, Fimmel CJ, Blum AL: Effect of a slow-release formula of trimoprostil on intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2:135–141, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hawkey CJ, Walt RP: Prostaglandins for peptic ulcer: A promise unfulfilled. Lancet ii:1084–1087, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by Swiss National Foundation grant 3.827.0.86 and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant Em 36/1-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emde, C., Cilluffo, T., Bauerfeind, P. et al. Combined esophageal and gastric ph-metry in healthy volunteers influence of cable through les and effect of misoprostol. Digest Dis Sci 34, 79–82 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536158

Key words

Navigation