Abstract
The psychoanalytic theory of religion has been seriously limited in its development, largely owing to Freud's emphasis on religion's neurotic elements and an overemphasis on the infantile origins of religious development. This paper offers a conceptual framework and advances the thesis, based on contemporary psychoanalytic, developmental theory, that 1) Erikson's concept of epigenesis has applicability across the life span; 2) that beyond-the-self identity is constituent to human maturation and self-completion; 3) that successful adult maturation requires a mirroring-facilitating environment; and 4) that religious values, meanings, images, and communities play an essential role-as-elements of the facilitating environment of later life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Erikson, E.,Identity and the Life-Cycle. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1980.
Freud, S., “Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality”. In Strachey, J., ed. and trans.,The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7). London, Hogarth Press, 1953, pp. 130–243.
Piaget, J.,Biology and Knowledge. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971.
Erikson, E.,Childhood and Society. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1963.
Federn, P.,Ego Psychology and the Psychoses. New York, Basic Books, 1952.
Landis, G., “Ego Boundaries”,Psychological Issues, 1970,6.
Freud, A.; Nagera, H.; and Freud, E., “Metapsychological Assessment of the Adult Personality”,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1965,29, 9; Gedo, J., and Goldberg, A.,Models of the Mind: A Psychoanalytic Theory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973; Wolf, E., “On the Developmental Line of Self-Object Relations”. In Goldberg, A., ed.,Advances in Self Psychology, New York, International Universities Press, 1980, pp. 117–130.
Horowitz, M., “Body Image”,archives of General Psychiatry, 1966,14, 456–460.
Fisher, S., and Cleveland, S.,Body Image and Personality, Princeton, N.J., Van Nostrand, 1958; Fisher, S., “A Further Appraisal of the Body Boundary Concept”,J. Consulting Psychology, 1963,27, 62–74.
Mahler refers to the body boundary as the “rind of the body-self”. Mahler, M., “Perceptual De-differentiation and Psychotic Object Relationship”,International J. Psychoanalysis, 1960,41, 548–553.
Blatt, S., and Ritzler, B., “Thought Disorder and Boundary Disturbance in Psychosis”,J. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974,42, 370–381; Blatt, S., and Wild, C.,Schizophrenia: A Developmental Analysis. New York, Academic Press, 1976; Quinlan, D., and Harrow, M. “Boundary Disturbances in Schizophrenia”,J. Abnormal Psychology, 1974,83, 533–541.
Landis, “Ego Boundaries”,op. cit. Psychological Issues, 1970,6.
Sugarman, A.; Quinlan, D.; and Devenis, L., “Ego Boundary Disturbance in Anorexia Nervosa: Preliminary Findings”,J. Personality Assessment, 1982,46, 455–461.
Kernberg, O.,Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York, Jason Aronson, 1975.
Blatt, S.; Berman, W.; Bloom-Feshbach, S.; Sugarman, A.; Wilber, C.; and Kleber, H., “Psychological Assessment of Psychopathology in Opiate Addicts”,J. Nervous and Mental Disease, 1984,172, 156–165.
Burnham, D.; Gladstone, A.; and Gibson, R.,Schizophrenia and the Need-Fear Dilemma. New York, International Universities Press, 1969; Kernberg,Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism, op. cit.;
Schulz, C., “The Contribution of the Concept of Self-Representation—Object Representation Differentiation to the Understanding of the Schizophrenias”. In Greenspan, S., and Pollock, G., eds.,The Course of Life: Psychoanalytic contributions toward Understanding Personality Development. Adelphi, Md., NIMH, 1980, pp. 543–570; Mahler, “Perceptual De-Differentiation and Psychotic Object Relationship”,; Searles. H.,The Nonhuman Environment in Normal Development and Schizophrenia. New York, International Universities Press, 1960.
Kernberg,.
Kohut, H.,The Analysis of the Self. New York, International Universities Press, 1971; Stolorow, R., “Toward a Functional Definition of Narcissism”,International J. Psychoanalysis, 1975,56, 179–185; Kohut, H., and Wolf, E.S., “The Disorders of the Self and their Treatment”,International J. Psychoanalysis, 1978,59, 413–425.
Blatt, S.J., and Lerner, H., “The Psychological Assessment of Object Representation”,J. Personality Assessment, 1983,47, 7–28; Quinlan and Harrow, “Boundary Disturbances in Schizophrenia”,.
Winnicott, D., “The Theory of the Parent-Infant Relationship”, In Winnicott, D.,The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York, International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.
Blos, P., “The Second Individuation Process of Adolescence”,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1967,22, 162–186; Marcus, J., “The Experience of Separation-Individuation through the Course of Life: Adolescence and Maturity”,J. Amer. Psychoanalytic Association, 1973,21, 155–167; Tabin, J.K.,On the Way to Self: Ego and Early Oedipal Development. New York, Columbia University Press, 1984.
Erikson,Childhood and Society,.
Freud; Nagera; and Freud, “Metapsychological Assessment of the Adult Personality”,.
“Decentering” is a term borrowed from Piaget denoting a perspectival shift away from egocentric perception; where the domain of experience is increasingly contextual and objective, rather than self-centered. The decentering process optimally occurs at crucial transitions across the life-cycle. See Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B.,The Psychology of the Child. New York, Basic Books, 1969, p. 13.
Kegan, R., “A Neo-Piagetian Approach to Object Relations”, In Lee, B., and Noam, G., eds.,Developmental Approaches to the Self. New York, Plenum Press, 1983.
Gutmann, D., “Psychoanalysis and Aging: A Developmental View”. In Greenspan and Pollock, (eds.),.
Brewer, E., “Everyday Life and Transcendence”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Religious Research Association, 1974.
Erikson, E., “Human Strength and the Cycle of Generations”. In Erikson, E.,Insight and Responsibility. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1964.
—,The Life-Cycle Completed. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1982.
—, “Human Strength and the Cycle of Generations”,.
—,Childhood and Society,.
Kernberg, O., “Boundaries and Structures in Love Relations”,J. Amer. Psychoanalytic Association, 1976,25, 81–114.
Erikson, “Human Strength and the Cycle of Generations”,.
The nineteenth-century philosopher Frederich Schleiermacher understood religious experience as “the affective response to the relationships into which the whole of human nature is bound”. Niebuhr, R.,Schleiermacher on Christ and Religion. New York, Scribner's Son, 1964. From this perspective the fullest expression of religious development is mystical experience, that is, the felt identity with the whole. In this vein, Bellah defines religion as “the symbol system that serves to evoke...the felt-whole, that is, the totality that includes subject and object and provides the context in which life and action finally have meaning. ...” Bellah, R.,Beyond Belief. New York, Harper & Row, 1970.
Colarusso, C., and Nemiroff, R.,Adult Development: A New Dimension in Psychodynamic Theory and Practice. New York, Plenum Press, 1981.
Kohut,.
Wolf, E., “On the Developmental Line of Self-Object Relations”, In Goldberg, ed..
Campbell, J.,The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology. New York, Viking Press, 1964.
Kohut, H., “Reflections onadvances in Self Psychology”. In Goldberg, ed.,.
Wolf,.
Lifton, R.,The Broken Connection. New York, Simon and Schuster, 1979.
Hartmann, H.,Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York, International Universities Press, 1939.
Kohut,.
Winnicott, D., “The Capacity to be Alone”. In Winnicott,. New York, International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.
Culture is the holding environment in an ultimate sense. Mediating structures bridge the gap between impersonal “megastructures” of society (e.g., the State) and the private life of the individual. These institutions—family, neighborhood, church or synagogue, and voluntary associations—function proximately as the facilitating matrix of development. Berger, P., and Neuhaus, R.J.,To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy. Washington D.C., American Enterprise Institute, 1977.
Lasch, C.,The Culture of narcissism. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1979.
Reich, A., “Pathological Forms of Self-Esteem Regulation”,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1960,15, 214–232; Stolorow, R., and Lachmann, F., “Death Anxiety, Hypochondriasis, and Depersonalization”. InPsychoanalysis of Developmental Arrests. New York, International Universities Press, 1980.
Freud, S., “Obsessive actions and Religious Practices”. In Strachey, J., ed. and trans.,The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9). London, Hogarth Press, 1960, pp. 117–128;The Future of an Illusion. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1975.
Gedo and Goldberg,. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.
Goldberg,.
Meissner, W.,Psychoanalysis and Religious Experience. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984.
Rizzuto, A.,The Birth of the Living God. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979.
Buckley, P., “Mystical Experience and Schizophrenia”,Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1981,7, 516–521.
Erikson, E., “Reflections on Dr. Borg's Life-cycle”,Daedalus, 1976,105, 1–28.
Tansey, M., and Burke W., “Projective Identification and the Empathic Process”,Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 1985,1, 42–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acklin, M.W. Adult maturational processes and the facilitating environment. J Relig Health 25, 198–206 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534016
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534016