Skip to main content
Log in

A modification to the COSMIC parameterisation using ab initio constrained potential functions

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The H.H non-bonded potential employed in the current COSMIC force field has been contrasted with H.H potentials used in a number of other force fields. Initial conversion of the variety of functions to a Morse format, achieved using a simple graphical fitting procedure, allowed a direct comparison to be made, showing the COSMIC potential to differ considerably from the other potentials. This difference was reflected in the failure of COSMIC to reproduce ab initio and experimental energies for molecules with significant H.H interactions, with particular reference to the energy curves of benzophenone and diphenyl ether. Considerable improvement in these energies is produced by the use of a Morse function originally based on the H.H potential used in MM3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weiner, P.K. and Kollman, P.A., J. Comp. Chem., 2 (1981) 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olafson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S. and Karplus, M., J. Comp. Chem., 40(1983) 187–217.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allinger, N.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99 (1977) 8127–8134.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vinter, J.G., Davis, A. and Saunders, M.R., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 1 (1987) 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham, R.J. and Stolevik, R., Chem. Phys. Lett., 58 (1978) 622–624.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham, R.J. and Stolevik, R., Chem. Phys. Lett., 77 (1981) 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stolevik, R. and Thingstad, O., J. Mol. Struct. Theochem., 106 (1984) 333–353.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaime, C. and Osawa, E., Tetrahedron, 39 (1983) 2769–2778.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ermer, O. and Mason, S.A., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., (1983) 53–54.

  10. Allinger, N.L. and Lii, J.H., J. Comp. Chem., 8 (1987) 1146–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abraham, R.J. and Haworth, I.S., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, in press.

  12. Abraham, R.J. and Haworth, I.S., unpublished results.

  13. Abraham, R.J. and Smith, P.E., J. Comp. Chem., 9 (1988) 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abraham, R.J. and Grant, G.H., J. Comp. Chem., 9 (1988) 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boon, J. and Magre, E.P., Makromol. Chem., 126 (1969) 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fratini, A.V., Cross, E.M., Whitaker, R.B. and Adams, W.W., Polymer, 27 (1986) 861–865.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baraldi, I., Gallineila, E. and Momicchioli, F., J. Chim. Phys., 83 (1986) 655–664.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abraham, R.J. and Haworth, I.S., manuscript in preparation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abraham, R.J., Haworth, I.S. A modification to the COSMIC parameterisation using ab initio constrained potential functions. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 2, 125–135 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01532087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01532087

Key words

Navigation