Skip to main content
Log in

Congruence and attributes of meaning: Community mental health center and vocational rehabilitation personnel

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate similarities and differences between vocational rehabilitation and community mental health center personnel in their perceptions of eight concepts relating to emotional disability, social and vocational adjustment, work, dependence, and agency affiliation, and (2) to provide descriptive information regarding the structure of these helpers' value systems as reflected in their ratings of the eight concepts. Twenty vocational rehabilitation counselors and 20 community mental health workers served as subjects. The semantic differential technique served as the basis for construction of the research instrument. Data were analyzed by means of a two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures. Results indicated that (1) the groups differed in their ratings over all eight concepts, (2) some of the concepts were seen more favorably by both groups than other concepts, but (3) particular concepts did not discriminate between the groups. Findings are discussed and tentative hypotheses are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Feinberg, L. B., & Cohen, J. D. Vocational rehabilitation and the community action program: A study of concepts and meanings.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 1971,13, 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L.A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, J. What's in a name — attitudes toward disabled persons.Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1967,45, 557–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, F. V., Jorgensen, G. O., MacGuffie, R. A., Isreal, D. A., McPhee, W., & Samuelson, C. O. Interpersonal relationships in rehabilitation.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 1968,12, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N.Foundations of behavioral research: Educational, psychological, and sociological inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermann, C. E.History of vocational rehabilitation in America. Minneapolis: Denison, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. The nature and measurement of meaning.Psychological Bulletin, 1952,49, 197–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. R., Greco, M. A. & Kravetz, S. P. Perceptions of work and dependence: A comparison of rehabilitation counselors and social workers.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 1973,17, 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Use of the University of Wisconsin Computer Center was made possible through support of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) through the University of Wisconsin Research Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, K.R., Gottlieb, A.B. & Kravetz, S.P. Congruence and attributes of meaning: Community mental health center and vocational rehabilitation personnel. Community Ment Health J 10, 402–408 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419974

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419974

Keywords

Navigation