Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of coordinated, multidisciplinary ambulatory care on service use, charges, quality of care and patient satisfaction in the elderly

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated a multidisciplinary care center, the Pike Market Clinic (PMC), whose physicians provide and coordinate inpatient and outpatient care for downtown low-income elderly in Seattle. We interviewed users of PMC and their near-neighbors with a 206 item questionnaire to compare their medical and social service use, quality of care, and satisfaction. We then estimated mean annual charges/person for inpatient, outpatient and emergency room services in the two groups. Demographic and health status characteristics were similar in the two groups. PMC patients made significantly more annual visits than neighbors to their primary physicians. Visits to non-primary physicians occurred at the same rate in both groups, but PMC patients were referred more often by their primary physicians. Both emergency room and inpatient use were higher in the neighbor group. Social services were used at the same rate by PMC patients and neighbors. Various indices suggested that quality of care and satisfaction were comparable or superior among PMC patients. Using utilization data, we estimated that neighbors generated charges over $1000/person/year greater than PMC patients. Coordination by PMC providers rather than the availability of multidisciplinary services may be largely responsible for utilization differences between PMC patients and their neighbors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Bureau of the Census:Statistical Abstracts of the United States: 1991 (11th edition.) Washington, DC, 1991. Pp. 13, 15.

  2. U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging:Aging America: Trends and Projections (1987–88 edition). U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. P. 125.

  3. Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians, Long term care of the elderly.Ann Intern Med 100:760–763, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zawadski, RT, The long term care demonstration projects: What are they and why they came into being.Home Health Care Services Quarterly 4: 5–19, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kodner, DL, Mossey, W, Dapello, RDL, New York's “Nursing Home Without Walls”: A provider-based community care program for the elderly.Home Health Care Services Quarterly 4:107–126, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eggert, GM, Bowlyon, JE, Nichols, CW, Gaining control of the long term care system: First returns from the ACCESS experiment.Gerontologist 20:356–363, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss, LJ, Sklar, BW, Project OPEN: A hospital-based long-term care demonstration program for the chronically ill elderly.Home Health Care Services Quarterly 4:127–145, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ansak, M-L, Zawadski, RT, On Lok CCODA: A consolidated model.Home Health Care Services Quarterly 4:147–170, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brill, RS, Horowitz, A, The New York City Home Care Project: A demonstration in coordination of health and social services.Home Health Care Services Quarterly 4: 91–106, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hedrick, SC, Inui, TS, The effectiveness and cost of home care: an information synthesis.Health Serv Res 20: 851–880, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weissert, WG, Cready, CM, Pawelak, JE, The past and future of home- and community-based long-term care.Milbank Q 66:309–388, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aday, LA, Andersen, R, Fleming, GV:A National Survey of Access to Medical Care. Center for Health Administration Studies, Univ. of Chicago, 1977.

  13. Branch, LG, Fowler, FJ:The health care needs of the elderly and chronically disabled in Massachusetts. Survey Research Program Monograph, 1975.

  14. Ware, JE, Snyder, MK, Wright, WR:Scoring instructions for short forms of the patient satisfaction questionnaire. Health Insurance Study. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.

  15. Schneeweiss, R, Ellsbury, K, Hart, LG, Geyman, JP, The economic impact and multiplier effect of a family practice clinic on an academic medical center.JAMA 262:370–375, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heller, TA, Larson, EB and LoGerfo, JP, Quality of ambulatory care of the elderly: An analysis of five conditions.J Am Geriatr Soc 32:782–788, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bellin, SS, Geiger, HJ, Gibson, CD, Impact of ambulatory-health-care services on the demand for hospital beds.N Engl J Med 280:808–812, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hochheiser, LI, Woodward, K, Charney, E, Effect of the neighborhood health center on the use of pediatric emergency departments in Rochester, New York.N Engl J Med 285:148–152, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Master, RJ, Feltin, M, Jainchill, J et al., A continuum of care for the inner city: Assessment of its benefits for Boston's elderly and high risk populations.N Engl J Med 302:1434–1440, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Okada, LM, Wan, TTH, Impact of community health centers and Medicaid on the use of health services.Public Health Rep 95:520–534, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deprez, RD, Pennell, B-E, Libby, MA, The substitutability of outpatient primary care in rural community health centers for inpatient hospital care.Health Serv Res 22:207–233, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Branch, LG:Understanding the health and social service needs of people over age 65. Center for Survey Research, Univ. of Mass., and The Joint Center for Urban Studies, M.I.T. and Harvard Univ., 1977.

  23. Luft, HS, How do health-maintenance organizations achieve their “savings”?N Engl J Med 298:1336–1343, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weil, PA, Comparative costs to the Medicare program of seven prepaid group practices and controls.Milbank Q Summer:339–365, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Manning, WG, Leibowitz, A, Goldberg, GA, Rogers, WH, Newhouse, JP, A controlled trial of the effect of a prepaid group practice on the use of services.N Engl J Med 310:1505–1510, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wan, TTH, The effect of managed care on health services use by dually eligible elders.Med Care 27:983–1001, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas, C, Kelman, HR, Health services use among elderly under alternative health service delivery systems.J Community Health 15:77–92, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Menke, T, Impacts of PPS on Medicare Part B expenditures and utilization for hospital episodes of care.Inquiry 27:114–126, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iglehart, JK, Early experience with prospective payment of hospitals.N Engl J Med 314:1460–1464, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. National Center for Health Statistics:Health, United States, 1986. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 87–1232. Public Health Service.

  31. National Center for Health Statistics, E.J. Graves: Utilization of short-stay hospitals, United States, 1985.Vital and Health Statistics. Series 13, No. 91. DHHS Pub. No.(PHS) 87–1752. Public Health Service. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Laura-Mae Baldwin is Assistant Professor of Family Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Thomas S. Inui is Professor and Chair of Ambulatory Care and Prevention at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Sally Stenkamp is in practice at Kaiser Permanente in Riverside, California.

This research was conducted while the first author was a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar at the University of Washington. The opinions and conclusions in the text are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The authors would like to thank Marilyn Bergner, PhD for her review of this work, Betsy Lieberman for her administrative support at the Pike Market Clinic, Beth Lindeman, MD for her assistance in interviewing and the many elderly who opened their homes to the interviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldwin, LM., Inui, T.S. & Stenkamp, S. The effect of coordinated, multidisciplinary ambulatory care on service use, charges, quality of care and patient satisfaction in the elderly. J Community Health 18, 95–108 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324418

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324418

Keywords

Navigation