Skip to main content
Log in

Risk profile forchlamydia infection in women from public health clinics in New York State

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevalence of chlamydial infection and associated risk factors were studied in 1531 women from ten clinics in New York State excluding New York City. OverallChlamydia infection rates were 13.6%; 17.6% in eight high risk family planning and STD clinics, and 5.7% in two low risk college and private clinics. Risk factors forChlamydia infection included: age <20 years (odds ratio 1.6), use of oral contraceptives (odds ratio 2.0), a history of having more than one sexual partner (odds ratio 1.7) and, in one clinic where data was available, inflammation on Papanicolaou smears (odds ratio 2.1).

These data helped secure funding forChlamydia preventive services and permitted development of a risk profile (score card) ofChlamydia for each age group. Use of such a score card can be most helpful in assigning which patients could benefit most fromChlamydia cultures, especially in those areas where testing is unavailable or too costly to screen all patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCormack WM, Alpert S, McComb DE, Nichols RL, Semine DZ, Zinner SH. Fifteen month study of women infected withChlamydia trachomatis. N Eng J Med300: 123–5, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Washington AE, Johnson RE, Sanders LL.Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States. What are they costing us? JAMA257: 2070–2, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richmond SJ, Paul ID, Taylor PK. Value and feasibility of screening women attending STD clinics for cervical chlamydial infections. Br J Vener Dis56: 92–5, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Handsfield HH, Jasman LL, Roberts PL, Hanson VW, Kothenbeutel RL, Stamm WE. Criteria for selective screening forChlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics. JAMA255: 1730–4, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison RH, Costin M, Meder JB et al. CervicalChlamydia trachomatis infection in university women: Relationship to history, contraception, ectopy, and cervicitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol153: 244–51, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arya OP, Mallinson H, and Goddard AD: Epidemiological and clinical correlates of chlamydial infection of the cervix. Br J Vener Dis57: 118–24, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chacko MR, Lovchik JC:Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexually active adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Pediatrics73: 836–40, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shafer MA, Beck A, Blain B, et al.Chlamydia trachomatis: Important relationships to race, contraception, lower genital tract infection, and Papanicolaou smear. J Pediatr104: 141–6, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Washington AE, Gove S, Schachter J, Sweet RL. Oral Contraceptives,Chlamydia trachomatis infection, and pelvic inflammatory disease. JAMA253: 2246–50, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kinghorn GR and Waugh MA. Oral contraceptive use and prevalence of infection withChlamydia trachomatis in women. Br J Vener Dis57: 187–90, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hipp SS, Han Y, Murphy D. Assessment of Enzyme Immunoassay and Immunofluorescence Tests for Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol25: 1938–43, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chernesky MA, Mahony JB, Castriciano S, Mores M, Stewart IO, Landis SJ, Seidelman W, Sargeant EJ, Leman C. Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. J Infect Dis154: 141–8, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards D, Phillips D, Stancomb S:Chlamydia trachomatis infection at a family planning clinic. N Z Med J98: 333–5, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berg AD, Heidrich EF, Fihn SD et al. Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice; comparison of clinical examination and comprehensive microbiology. JAMA25: 620–5, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tam MR, Stamm WE, Handsfield HH et al. Culture-independent diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies. N Eng J Med310: 1146–50, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones MF, Smith TF, Houglum AJ, Herrmann JE.Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test. J Clin Microbiol20: 465–711, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hipp SS. Laboratory technique for identification ofChlamydia trachomatis. In Sexually Related Infectious Disease. Sun T (Ed.) Yearbook Med Pub, New York 161–71, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sompolinsky D, Richmond S. Growth ofChlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cytochalasin B. Appl Microbiol28: 912–4, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ripa KV, Mårdh P-A. Cultivation ofChlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells. J Clin Microbiol6: 329–31, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease. J Nat Cancer Inst22: 719–48, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cox DR: The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Chapman and Hill Press, 1970, P. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Svennson L, Westrom L, Mårdh P-A.Chlamydia trachomatis in women attending a gynecological outpatients clinic with lower genital tract infection. Br J Vener Dis57: 259–62, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor-Robinson D, Tuffrey M, Falder P. Some aspects of animal models forChlamydia trachomatis genital infection. In Mårdh P-A, Holmes KK, Oriel JD, et al. (Eds.) Chlamydial Infections. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press, 1982. Pp. 375–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stamm WE, Holmes KK:Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the adult. In Holmes KK, Mårdh P-A, Sparling PF, Wiesner PH (Eds.) Sexually Transmitted Diseases. New York: McGraw Hill Press, 1984. Pp. 258–70.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hobson D, Karayiannis P, Byng RE, et al. Quantitative aspects of chlamydial infection of the cervix. Br J Vener Dis56: 156–62, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

All authors are from the New York State Department of Health. Yangsook Han is a research scientist, AIDS Institute; Dale Morse is Director of the Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, Charles Lawrence is chief of the Biometrics Laboratory, Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research; Dennis Murphy is STD program director and Sally Hipp is STD special projects director.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, Y., Morse, D.L., Lawrence, C.E. et al. Risk profile forchlamydia infection in women from public health clinics in New York State. J Community Health 18, 1–9 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321516

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321516

Keywords

Navigation