Skip to main content
Log in

The Instrument Based Program Monitoring Information System and the Indicator Checklist for child care

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child care quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Instrument Based Program Monitoring Information System (IPM) and the Indicator Checklist (IC) are two tools for the state management of child day care services. A methodology for monitoring interviews and site visits to child day care programs is described. An integral feature of IPM is a system of assigning weights to the questions or items so that scores reflect the relative importance of state regulations. An Indicator Checklist is a questionnaire or checklist that contains selected, predictive items from a longer, comprehensive instrument that a state uses to monitor child day care providers' conformance to state day care regulations. An Indicator Checklist contains items that have been determined to be most effective in discriminating between providers that typically receive high overall scores on the comprehensive instrument and providers that typically receive low overall scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, S., Fiene, R. & Douglas, E.Pennsylvania Child Development Program Evaluation Instrument Bureau of Child Development, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. & Steinberg, L. The effects of day care: A critical review,Child Development 1978,49 929–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Class, N. & Orton, R. Day care regulation: The limits of licensing,Young Children, Vol. #2, 1980, September, 12–17.

  • Collins, R. Child care and the states: The comparative licensing study,Young Children, Vol. #2, 1983, July, 3–11.

  • Cohen, M.New York City Indicator Checklist, NYC Agency for Child Development, New York City, 1983.

  • CWLA, Day Care Standards Revisions,Child Welfare League of America, New York City, 1983.

  • Douglas, E. & Fiene, R. Making the almost impossible—possible: Evaluation of a human service (Ecological Paradigm for child care monitoring), paper presented atNational Association for the Education of Young Children, November 1979, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Ferrar, H., Gleason, D. & Smith, B.A State-of-the-Art Report on State Monitoring of Child Care Facilities Social Services Research Institute, Washington, D.C., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiene, R., The two year old: Characteristics and management of his play,Dimensions 1974,2 2, 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiene, R., Current trends in research,Children, 1975, Spring, 15–18.

  • Fiene, R.Child Development Program Evaluation Scale Children's Services Monitoring Consortium, Washington, D.C., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiene, R., Douglas, E., & Kroh, K.Child Development Program Evaluation Bureau of Child Development, Harrisburg, Pa., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiene, R., Douglas, E. & Nixon, M.System Documentation for Pennsylvania's Instrument Based Program Monitoring Information System Children's Services Monitoring Services Consortium, Washington, D.C., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiene, R. & Nixon, M.Instrument Based Program Monitoring System Children's Services Monitoring Consortium, Washington, D.C., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiene, R. & Nixon, M.Indicator Checklist Methodology Children's Services Monitoring Consortium, Washington, D.C., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T. & Clifford, R.Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEW,FIDCR Report of Findings and Recommendations U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I.Lasting Effects After Preschool U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, B.West Virginia Indicator Checklist West Virginia Department of Social Services, Charleston, W.V., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G.Regulation of Early Childhood Programs Washington, D.C.: Day Care and Child Development Council of America, Inc., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G.Alternatives for Regulation of Family Day Care Homes for Children Washington, D.C.: Day Care and Child Development Council of America, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. Regulating early childhood programs in the eighties, unpublished manuscript, 1980.

  • NAEYC, Criteria for quality early childhood programs,National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, D.C., 1983.

  • Peat, Marwick, & Mitchell, Assessment of the inplementation of the indicator checklist for day care centers in West Virginia,Children's Services Monitoring Consortium, September, 1983.

  • Poole, J.Child Development Program Quality Review California State Department of Education, Sacramento, CA., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruopp, R.Children at the Center Cambridge, MA: Abt Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S., Fiene, R., & Woods, L.Kids MicroComputer Software Children's Services Monitoring Consortium, Washington, D.C., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. & Gordon, E.Day Care: Scientific and Social Policy Issues Boston, Massachusetts: Auburn House Publishing Company, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiene, R., Nixon, M. The Instrument Based Program Monitoring Information System and the Indicator Checklist for child care. Child Youth Care Forum 14, 198–214 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113748

Keywords

Navigation