Skip to main content
Log in

The psychological reality of word senses

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tests psychologists' frequent assumption that dictionaries are psychologically realistic models of polysemy in the mental lexicon. Psychologists have not often explored the nature of polysemy, and lexicographers' methods have not involved scientific sampling of usages or informants. It is argued, however, that the lexicographic technique of citation sorting is an effective way of discovering sense differences. Here this technique was used in three tasks involving usage samples for 24 high- and low-frequency nouns varying widely in degree of polysemy in the dictionary. Analyses of agreement within and between subjects showed that subjects consistently judged and substantially agreed upon the major senses of most nouns, but that few nouns in either frequency group were perceived to have more than three significant senses. Additionally, the possibility that larger usage samples will bias people to make more sense groupings was found not to be true, suggesting that the larger number of senses lexicographers create for high-frequency words are not artifacts of larger usage samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. (1975). On putting apples into bottles—A problem of polysemy.Cognitive Psychology, 7, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1981). Basic issues in the development of word meaning. In W. Deutsch (Ed.),The child's construction of language (pp. 341–380). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, R. J., Calzolari, N., Chodorow, M. S., Klavans, J. L., Neff, M. S., & Rizk, O. A. (1987).Tools and methods for computational lexicology (RC 12642, No. 56847). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Grober, E. H., & Zurif, E. B. (1974).A psycholinguistic investigation of polysemy: The meanings of LINE. Unpublished manuscript, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1979).Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1967). Meaning and change of meaning.American Psychologist, 22, 641–651.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, K., & Manning, J. (1989). Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: Semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 577–611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1983).Foundationalism in the philosophy of science and in semantics. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W. (1950).An introduction to probability theory and its applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1983).Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Quinn, J. G. (1976). To define true meaning.Nature, 264, 635–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. J., & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory.Language, 39, 170–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E., & Stone, P. (1975).Computer recognition of English word senses. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurylowitz, J. (1955). [Notes on word meanings].Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 3, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNamara, J. (1971). Parsimony and the lexicon.Language, 47, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1969). A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G. A., Fellbaum, C., Kegl, J., & Miller, K. (1988).Wordnet: An electronic lexical reference system based on theories of lexical memory (Report No. 11). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Science Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words.Scientific American, 258, 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panman, O. (1982). Homonymy and polysemy.Lingua, 58, 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. v. O. (1960).Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R., & Bjork, R. A. (1974). A semantic intepretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 648–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, L. M. (1988). Semantic flexibility and core meaning.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, E. I. (1960). Some variables affecting pattern conception.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary (1975). Springfield, M: G. & C. Merriam.

  • Weinreich, U. (1980).On semantics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. (1953).A general service list of English words with semantic frequencies and a supplementary word-list for the writing of popular science and technology. London: Longmans Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958).Philosophical investigations, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zgusta, L. (1971).Manual of lexicography. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1945). The meaning-frequency relationship of words.Journal of General Psychology, 33, 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949).Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially supported by grants from the Spencer and Sloan Foundations to George A. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jorgensen, J.C. The psychological reality of word senses. J Psycholinguist Res 19, 167–190 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077415

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077415

Keywords

Navigation