Skip to main content
Log in

Differential recognition of geometric isomers by the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boh. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Evidence for only three essential components in aggregation pheromone

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For two decades, the aggregation pheromone of the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boh. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), was thought to consist of four compounds: I [(+)-(Z)-2-isopropenyl-1-methylcyclobutane ethanol]; II [(Z)-3,3-dimethyl-ΔI,β-cyclohexane ethanol]; III [(Z)-3,3-dimethyl-Δ1,α-cyclohexane acetaldehyde); and IV [(E)-3,3-dimethyl-Δ1,α-cyclohexane acetaldehyde). Evidence is presented from behavioral and electrophysiological studies to show that only three of these components, I, II, and IV, are essential for attraction. Competitive field tests, in which each possible three-component blend was tested against the four-component mixture, demonstrated that omission of I, II. or IV resulted in decreased trap captures (P < 0.01). Trap captures by these blends lacking I, II, or IV resembled those by the hexane solvent alone in a similar experiment. However, omission of III did not significantly alter field attractiveness of the blend. Dosage-response curves constructed from electroantennogram responses of both males and females to serial dilutions of III, IV, and a 50∶50 mixture of the geometric isomers III and IV showed both sexes to be 10- to 100-fold more sensitive to IV than III. Data from the electrophysiological studies were consistent with a single acceptor type for the (E)-cyclohexylidene aldehyde, IV, for males, and possibly one or two acceptor types for III and IV for females. Possible roles for the (Z)-cyclohexylidene aldehyde, III, and implications for the pheromonal attractant currently used in boll weevil eradication/suppression programs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brand, J.M. 1976. Bark beetle pheromones: Production of verbenone by a mycangial fungus ofDendroctonus frontalis.J. Chem. Ecol. 2:195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J.M., Bracke, J.W., Markovetz, A.S.J., Wood, D.L., andBrowne, L.E. 1975. Production of verbenol pheromone by bacterium isolated from bark beetles.Nature 254:136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W.H. andMitchell, H.C. 1966. Mating behavior of the boll weevil.J. Econ. Entomol. 59:1503–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W.H. 1983. Ecology of cotton insects with special reference to the boll weevil, pp. 53–70,in R.L. Ridgway, E.P. Lloyd, and W.H. Cross (eds.). Cotton Insect Management with Special Reference to the Boll Weevil. USDA Handbook No. 589.

  • Cross, W.H., Lukefahr, M.J., Fryxell, P.A., andBurke, H.R. 1975. Host plants of the boll weevil.J. Econ. Entomol. 4:19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C. 1979. Electrophysiological investigations of olfaction in bark beetles.Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 52:203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C. 1981. Behavioural and electrophysiological responses of the bark beetle,Ips typographus, to potential pheromone components.Physiol. Entomol. 6:251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C. 1984. Olfaction in the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boh. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Electroantennogram studies.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1759–1785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C. 1986. Orientation of the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boh. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), to pheromone and volatile host compound in the laboratory.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., andBoldt, P.E. 1985. Electroantennogram responses ofTrirhabda bacharides (Weber) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to plant volatiles.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:767–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., andMoorman, E.E. 1987. Role of host plant and sensory environment in maturation of olfactory receptor system of the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis.Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 13:82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., andMori, K. 1989. Receptor chirality and behavioral specificity of the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boh. (Coleoptera: Curlionidae), for its pheromone, (+)-grandisol.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.C., Eischen, F.A., andDietz, A. 1986. Olfactory perception of the sex attractant pheromone of the greater wax moth,Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), by the honey bee,Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J. Entomol. Sci. 21:349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests.Biometrics 11:1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glancey, B.M., andDickens, J.C. 1988. Behavioral and electrophysiological studies with larval rinses of the red imported fire ant,Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:463–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardee, D.D., Cross, W.H., andMitchell, E.B. 1969. Male boll weevils are more attractive than cotton plants to boll weevils.J. Econ. Entomol. 62:165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardee, D.D., Mckibben, G.H., Gueldner, R.C., Mitchell, E.B., Tumlinson, J.H., andCross, W.H. 1972. Boll weevils in nature respond to grandlure, a synthetic pheromone.J. Econ. Entomol. 65:97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardee, D.D., Mckibben, G.H., Rummel, D.R., Huddleston, P.M., andCoppedoe, J.R. 1974. Response of boll weevils to component ratios and doses of the pheromone, grandlure.Environ. Entomol. 3:135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, P.M., Mitchell, E.B., andWilson, N.M. 1977. Disruption of boll weevil communication.J. Econ. Entomol. 70:83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K.-E. 1971. Insect olfaction, pp. 351–431,in L. Beidler, (ed.). Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. IV, Chemical Senses 1. Olfaction. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.C., Mitchell, E.B., Mckibben, G.H., andDavich, T.B. 1964. A sex attractant for female boll weevils from males.J. Econ. Entomol. 57:609–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leufven, A., Bergstrom, G., andFalsen, E. 1986. Interconversion of verbenols and verbenone by identified yeasts isolated from the spruce bark beetleIps typographus.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1349–1361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, D.M., Jang, E.B., andDickens, J.C. 1988. Electroantennogram responses of the Mediterranean fruit fly,Ceratitis capitata, to a spectrum of plant volatiles.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckibben, G.H., Hardee, D.D., Davich, T.B., Gueldner, R.C., andHedin, P.A. 1971. Slowrelease formulations of grandlure, the synthetic pheromone of the boll weevil.J. Econ. Entomol. 64:317–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, G.H., Johnson, W.L., Edwards, R., Kotter, E., Kearny, J.F., Davich, T.B., Lloyd, E.P., andGanyard, M.C. 1980. A polyester-wrapped cigarette filter for dispensing grandlure.J. Econ. Entomol. 73:250–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, E.B.,Hardee, D.D., andDavich, T.B. 1976. In-field boll weevil trap. U.S. Patent No. 3,949,515.

  • Mori, K., Tamada, S., andHedin, P.A. 1978. (−)-Grandisol, the antipode of the boll weevil pheromone, is biologically active.Naturwissenschaften 65:653–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D., andMeighen, E. 1986. Pheromone biosynthesis and role of functional groups in pheromone specificity.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestwich, G.D. 1987. Chemistry of insect hormone and pheromone metabolism.Science 237:999–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, B., andSchafer, R. 1978. Experimental Neurobiology. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, xii + 367 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostle, B. 1963. Statistics in Research. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. xv + 585 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway, R.L., andLloyd, E.P. 1983. Evolution of cotton insect management in the United States, pp. 3–29,in R.L. Ridgway, E.P. Lloyd, and W.H. Cross (eds.). Cotton Insect Management with Special Reference to the Boll Weevil. USDA Handbook No. 589.

  • Tumlinson, J.H., Hardee, D.D., Gueldner, R.C., Thompson, A.C., Hedin, P.A., andMinyard, J.P. 1969. Sex pheromones produced by male boll weevil: Isolation, identification, and synthesis.Science 166:1010–1012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickens, J.C., Prestwich, G.D. Differential recognition of geometric isomers by the boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boh. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Evidence for only three essential components in aggregation pheromone. J Chem Ecol 15, 529–540 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014698

Key words

Navigation