Skip to main content
Log in

Individual differences in motor skills ability affect the self-regulation of heart rate

  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty males who scored relatively high on the rotor-pursuit motor skills task (High performance group) were given seven 2-minute trials to increase heart rate and seven 2-minute trials to decrease heart rate, as were 20 males who scored relatively low on the rotor-pursuit task (Low performance group). Visual analogue feedback was not provided during the first and last acceleration and deceleration trials but was presented during all other trials. Both groups of subjects were able to decrease heart rate significantly with and without feedback. Subjects in the High performance group were able to increase heart rate significantly with feedback and could generalize this increase to a no-feedback trial following feedback trials. Subjects in the Low performance group could not increase heart rate with or without feedback. Changes in respiration rate paralleled those noted for heart rate, but changes in chin electromyographic activity generally did not parallel the heart rate results. The heart rate data are discussed in terms of motor skills theories of self-regulation of heart rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ax, A. F., Lloyd, R., Gorham, J. C., Lootens, A. M., & Robinson, R. (1978). Autonomic learning: A measure of motivation.Motivation and Emotion, 2 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. (1974a). A general model of voluntary control applied to the phenomena of learned cardiovascular change. In P. A. Obrist, A. H. Black, J. Brener, & L. V. DiCara (Eds.),Cardiovascular psychophysiology: Current issues in response mechanisms, biofeedback, and methodology. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. (1974b). Factors influencing the specificity of voluntary cardiovascular control. In L. V. DiCara (Ed.),Limbic and autonomic nervous system research. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. (1975). Learned control of cardiovascular processes: Feedback mechanisms and therapeutic applications. In K. S. Calhoun, H. E. Adams, & K. M. Mitchel (Eds.),Innovative treatment methods in psychopathology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brener, J. 1977. Sensory and perceptual determinants of voluntary visceral control. In G. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A. (1958). Dimensional analysis of movement reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55 441–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A., & Hempel, W. E. (1956). Factorial analysis of complex psychomotor performance and related skills.Journal of Applied Psychology, 40 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatchel, R. J. (1974). Frequency of feedback and learned heart rate control.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103 274–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. P., & Gatchel, R. J. (1981). The role of biofeedback in the operant modification of human heart rate.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation.6 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. W. (1976). Criterion level and instructional effects in the self control of heart rate.Biological Psychology, 4 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. W., & Lethem, J. (1981). The production of specific decreases in interbeat interval and the motor skills analogy.Psychophysiology, 18 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. (1974). Learned control of human heart rate in a computer controlled environment. In P. A. Obrist, A. H. Black, J. Brener, & L. V. DiCara (Eds.),Cardiovascular psychophysiology: Current issues in response mechanisms, biofeedback, and methodology, Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J. 1975. Acquisition of heart-rate control: Method, theory, and clinical implications. In D. C. Fowles (Ed.),Clinical application of psychophysiology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., & Twentyman, C. T. (1976). Learning to control heart rate: Effects of varying incentive and orientation of success.Psychophysiology, 88 609–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levensen, R. W., & Ditto, W. B. (1981). Individual differences in ability to control heart rate: Personality, strategy, physiological, and other variables.Psychophysiology, 18 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippold, O. C. J. (1967). Electromyography. In P. H. Venables & I. Martin (Eds.),A manual of psychophysiological methods. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1976).Wechsler's measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (5th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCanne, T. R. (1977). Patterns of autonomic and central nervous system responding during human operant heart-rate conditioning.Physiological Psychology, 2 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCanne T. R., & Iennarella, R. S. (1980). Cognitive and somatic events associated with discriminative changes in heart rate.Psychophysiology, 17 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCanne, T. R., & Sandman, C. A. (1976). Human operant heart rate conditioning: The importance of individual differences.Psychological Bulletin, 83 587–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, P. A. (1976). The cardiovascular-behavioral interaction—As it appears today.Psychophysiology, 13 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. E., (1976). Self-regulation of response patterning: Implications for psychophysiological research and therapy.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. E. (1977). Biofeedback and patterning of autonomic and central processes: CNS-cardiovascular interactions. In G. E. Schwartz & J. Beatty (Eds.),Biofeedback: Theory and research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twentyman, C. T., & Lang, P. J. (1980). Instructed heart rate control: Effects of varying feedback frequency and timing.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 5 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D. A. Monguillot, J. E., Hutchinson, P., Jarrell, M. P., & Blouin, D. (1981). Effect of feedback sensitivity upon learned heart rate acceleration.Psychophysiology, 18 712–715.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Some of the results reported in this article are based on a doctoral dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of Northern Illinois University by the second author. The heart rate data were presented at the Convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, 1983.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCanne, T.R., Hathaway, K.M. Individual differences in motor skills ability affect the self-regulation of heart rate. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 9, 241–252 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998838

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998838

Descriptor Key Words

Navigation