Skip to main content
Log in

Biofeedback theory and application in allied health

Speech pathology

  • Ideas And Commentary
  • Published:
Biofeedback and Self-regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of biofeedback procedures represents a new approach to clinical management of speech disorders. Thus far, results of experiments utilizing biofeedback techniques have suggested positive effects in the remediation of speech disorders. The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with the principles of biofeedback; to survey areas of clinical application including voice, fluency, and other clinical disorders; and to explore potential applications of biofeedback procedures for the speech and language pathologist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Booker, H. E., Rubow, R. T., & Coleman, P. J. Simplified feedback in neuromuscular retraining: An automated approach using electromyographic signals.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1969,50 621–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, D. R.The voice and voice therapy Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, D. M., Nelson, B. A., & Brody, J. F. The use of visual feedback in establishing normal vocal intensity in two mildly retarded adults.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1975,40 502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk, K. W. Personal communication, 1976.

  • Cox, D. J., Freundlich, A., & Meyer, R. G. Differential effectiveness of electromyographic feedback, verbal relaxation instructions, and medication placebo.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 892–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, D. A., & Johnson, H. P. Instrumental modification on hypernasal voice quality in retarded children: Case reports.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1974,39 500–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B., & Guitar, B. EMG feedback and recovery of facial and speech gestures following neural anastomosis.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1978, 43 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, A., Dewar, A. D., & Barnes, H. E. Automatic triggering of auditory feedback masking in stammering and cluttering.British Journal of Disorders in Communication 1976,11 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCara, L. V., Barber, T. X., Kamiya, J., Miller, N. E., Shapiro, D., & Stoyva, J. (Eds.).Biofeedback and self-control 1974 Chicago: Aldine, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, G. Systematic research in experimental phonetics: 1. A theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1954,19 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, W. W., Niman, C., Standley, J., & Ender, P. Frontal EMG biofeedback training of athetoid cerebral palsy patients: A report of six cases.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1976,1 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, W. W., Niman, C. A., Standley, J., & Wansley, R. A. Electrophysiologic behavior modification of frontal EMG in cerebral-palsied children.Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1977,2 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, S. G. Contingencies for bioelectronic modification of nasality.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1972, 37, 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaarder, K. R., & Montgomery, P. S.Clinical biofeedback: A procedural mannual Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitar, B. Reduction of stuttering frequency using analog electromyographic feedback.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1975,18 672–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, R., Wilfling, F., & McNeill, B. A biofeedback treatment for stuttering.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1975,40 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. Stuttering I: A critical review and evaluation of biomedical investigations.Journal of Speech Disorders 1944,9 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A.Treatment of vocal-nodules with VIC, a portable voice intensity controller. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, San Francisco, 1972.

  • Holbrook, A., Rolnick, M. I., & Bailey, C. W. Treatment of vocal abuse disorders using a vocal intensity controller.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1974,39 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamiya, J., Barber, T. X., Miller, N. E., Shapiro, D., & Stoyva, J.Biofeedback and self-control 1976/77 Chicago: Aldine, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F. J. Conditioning changes in differential skin temperature.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1975,40 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, R. A., O'Banion, K., Robinson, S., & Staudenmayer, H. Continuous biofeedback and discrete post-trial verbal feedback in frontalis muscle relaxation training.Psychophysiology 1975,12 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanyon, R. I., Barrington, C. C., & Newman, A. C. Modification of stuttering through EMG biofeedback: A preliminary study.Behavior Therapy 1976,7 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legewie, H., Cleary, P., & Rackensperger, W. EMG recording and biofeedback in the diagnosis and therapy of stuttering: A case study.European Journal of Behavioral Analysis and Modification 1975,1 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. Stimulus/response: The promise of biofeedback: Don't hold the party yet.Psychology Today 1975,9 18–22; 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. Clinical applications of biofeedback: Voluntary control of heart rate, rhythm, and blood pressure. In H. I. Russek (Ed.),New horizons in cardiovascular practice Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, K. T., Path, M., Werth, J. L., & Christiansen, R. L. The modification of velar movement.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1973,38 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, M. E.Cleft palate and speech Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysak, E. D.Speech pathology and feedback theory Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netsell, R., & Cleeland, C. S. Modification of lip hypertonia in dysarthria using EMG feedback.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1973,38 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, A., & Broman, H. J. Volume feedback and generalization techniques in shaping speech of an electively mute boy: A case study.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1970,31 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, W. H. Physiological studies. In J. C. Sheehan (Ed.),Stuttering: Research and therapy New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, M. R., Barlow, D. H., & Turner, B. B. Treatment of a severe speech disorder by behavior modification: A case study.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1971,2 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L. J., & Basili, A. Jaw tremor during stuttering block: An electromyographic study.Journal of Communication Disorders 1973,6 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, R. H., & Kohl, M. L. Effects of various forms of relaxation training on physiological and self-report measures of relaxation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, A. Visual aids for speech correction.American Annals of the Deaf 1968,113 178–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, D. L. Modification of nasal resonance in cleft palate children by informative feedback.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1973,6 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, D. A., Martin, J. E., & Fitch, J. L. The effect of visual feedback on a digital exercise in a functionally deaf cerebral palsied child.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1972,3 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, D. A., & Mayhall, B. Behavioral control of spasms using aversive conditioning in a cerebral palsied adult.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1971,152 363–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. A monologue on biofeedback and psychophysiology.Psychophysiology 1977,14 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, R. L., Passani, A., McClelland, K. D., & Bradfield, S. S. Panendoscopic feedback in the study of voluntary velopharyngeal movements.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1975,40 232–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. U., & Henry, J. P. Cybernetic foundations for rehabilitation.American Journal of Physical Medicine 1967,46 379–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. E. The use of real-time visual displays of speech in the training of a profoundly deaf nonspeaking child: A case report.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1971.36 397–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riper, C., & Irwin, J.Voice and articulation Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, D. T., Feather, B. W., & Hedrick, M. W. The effects of immediate feedback upon voluntary control of salivary rate.Psychophysiology 1973,10 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, W. E., Renault, P. F., & Goldiamond, I. Modification of human gastric acid secretion with operant-conditioning procedures.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1975,8 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N.Cybernetics. New York: Wiley, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemain, T. R., & Lee, F. F. Tactile pitch displays for the deaf.IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 1972,20 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, V. I., & Irwin, R. B. Feedback modification in instrumental conditioning of articulation.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1975,30 770.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, S.M., Drichta, C.E. Biofeedback theory and application in allied health. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 5, 159–174 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998593

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998593

Keywords

Navigation