Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pollination mechanisms and pollen-ovule ratios in someGenisteae (Fabaceae) from Southwestern Europe

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the biology and floral rewards of 34 taxa ofGenisteae from the SW of Europe. Most of the floral attributes show a statistically significant direct relationship. Anther biomass of the lower whorl (lW) is significantly lower than that of the upper whorl (uW), and the ratio of the two (Rv) differs among the taxa. All taxa are polliniferous, andRetama sphaerocarpa also secretes nectar. They can be considered xenogamous or facultative xenogams on the basis of their high pollen/ovule (P/O) ratios. Three principal mechanisms of pollen releasing are identified in this tribe: valvular, pump and explosive; the latter comprises specialized and nonspecialized subtypes. Pollination is sternotribic except in the specialized explosive mechanism, in which it is noto-sternotribic. Thus some pollen serves as food (pollen from the uW, which adheres to the ventral surface of the insect) and part of the pollen fulfils a polliniferous function (pollen from the lW, which adheres to the dorsal surface). Species that use a pump mechanism have very low Rv values (Rv=0.08−0.26); species with valvular or nonspecialized explosive mechanisms have Rv values between 0.24 and 0.58; those with a specialized mechanism of pollen presentation have high Rv values (0.6−0.76). In contrast to expectations, the highest P/O ratios appear in the specialized explosive system, which allows a single visit from the insect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amici, J. B., 1830: Note sur le mode d'action du pollen sur le stigmate; extrait d'une lettre deM. Amici àM. Mirbel. — Ann. Sci. Nat.21: 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, M. T. K., 1981: Breeding systems and pollination biology inLeguminosae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,2, pp. 723–769. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisby, F. A., 1981: Tribe 32.Genisteae (Adans.)Benth. (1865). — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 409–425. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresti, M., Blackmore, S., Van Went, J. L., 1992: Atlas of sexual reproduction in flowering plants. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R. W., 1977: Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. — Evolution31: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Correlations among stigma depth, style length, and pollen grain size: do they reflect function or phylogeny? — Bot. Gaz.146: 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size, and the ratio of stigmatic area to the pollen-bearing area of the pollinator: a hypothesis. — Evolution35: 964–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1896: The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. — New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpino, F., 1868–1873: Ulteriore osservazione e considerazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. — Pt. I, 1868, 1869. Pt. II, fasc. 1, 1870; Milano. — Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat.,11, 1868: 265–332;12, 1869: 21–141, 179–233;16, 1873: 151–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. A., 1995: Vegetación y flora de Extremadura. — Badajoz: Universitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G., 1960: The acetolysis method — a revised description. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.54: 561–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K., Van der Pijl, L., 1979: The principles of pollination ecology. — Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, R., Domínguez, E., Muñoz, J. M., 1994: Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size, and breeding system inAstragalus subgenusEpiglottis (Fabaceae): a pollen and seed allocation approach. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1611–1619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gori, D. F., 1989: Floral color change inLupinus argenteus (Fabaceae): why should plants advertise the locations of unrewarding flowers to pollinators? — Evolution43: 870–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, J., 1985: Nectar secretion patterns in Southern Spanish Mediterranean scrublands. — Israel J. Bot.34: 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Flower and fruit biology in Southern Spanish Mediterranean shrublands. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.74: 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M., Hormaza, J. I., 1996: Pistil strategies controlling pollen tube growth. — Sexual Pl. Reprod.9: 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hideux, M., 1972: Techniques d'étude du pollen au MEB: effects comparés des differents traitements physicochimiques. — Micron3: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horovitz, A., Harding, J., 1972: Genetics ofLupinus. V. Intraspecific variability for reproductive traits inLupinus nanus. — Bot. Gaz.133: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, K., 1992: Pollinator limitation in the facultatively autogamous annual,Lupinus nanus (Leguminosae). — Amer. J. Bot.79: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Q. O. N., 1987: Ultraviolet patterning and ultraviolet-absorbing pigments in flowers of theLeguminosae. — InStirton, C. H., (Ed.): Advances in legume systematics,3, pp. 317–354. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, R. B., 1984: Pollen-pistil interactions. — InLinskens, H. F., Heslop-Harrison, J., (Eds): Cellular interactions. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology,17, pp. 508–608. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. T., Olesen, J. M., 1993: Buzz-pollination and patterns in sexual traits in north EuropeanPyrolaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 900–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik, E. E., 1966: Floral evolution and pollination in theLeguminosae. — Ann. Bot. Fenn.3: 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, B. J. D., 1961: The story of pollination. — New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mione, T., Anderson, G. J., 1992: Pollen-ovule ratios and breeding system evolution inSolanum sectionBasarthrum (Solanaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.79: 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H., 1883: The fertilisation of flowers. — London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R., 1969: Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. — Taxon18: 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Olivencia, A., Ramos, S., Rodríguez, T., Devesa, J., 1997: Floral biometry, floral rewards and pollen-ovule ratios in someVicia from Extremadura, Spain. — Edinburgh J. Bot.54: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazy, B., 1984: Insect induced self-pollination. — Pl. Syst. Evol.144: 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou, T., Vokou, D., 1990: Pollination and pollen energetics in Mediterranean ecosystems. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 986–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plitmann, U., Levin, D. A., 1983: Character interrelationships between reproductive organs inPolemoniaceae. — Israel J. Bot.32: 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhill, R. M., 1976:Genisteae (Adans.)Benth. and related tribes (Leguminosae). — Bot. Syst.1: 143–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Evolution and systematics of theLeguminosae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 1–26. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B., 1987: Relationships among flowers, fruits, and seeds. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.18: 409–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M., Yeo, P., Lack, A., 1996: The natural history of pollination. — London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R., 1989: Analyzing tables of statistical tests. — Evolution43: 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, B. A., 1989: The population biology of an annual Texas lupine. — InStirton, C. H., Zarucchi, J. L., (Eds): Advances in legume biology. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.29: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Pollination and banner markings inLupinus texensis (Leguminosae). — SouthW. Naturalist25: 280–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrire, B. D., 1989: A multidisciplinary approach to pollination biology in theLeguminosae. — InStirton, C. H., Zarucchi, J. L., (Eds): Advances in legume biology. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.29: 183–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, E., 1988: Pollen-ovule patterns in tribeTrifolieae (Leguminosae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.160: 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: An expanded circumscription ofMedicago (Leguminosae, Trifolieae) based on explosive flower tripping. — Willdenowia16: 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1979: Biometría. — Madrid: Blume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirton, C. H., 1981: Petal sculpturing in Papilionoid legumes. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,2, pp. 771–788. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statgraphics, 1994: Statgraphics Plus for Windows version 1.0. — RocKville, MD: Statistical Graphics Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Systat, 1992: Systat for Windows: Statistics, version 5 edition. — Evanston, IL: Systat, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonhof, M. J., Harder, L. D., 1995: Size-number trade-offs and pollen production by papilionaceous legumes. — Amer. J. Bot.82: 230–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, C. M., 1978: The floral biology and pollination ecology of two desert lupines. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club105: 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. J., Shand, J. E., 1985: Reproductive biology of tree lucerne (Chamaecytisus palmensis, Leguminosae). — New Zealand J. Bot.23: 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, D., 1984: Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems, and reproductive success in plants. — Oecologia64: 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I. H., 1987: The pollination of lupins. — Bee World68: 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. G., Rouse, J. L., 1990: Relationships of pollen size, pistil length and pollen tube growth rates inRhododendron and their influence on hybridization. — Sexual Pl. Reprod.3: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biología y Producción Vegetal: Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, E-06071, Badajoz, Spain

    Josefa López, Tomás Rodríguez-Riaño, Ana Ortega-Olivencia, Juan Antonio Devesa & Trinidad Ruiz

Authors
  1. Josefa López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomás Rodríguez-Riaño
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana Ortega-Olivencia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Antonio Devesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Trinidad Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, J., Rodríguez-Riaño, T., Ortega-Olivencia, A. et al. Pollination mechanisms and pollen-ovule ratios in someGenisteae (Fabaceae) from Southwestern Europe. Pl Syst Evol 216, 23–47 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985099

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985099

Key words

Search

Navigation