Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Descending aortic blood flow velocity as a noninvasive measure of cardiac output in children

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In previous work, we postulated that mean aortic flow velocity (MAFV) might be a direct measure of cardiac index. To investigate the assumptions inherent in this relation, we measured body surface area, aortic cross-sectional area (two-dimensional ultrasonography) and MAFV (Doppler ultrasonographys) in 70 normal children. For a direct check of the relation, we simultaneously measured cardiac index (Fick technique) and MAFV (Doppler ultrasonography) in 25 children after cardiac surgery. In the normal group, we found that body surface area was directly proportional to aortic cross-sectional area (R 0.94), and MAFV at rest was the same in the ascending and descending aorta (t test,p<0.05). In the intensive care patients, MAFV in the descending aorta was directly proportional to cardiac index over a wide clinical range [MAFV (cm/s)=CI (L/min/m2) · 7.7–1.2]. The assumptions made when deriving the relation between MAFV and cardiac index appear to be valid whether measured in the ascending or descending aorta. However, the scatter of results limits its clinical value. Mean aortic flow velocity is probably of greater use as a trend indicator and has the potential for continuous display using an esophageal Doppler probe when measured in the descending aorta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daily E, Schroeder J (1989) Cardiac output measurements. In: Daily E, Schroeder J (eds)Techniques in Bedside Hemodynamic Monitoring. Mosby, St. Louis, pp. 182–185

    Google Scholar 

  2. Distante A, Moscarelli E, Rovai D, L'Abbate A (1980) Monitoring changes in cardiac output by transcutaneous aortovelography, a non-invasive Doppler technique: comparison with thermodilution.J Nucl Med Allied Sci 24:171–175

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donovan K, Dobb G, Newman M (1987) Comparison of pulsed Doppler and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med 15:853–857

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenberg P jaffe A, Schuster D (1984) Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterisation in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients.Crit Care Med 12:549–552

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eldridge M, Brennan W Jr, Greene E (1985) Serial echo-Doppler measurements of human fetal abdominal aortic blood flow.J Ultrasound Med 4:453–456

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gardin J (1989) Doppler measurements of aortic blood flow velocity and acceleration: load independent indexes of left ventricular performance?Am J Cardiol 14:935–936

    Google Scholar 

  7. George R (1985) The clinical value of measuring cardiac output.Br J Hosp Med 34:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg S, Loeber C (1983) Can Doppler velocities measured anywhere in the aortic arch be substituted for ascending aortic velocities?Circulation 68:260A

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haites N, McLennan F, Mowat D, Rawles J (1985) Assessment of cardiac output by the Doppler ultrasound technique alone.Br Heart J 53:123–126

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haycock G, Schwartz G, Wisotsky D (1978) Body surface area nomogram for children and adults.J Pediatr 93:62–65

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hillel Z, Zane E, Thys D (1988) Systemic arterial blood pressure influences the cross sectional area of descending aorta.Anesthesiology 69:11A

    Google Scholar 

  12. Light H (1976) Transcutaneous aortovelography: a new window on the circulation?Br Heart J 38:433–435

    Google Scholar 

  13. List W, Gravenstein N, Banner T (1987) Interaction in sheep between mean arterial pressure and cross sectional area of the descending aorta: implications for esophageal Doppler monitoring.Anesthesiology 67:178A

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loeppky J, Hoekenga D, Greene E (1984) Comparison of non-invasive pulsed Doppler and Fick measurements of stroke volume in cardiac patients.Am Heart J 107:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mirro R, Busija D, Green R, Leffler C (1987) Relationship between mean airway pressure, cardiac output and organ blood flow with normal and decreased respiratory compliance.J Pediatr 111:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mowat D, Haites N, Rawles J (1983) Aortic blood velocity measurement in healthy adults using a simple ultrasound technique.Cardiovasc Res 17:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson L (1986) Continuous venous oximetry in surgical patients.Ann Surg 203:329–333

    Google Scholar 

  18. Notterman P, Castello F, Steinberg C, et al. (1989) A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children.J Pediatr 115:554–560

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rushmer R, Watson N, Harding D, Baker D (1963) Effects of coronary occlusion on performance of right and left ventricles in intact unanesthetised dogs.Am Heart J 66:522–525

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salmasi A, Salmasi S, Nicolaides A, Dore C, Kidner P (1988) Assessment of the effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular performance by Doppler measurement of the aortic blood velocity during exercise.J Cardiovasc Surg, 29:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seear M, D'Orsogna L, Sandor G (1991) Doppler derived mean aortic flow velocity in children: an alternative to cardiac index.Pediatr Cardiol 12:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snider R, Enderlein M, Teitel D (1984) Two dimensional echocardiographic determination of aortic and pulmonary sizes from infancy to adulthood in normal subjects.Am J Cardiol 53:218–221

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tabata B, Kirsch J, Rogers M (1987) Diagnostic tests and technology for pediatric intensive care. In: Rogers M (ed)Textbook of Pediatric Intensive care. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Touche T, Vervin P, Curien N (1982) Cardiac output measurement in adult patients with combined pulsed Doppler and 2D echocardiography.Circulation 66:121A

    Google Scholar 

  25. Towfiq B, Weir J, Rawles J (1986) Effect of age and blood pressure on aortic size and stroke distance.Br Heart J 55:560–564

    Google Scholar 

  26. Walther F, Siassi B, Ramadan N (1985) Pulsed Doppler determinations of cardiac output in neonates: normal standards for clinical use.Pediatrics 76:829–833

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson N, Goldberg S, Allen M, Marz G, Leober C (1987) Does transducer selection affect aortic arch velocities?Am Heart J 113:878–880

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson N, Goldberg S, Dickinson D, Scott O (1985) Normal intracardiac and great artery blood velocity measurements by pulsed Doppler echocardiography.Br Heart J 53:451–454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seear, M., Webber, S. & Leblanc, J. Descending aortic blood flow velocity as a noninvasive measure of cardiac output in children. Pediatr Cardiol 15, 178–183 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800672

Key Words

Navigation