Summary
In previous work, we postulated that mean aortic flow velocity (MAFV) might be a direct measure of cardiac index. To investigate the assumptions inherent in this relation, we measured body surface area, aortic cross-sectional area (two-dimensional ultrasonography) and MAFV (Doppler ultrasonographys) in 70 normal children. For a direct check of the relation, we simultaneously measured cardiac index (Fick technique) and MAFV (Doppler ultrasonography) in 25 children after cardiac surgery. In the normal group, we found that body surface area was directly proportional to aortic cross-sectional area (R 0.94), and MAFV at rest was the same in the ascending and descending aorta (t test,p<0.05). In the intensive care patients, MAFV in the descending aorta was directly proportional to cardiac index over a wide clinical range [MAFV (cm/s)=CI (L/min/m2) · 7.7–1.2]. The assumptions made when deriving the relation between MAFV and cardiac index appear to be valid whether measured in the ascending or descending aorta. However, the scatter of results limits its clinical value. Mean aortic flow velocity is probably of greater use as a trend indicator and has the potential for continuous display using an esophageal Doppler probe when measured in the descending aorta.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daily E, Schroeder J (1989) Cardiac output measurements. In: Daily E, Schroeder J (eds)Techniques in Bedside Hemodynamic Monitoring. Mosby, St. Louis, pp. 182–185
Distante A, Moscarelli E, Rovai D, L'Abbate A (1980) Monitoring changes in cardiac output by transcutaneous aortovelography, a non-invasive Doppler technique: comparison with thermodilution.J Nucl Med Allied Sci 24:171–175
Donovan K, Dobb G, Newman M (1987) Comparison of pulsed Doppler and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med 15:853–857
Eisenberg P jaffe A, Schuster D (1984) Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterisation in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients.Crit Care Med 12:549–552
Eldridge M, Brennan W Jr, Greene E (1985) Serial echo-Doppler measurements of human fetal abdominal aortic blood flow.J Ultrasound Med 4:453–456
Gardin J (1989) Doppler measurements of aortic blood flow velocity and acceleration: load independent indexes of left ventricular performance?Am J Cardiol 14:935–936
George R (1985) The clinical value of measuring cardiac output.Br J Hosp Med 34:89–93
Goldberg S, Loeber C (1983) Can Doppler velocities measured anywhere in the aortic arch be substituted for ascending aortic velocities?Circulation 68:260A
Haites N, McLennan F, Mowat D, Rawles J (1985) Assessment of cardiac output by the Doppler ultrasound technique alone.Br Heart J 53:123–126
Haycock G, Schwartz G, Wisotsky D (1978) Body surface area nomogram for children and adults.J Pediatr 93:62–65
Hillel Z, Zane E, Thys D (1988) Systemic arterial blood pressure influences the cross sectional area of descending aorta.Anesthesiology 69:11A
Light H (1976) Transcutaneous aortovelography: a new window on the circulation?Br Heart J 38:433–435
List W, Gravenstein N, Banner T (1987) Interaction in sheep between mean arterial pressure and cross sectional area of the descending aorta: implications for esophageal Doppler monitoring.Anesthesiology 67:178A
Loeppky J, Hoekenga D, Greene E (1984) Comparison of non-invasive pulsed Doppler and Fick measurements of stroke volume in cardiac patients.Am Heart J 107:339–343
Mirro R, Busija D, Green R, Leffler C (1987) Relationship between mean airway pressure, cardiac output and organ blood flow with normal and decreased respiratory compliance.J Pediatr 111:101–105
Mowat D, Haites N, Rawles J (1983) Aortic blood velocity measurement in healthy adults using a simple ultrasound technique.Cardiovasc Res 17:75–78
Nelson L (1986) Continuous venous oximetry in surgical patients.Ann Surg 203:329–333
Notterman P, Castello F, Steinberg C, et al. (1989) A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children.J Pediatr 115:554–560
Rushmer R, Watson N, Harding D, Baker D (1963) Effects of coronary occlusion on performance of right and left ventricles in intact unanesthetised dogs.Am Heart J 66:522–525
Salmasi A, Salmasi S, Nicolaides A, Dore C, Kidner P (1988) Assessment of the effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular performance by Doppler measurement of the aortic blood velocity during exercise.J Cardiovasc Surg, 29:89–93
Seear M, D'Orsogna L, Sandor G (1991) Doppler derived mean aortic flow velocity in children: an alternative to cardiac index.Pediatr Cardiol 12:197–200
Snider R, Enderlein M, Teitel D (1984) Two dimensional echocardiographic determination of aortic and pulmonary sizes from infancy to adulthood in normal subjects.Am J Cardiol 53:218–221
Tabata B, Kirsch J, Rogers M (1987) Diagnostic tests and technology for pediatric intensive care. In: Rogers M (ed)Textbook of Pediatric Intensive care. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
Touche T, Vervin P, Curien N (1982) Cardiac output measurement in adult patients with combined pulsed Doppler and 2D echocardiography.Circulation 66:121A
Towfiq B, Weir J, Rawles J (1986) Effect of age and blood pressure on aortic size and stroke distance.Br Heart J 55:560–564
Walther F, Siassi B, Ramadan N (1985) Pulsed Doppler determinations of cardiac output in neonates: normal standards for clinical use.Pediatrics 76:829–833
Wilson N, Goldberg S, Allen M, Marz G, Leober C (1987) Does transducer selection affect aortic arch velocities?Am Heart J 113:878–880
Wilson N, Goldberg S, Dickinson D, Scott O (1985) Normal intracardiac and great artery blood velocity measurements by pulsed Doppler echocardiography.Br Heart J 53:451–454
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seear, M., Webber, S. & Leblanc, J. Descending aortic blood flow velocity as a noninvasive measure of cardiac output in children. Pediatr Cardiol 15, 178–183 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800672
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800672