Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of the CHO/HGPRT+ and the L5178Y/TK+/− mutation assays using suspension treatment and soft agar cloning: Results for 10 chemicals

  • Reviews in Cell Toxicology
  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell assay are sensitive indicators of mutagenicity. The CHO assay has been modified technically to permit treatment in suspension and soft agar cloning comparable to the MLA. This methodology eliminates the risk of metabolic cooperation and the trauma of trypsinization. In addition, a larger population of cells can be treated and cloned for mutant selection. In order to compare the effectiveness of the test systems, 10 chemicals were evaluated for the induction of forward mutations in the CHO and MLA. Several of these chemicals have been reported as clastogenic; therefore, abbreviated colony sizing was performed to gauge the extent of genetic damage to the MLA cells. Both test systems detected benzo[a]pyrene, mitomycin C, acridine orange, and proflavin, and, with the exception of proflavin, more large colonies were present than small colonies. The suspect clastogen, phenytoin, was not mutagenic in the MLA and produced inconclusive results in the CHO. Ethidium bromide, a clastogen and a bacterial mutagen, was not mutagenic in either the MLA or CHO. Four compounds (p-aminophenol, benzoin, methoxychlor, and pyrene) were positive in the MLA, generally inducing a large number of small colonies, while demonstrating no mutagenic activity in the CHO assay. They have also been shown to be generally nongenotoxic in other test systems. Overall, the modified CHO assay did not appear to be better than the MLA for the detection of mutagenic agents. However, the MLA does appear to have lower specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AO:

acridine orange

BAP:

benzo[a]pyrene

BZN:

benzoin

CHO:

Chinese hamster ovary cell assay

DPH:

diphenylhydantoin

EB:

ethidium bromide

EMS:

ethylmethanesulfonate

3MC:

3-methylcholanthrene

MLA:

mouse lymphoma asay

MMC:

mitomycin C

MXC:

methoxychlor

PAP:

p-aminophenol

PRO:

proflavin

PYR:

pyrene

References

  • ADLER, I. (1981). “Comparative mutagenicity of mitomycin C.” In: Comparative Chemical Mutagenesis (F.J. deSerres and M.D. Shelby, eds.). Vol 24. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 993–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMACHER, D.E., and TURNER, G.N. (1982). “Mutagenic evaluation of carcinogens and non-carcinogens in the L5178Y/TK assay utilizing postmitochondrial fractions (S9) from normal rat liver”. Mutation Res. 97: 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMACHER, D.E., and ZELLJADT, I. (1984). “Mutagenic activity of some clastogenic chemicals at the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus of Chinese hamster ovary cells”. Mutation Res. 136: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMACHER, D.E., PAILLET, S.C., TURNER, G.N., RAY, V.A., and SALSBURG, D.S. (1980). “Point mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. II. Test validation and interpretation”. Mutation Res. 72: 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMES, B.N., McCANN, J., and YAMASAKI, E. (1975). “Methods for detecting carcinogens with the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity test”. Mutation Res. 31: 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • APPLEGATE, M.L., MOORE, M.M., BRODER, C.B., BURRELL, A., JUHN, G., KASWECK, K.L., LIN, P.-F., WADHAMS, A., and HOZIER, J.C. (1990). “Molecular dissection of mutations at the heterozygous thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma cells”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 87: 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLAZAK, W.F., LOS, F.J., RUDD, C.J., and CASPARY, W.J. (1989). “Chromosome analysis of small and large L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell colonies: comparison of trifluorothymidine-resistant and unselected cell colonies from mutagen-treated and control cultures”. Mutation Res. 224: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARRANO, A.V., THOMPSON, L.H., LINDL, P.A., and MINKLER, J.L. (1978). “Sister chromatid exchange as an indicator of mutagenesis”. Nature 271: 551–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLINE, J.C., and McMAHON, R.E. (1977). “Detection of chemical mutagens: Use of concentration gradient plate in a high capacity screen”. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 16: 525–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLIVE, D., BATSON, A.G., and TURNER, N.T. (1980). “The ability of L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells to detect single gene and viable chromosome mutations: evaluation and relevance to mutagen and carcinogen screening”. In: The Predictive Value of Short-Term Screening Tests in Carcinogenicity Evaluation (G.M. Williams, R. Kroes, H. W. Waaijers, and K. W. van de Ped, eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLIVE, D., GLOVER, P., APPLEGATE, M., and HOZIER, J. (1990). “Molecular aspects of chemical mutagenesis in L5178Y/TK+/−mouse lymphoma cells”. Mutagenesis 5: 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • COX, R., and MASSON, W.K. (1978). “Do radiation thioguanine-resistant mutants of cultured mammalian cells arise by HGPRT gene mutation or X-chromosome rearrangement?” Nature (London) 276: 629–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANFORD, N., DOUGLAS, G., GULATI, D., ISHIDATE, JR., M., PALLITTI, F., PHILLIPS, B., RICHARDSON, C., and VAN WENT, G. (1985). “Summary report on the performance of cytogenetic assays in cultured mammalian cells”. In: Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens (J. Ashby, F.J. deSerres, M. Draper, M. Ishidate, B.H. Margolin, B.E. Matter, and M.D. Shelby, eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEARFIELD, K.L., HARRINGTON-BROCK, K., DOERR, C.L., PARKER, L., and MOORE, M.M. (1993). “Genotoxicity of three pyridine compounds to L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells”. Mutation Res. 310: 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARINI, D.M., BROCK, K.H., DOERR, C.L., and MOORE, M.M. (1987). “Mutagenicity and clastogenicity of teniposide (VM-26) in L5178Y/TK+/−-3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells”. Mutation Res. 187: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARINI, D.M., BROCK, K.H., DOERR, C.L., and MOORE, M.M. (1988). “Mutagenicity and clastogenicity of proflavin in L5178Y/TK+/−-3.7.2.C cells”. Mutation Res. 204: 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARINI, D.M., BROCKMAN, H.E., DESERRES, F.J., EVANS, H.H., STANKOWSKI, L.F., and HSIE, A.W. (1989). “Specific-locus mutations induced in eukaryotes (especially mammalian cells) by radiation and chemicals: a perspective”. Mutation Res. 220: 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, H.H., MENCL, J., HORNG, N.F., PICANATI, M., SANCHEZ, C., and HOZIER, J. (1986). “Locus specificity in the mutability of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells: The role of multilocus lesions”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 83: 4379–4383.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOSSACK, D.J.N., and RICHARDSON, J.C. (1977). “Examination of the potential mutagenicity of hair dye constituents using the micronucleus test”. Experientia 33: 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOZIER, J., SAWYER, J., CLIVE D., and MOORE, M.M. (1985). “Chromosome II aberrations in small colony L5178Y/TK+/− mutants early in their clonal history”. Mutation Res. 147: 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOZIER, J.C., SAWYER, J.R., and MOORE, M.M. (1989). “High-resolution cytogenetic analysis of L5178Y TK+/− 3.7.2C cells: variation in chromosome 11 breakpoints among small-colony TK−/− mutants”. Mutation Res. 214: 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSIE, A.W., COUCH, D.B., O'NEILL, J.P., SAN SEBASTIAN, J.R., BRIMER, P.A., MACHANOFF, R., RIDDLE, J.C., LI, A.P., IUSCO, J.C., FORBES, N., and HSIE, M.H. (1979). “Utilization of a quantitative mammalian cell mutation system, CHO/HGPRT, in experimental mutagenesis and genetic toxicology”. In: Strategies for Short-Term Testing for Mutagens/Carcinogens (B.E. Butterworth, ed.). CRC press, West Palm Beach. pp. 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • IARC (1982). Monographs 4: 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISHIDATE, M., Jr., HARNOIS, M.C., and SOFUNI, T. (1988). “A comparative analysis of data on the clastogenicity of 951 chemical substances tested in mammalian cell cultures”. Mutation Res. 195: 151–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEONARD, A., DEMEISTER, C., FABRY, L., DESAINT-GEORGES, L., and DUMONT, P. (1984). “Lack of mutagenicity of diphenylhydantoin inin vitro short-term tests”. Mutation Res. 137: 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • LI, A.P., AARON, C.S., AULETTA, A.E., DEARFIELD, K.L., RIDDLE, J.C., SLESINKSI, R.S., and STANKOWSKI, L.F. (1991). “An evaluation of the roles of mammalian cell mutation assays in the testing of chemical genotoxicity”. Reg. Tox. Pharm. 14: 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCANN, J., CHOI, E., YAMOSAKI, E., and AMES, B.N. (1975). “Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in theSalmonella/microsome test. Assay of 300 chemicals”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 72: 5135–5139.

    Google Scholar 

  • MITCHELL, A.D., RUDD, C.J., and CASPARY, W.J. (1988). “Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Intralaboratory results for sixty-three coded chemicals tested at SRU International”. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 12(513): 37–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • MYHR, B.C., and CASPARY, N.J. (1988). “Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Intralaboratory results for sixty-three coded chemicals tested at Litton Bionetics, Inc”. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 12: 103–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Toxicology Program (1985). Annual Plan.

  • OBERLY, T.J., BEWSEY, B.J., and PROBST, G.S. (1984). “An evaluation of the L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma forward mutation assay using 42 chemicals”. Mutation Res. 125: 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • OBERLY, T.J., BEWSEY, B.J., and PROBST, G.S. (1987). “A procedure for the CHO-HGPRT mutation assay involving treatment of cells in suspension culture and selection of mutants in soft-agar”. Mutation Res. 182: 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • OBERLY, T.J., REXROAT, M.A., BEWSEY, B.J., RICHARDSON, K.K., and MICHAELIS, K.C. (1990). “An evaluation of the CHO/HGPRT mutation assay involving suspension cultures and soft agar cloning: Results for 33 chemicals”. Environ. Mutagen. 16: 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARK, D.V. (1960). “The metabolism of [14C]aniline in the rabbit and other animals”. Biochem. J. 77: 493–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROBST, G.S., McMAHON, R.E., HILL, L.E., THOMPSON, C.Z., EPP, J.K., and NEAL, S.B. (1981). “Chemically-induced unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocyte cultures: A comparison with bacterial mutagenicity using 218 compounds”. Environ. Mutagen. 3: 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROGERS, A.M., and BACK, K.C. (1982). “Comparative mutagenicity of 4 DNA-intercalating agents in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells”. Mutation Res. 102: 447–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEZZANO, P., RAIMONDI, A., ARBOIX, M., and PANTAROTTO, C. (1982). “Mutagenicity of diphenylhydantoin and some of its metabolites towardsSalmonella typhimurium strains”. Mutation Res. 103: 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • SODERMAN, J.V. (1982). Handbook of Identified Carcinogens and Noncarcinogens. CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp. 1–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • TINDALL, K.R., and STANKOWSKI, J., L.F (1987). “Deletion mutations are associated with the differential-induced mutant frequency response of the AS52 and CHO-K1-BH4 cells”. In: Banbury Report 28: Mammalian Cell Mutagenesis (M.M. Moore, D.M. DeMarini, F.J. deSerres and K.R. Tindall, eds.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. pp. 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILD, D., ECKHARDT, K., GROCKE, E., and KING, M.T. (1980). “Comparative results of short-term in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity tests obtained with selected environmental chemicals”. In: Short-Term Test Systems for Detecting Mutagenicity (K.H. Norpoth and R.C. Garner, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Toxicology Research Laboratories Lilly Research Laboratories, A Division of Eli Lilly and Company, 46140, Greenfield, IN, USA

    T. J. Oberly, K. C. Michaelis, M. A. Rexroat, B. J. Bewsey & M. L. Garriott

Authors
  1. T. J. Oberly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. C. Michaelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. A. Rexroat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. J. Bewsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. L. Garriott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberly, T.J., Michaelis, K.C., Rexroat, M.A. et al. A comparison of the CHO/HGPRT+ and the L5178Y/TK+/− mutation assays using suspension treatment and soft agar cloning: Results for 10 chemicals. Cell Biol Toxicol 9, 243–257 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755603

Keywords

Search

Navigation