Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heterogeneity and progression of renal cell carcinomas as revealed by DNA cytofluorometry and the significance of the presence of polyploid cells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With special attention to the presence of polyploid cells, we examined heterogeneity and progression of renal cell carcinomas. We separated 116 blocks from 51 tumors into several specimens according to the histologic findings, and analyzed their DNA ploidy patterns. Thirty-one tumors (61%) were aneuploid, 29 of which showed intratumoral DNA ploidy heterogeneity. Diploid cell lines were observed in 47 tumors (92%). Polyploid cells in the diploid component were more frequently found in tumors with mixed diploid and aneuploid patterns than in the purely diploid tumors. Of the diploid cases, higher stage cases tended to have a higher incidence of polyploid cells than the lower stage cases. The incidence of aneuploid cases and DNA heterogeneity became greater as the tumors progressed. Aneuploid cases had a poorer outcome than did the diploid cases. If diploid cases with polyploid cells were classified as aneuploid cases, the difference in the survival rate between the diploid and aneuploid cases became more significant. Diploid renal cell carcinomas with polyploid cells may be an intermediate stage between diploidy and aneuploidy. Analyzing renal cell carcinomas for the presence of polyploid cells is useful for differentiating diploidy, which is actually aneuploid, from pure diploidy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Abadi H, Nagel R (1988) Prognostic relevance of ploidy and proliferative activity of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 15:271

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banner BF, Brancazio L, Bahnson RR, Ernstoff MS, Taylor SR (1990) DNA analysis of multiple synchronous renal cell carcinomas. Cancer 66:2180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Currin SM, Lee SE, Walther PJ (1990) Flow cytometric assessment of deoxyribonucleic acid content in renal adenocarcinoma: does ploidy status enhance prognostic stratification over stage alone? J Urol 143:458

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekfors TO, Lipasti J, Nurmi MJ, Eerola E (1987) Flow cytometric analysis of the DNA profile of renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 182:58

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grignon DJ, Ayala AG, El-Naggar A, Wishnow KI, Ro JY, Swanson DA, McLemore D, Giacco GG, Guinee VF (1989) Renal cell carcinoma. A clinicopathologic and DNA flow cytometric analysis of 103 cases. Cancer 64:2133

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grignon DJ, El-Naggar A, Green LK, Ayala AG, Ro JY, Swanson DA, Troncoso P, McLemore D, Giacco GG, Guinee VF (1989) DNA flow cytometry as a predictor of outcome of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 63:1161

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamada S, Itoh R, Fujita S (1988) DNA distribution pattern of the so-called severe dysplasia and small carcinomas of the colon and rectum and its possible significance in the tumor progression. Cancer 61:1555

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamada S, Namura K, Fujita S, Kushima R, Hattori T (1990) DNA ploidy and proliferative activity of human pulmonary epithelium. Virchows Arch [B] Cell Pathol 58:405

    Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese Urological Association, The Japanese Society of Pathology, Japan Radiological Society (1992) General rule for clinical and pathological studies on renal cell carcinoma, 2nd edn. Tokyo, Kanehara, p 82

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kloppel G, Knofel WT, Baish H, Otto U (1986) Prognosis of renal cell carcinoma related to nuclear grade, DNA content and Robson stage. Eur Urol 12:426

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kushima M, Konishi T, Okada Y, Tomoyoshi T, Kushima R, Hattori T (1994) Tumor heterogeneity in DNA ploidy of renal cell carcinomas as revealed by static cytofluorometry and flow cytometry. Jpn J Urol 85:473

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lanigan DJ, McLean PA, Murphy DM, Donovan MG, Leader M (1992) Image analysis in the determination of ploidy and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 22:228

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ljungberg B, Stenling R, Roos G (1985) DNA content in renal cell carcinoma with reference to tumor heterogeneity. Cancer 56:503

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ljungberg B, Forsslund G, Stenling R, Zetterberg A (1986) Prognostic significance of the DNA content in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 135:422

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ljungberg B, Stenling R, Ross G (1987) Flow cytometric DNA analysis of renal-cell carcinoma. A study of fine needle aspiration biopsies in comparison with multiple surgical samples. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 9:505

    Google Scholar 

  16. UICC International Union Against Cancer (1979) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 4th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 136

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida S (1992) DNA value and prognosis of renal tumors differences between childhood and adult tumors. Acta Pathol Jpn 42:185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kushima, M., Kushima, R., Hattori, T. et al. Heterogeneity and progression of renal cell carcinomas as revealed by DNA cytofluorometry and the significance of the presence of polyploid cells. Urol. Res. 23, 381–386 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698739

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698739

Key words

Navigation