Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

O 6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and induction of novel immunogenicity in murine tumor cells treated with methylating agents

  • Original Articles
  • Xenogenization, O6-Methylguanine, Immunogenicity, Murine Tumor Cells
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To investigate the mechanism of the generation of immunogenic tumor variants by mutagenic drugs, murine leukemia cells exhibiting different sensitivity to killing by the alkylator 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and different ability to repairO 6-methylguanine in their DNA were treated in vitro with a series of methylating agents, including triazene derivatives, temozolomide, and streptozotocin. At the population level, we found that BCNU-resistant cells (L1210/BCNU) that appeared to be cross-resistant to killing by a dimethyltriazene and expressed high levels ofO 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity (mer+ phenotype) failed to generate highly immunogenic variant sublines on repeated exposure to the methylating agents. In contrast, all cells (L1210) that were susceptible to DNA alkylation damage and deficient inO 6-methylguanine repair (mer) developed immunogenic variant sublines. A noticeable exception was represented by streptozotocin treatment, which was equally effective in mer+ and mer cells. At the clonal level, a single exposure to streptozotocin or a triazene derivative resulted in a high incidence (33% and 50%, respectively) of immunogenic cell generation in mer cells only. In mer+ cells, streptozotocin treatment led to a 33% incidence of immunogenic clones only when the cells were concurrently exposed toO 6-methylguanine as a free base. The activity ofO 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in mer+ cells was greatly reduced by treatment withO 6-methylguanine or streptozotocin, and the combination of the two drugs led to enzyme levels similar to those observed in mer cells. Taken together, these data suggest that the mechanism ofO 6-alkylation may be operative in the induction of novel tumor-cell antigenicity by methylating agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BCNU:

1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea

MT:

methyltransferase

O6-mG:

O 6-methylguanine

TZM:

temozolomide; DM-CI, I-(p-chlorophenyl)-3,3-dimethyl-triazene

DTIC:

5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide

STZ:

streptozotocin

MST:

median survival time

References

  1. Altevogt P, Apt D (1988) High-frequency generation of altered Mr 70000env glycoproteins inN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine treated murine tumor cells. Cancer Res 48: 1137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balsinger R, Montgomery J (1960) Synthesis of potential anticancer agents: XXV. Preparation of 6-alkoxy-2-aminopurines. J Org Chem 25: 1573

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonmassar E, Bonmassar A, Vadlamudi S, Goldin A (1970) Immunological alteration of leukemic cells in vivo after treatment with an antitumor drug. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 66: 1089

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boon T, Kellermann O (1977) Rejection by syngeneic mice of cell variants obtained by mutagenesis of a malignant teratocarcinoma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 272

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boon T, Van Pel A, De Plaen E (1989) Tum transplantation antigens, point mutations, and antigenic peptides: a model for tumorspecific transplantation antigens? Cancer Cells 1: 25

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catapano CV, Broggini M, Erba E, Ponti M, Mariani L, Citti L, D'Incalci M (1987) In vitro and in vivo methazolastone-induced DNA damage and repair in L-1210 leukemia sensitive and resistant to chloroethylnitrosoureas. Cancer Res 47: 4884

    Google Scholar 

  7. Day RS III, Ziolkowski CHJ, Scudiero DA, Meyer SA, Lubiniecki AS, Girardi AJ, Galloway SM, Bynum GD (1980) Delective repair of alkylated DNA by human tumour and SV40-transformed human cell strains. Nature 288: 724

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Plaen E, Lurquin C, Van Pel A, Mariamé B, Szikora JP, Wolfel T, Sibille C, Chomez P, Boon T (1988) Tum variants of mouse mastocytoma P815. Cloning of the gene of tum antigen P91A and identification of the tum mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 2274

    Google Scholar 

  9. Domoradzki J, Pegg AE, Dolan ME, Maher VN, McCormick JJ (1984) Correlation betweenO 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and resistance of human cells to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effect ofN-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. Carcinogenesis (Lond) 5: 1641

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eadie JS, Conrad M, Toorchen D, Topal MD (1984) Mechanism of mutagenesis byO 6-methylguanine. Nature 308: 201

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foote RS, Mitra S, Pal BC (1980) Demethylation ofO 6-methylguanine in a synthetic DNA polymer by an induced activity inEscherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 97: 654

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fuschiotti P, Fioretti MC, Romani L, Puccetti P (1989) Lack of correlation between DNA-methylating activity and appearance of the immunogenic phenotype in clones of a murine lymphoma treated with mutagens. Cancer Immunol Immunother 29: 139

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerulath AH, Loo TL (1972) Mechanism of action of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-I-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide in mammalian cells in culture. Biochem Pharmacol 21: 2335

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gescher A, Threadgill MD (1987) The metabolism of triazene antitumor drugs. Pharmacol Ther 32: 191

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giampietri A, Fioretti MC, Goldin A, Bonmassar E (1980) Drug-mediated antigenic changes in murine leukemia cells: antagonistic effects of quinacrine, an antimutagenic compound. J Natl Cancer Inst 64: 297

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson NW, Hartley JA, Barnes D, Erickson LC (1986) Combined effects of streptozotocin and mitozolomide against four human cell lines of the mer+ phenotype. Cancer Res 46: 4995

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grohmann U, Ullrich SJ, Mage MG, Appella E, Fioretti MC, Puccetti P, Romani L (1990) Identification and immunogenic properties of an 80-kDa surface antigen on a drug-treated tumor variant: relationship to MuLV gp70. Eur J Immunol 20: 629

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ishida R, Takahashi T (1987)N-Methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitro-soguanidine-resistant HeLa S3 cells still have littleO 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and are hypermutable by alkylating agents. Carcinogenesis (Lond) 8: 1109

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindahl T, Demple B, Robins P (1982) Surcide inactivation of theE. coli O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. EMBO J 1: 1359

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malaveille C, Brun G, Kolar G, Bartsch H (1982) Mutagenic and alkylating activities of 3-methyl-4-phenyltriazenes and their possible role as carcinogenic metabolites of the parent dimethyl compounds. Cancer Res 42: 1446

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mizuno NS, Decker RV, Zakis B (1975) Effects of 5-(3-methyl-1-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide (NSC-407347), an alkylating agent derived from 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (NSC-45 388). Biochem Pharmacol 24: 615

    Google Scholar 

  22. Myrnes B, Norstrand K, Giercksky KE, Sjunneskog C, Krokan H (1984) A simplified assay forO 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and its application to human neoplastic and nonneoplastic tissues. Carcinogenesis (Lond) 5: 1061

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nardelli B, Contessa AR, Romani L, Sava G, Nisi C, Fioretti MC (1984) Immunogenic changes of murine lymphoma cells following in vivo treatment with aryl-triazene derivatives. Cancer Immunol Immunother 16: 157

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pegg AE (1984) Repair ofO 6-methylguanine in DNA by mammalian tissues. In: Greim H, Jung R, Kramer M, Marquardt H, Oesch F (eds) Biochemical basis of chemical carcinogenesis. Raven Press, New York, p 265

    Google Scholar 

  25. Puccetti P, Romani L, Fioretti MC (1987) Chemical xenogenization of experimental tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev 6: 93

    Google Scholar 

  26. Skibba JL, Bryan GT (1971) Methylation of nucleic acids and urinary excretion of14C-labeled 7-methylguanine by rats and man after administration of 4(5)-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)-imidazole-5(4)-carboxamide. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 18: 707

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sklar R, Strauss S (1981) Removal ofO 6-methylguanine from DNA of normal andXeroderma pigmentosum-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines. Nature 289: 417

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yarosh DB, Hurst-Calderone S, Babich MA, Day RS III (1986) Inactivation ofO 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and sensitization of human tumor cells to killing by chloroethylnitrosourea byO 6-methylguanine as a free base. Cancer Res 46: 1663

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zlotogorski C, Erickson LC (1983) Pretreatment of normal human fibroblasts and human colon carcinoma cells with MNNG allows chloroethylnitrosourea to produce DNA interstrand crosslinks not observed in cells treated with chloroethylnitrosourea alone. Carcinogenesis (Lond) 4: 759

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by Progetto Finalizzato “Applicazioni cliniche della ricerca oncologica”, CNR-Rome, Italy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bianchi, R., Citti, L., Beghetti, R. et al. O 6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity and induction of novel immunogenicity in murine tumor cells treated with methylating agents. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 29, 277–282 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685945

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685945

Keywords

Navigation