Skip to main content
Log in

Neuroethology of sound production in gomphocerine grasshoppers (orthoptera: acrididae)

II. Neuromuscular activity underlying stridulation

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Sound production of grasshoppers is based upon central motor patterns which are hierarchically organized at various functional levels (Fig. 2). These involve coordination (i) of single motor units belonging to the same muscles, (ii) of muscles relating to one hindleg, and (iii) of laterally homologous muscles moving the left and the right hindleg, respectively.

  2. 2.

    The motor organization at the first two levels has been investigated comparatively in several species. The neuromuscular activity underlying stridulation was recorded in freely moving animals using flexible wire electrodes (diameter 20–30 μm) which allowed the functional identification of individual motor units (Fig. 3). Up to 30 electrodes were chronically implanted into the metathoracic muscles without restricting the behaviour.

  3. 3.

    The motor patterns are based upon certain principles some of which are generally valid for all species: (i) The individual units are characterized by discrete types of activity (Fig. 4). (ii) Motor units and muscles are always recruited in a fixed order (Figs. 1, 3, 10).

  4. 4.

    The co-ordination of single units does not follow a general scheme but it reflects features of the specific song patterns (Fig. 5). The muscles producing the movements of one hindleg are also specifically co-ordinated: (i) In rapidly stridulating species the sets of antagonistic muscles are coupled in an unequivocal (unimodal) manner from which the pattern of leg movements can easily be deduced (Figs. 11, 12, 13). (ii) On the other hand, in slowly stridulating species the antagonistic muscles are coupled in two ways, since several of them are recruited both before the beginning and at the end of the leg strokes (Figs. 7–9). Maximum of motor activity is usually found at the end of the upward movements where the activities of both the elevator and depressor muscles partly overlap (Fig. 7b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley, D.R.: Intracellular activity in cricket neurons during the generation of behaviour patterns. J. Insect Physiol.15, 677–699 (1969a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, D. R.: Intracellular activity in cricket neurons during the generation of song patterns. Z. vergl. Physiol.62, 267–283 (1969b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, D. R.: A topological map of the locust flight system motor neurons. J. Insect Physiol.16, 905–918 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, D. R., Kutsch, W.: The neuromuscular mechanism of stridulation in crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. exp. Biol.45, 154–164 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, M., Hoyle, G.: Neural mechanisms underlying behaviour in the locustSchistocerca gregaria. III. Topography of limb motoneurons in the metathoracic ganglion. J. Neurobiol.4, 167–186 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. J.: Functional significance of motoneuron size and soma position in swimmeret system of the lobster. J. Neurophysiol.34, 274–288 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, N.: Muskelaktivität und Lauterzeugung bei einer Feldheuschrecke. Zool. Anz.31, Suppl., 592–601 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, N.: Die neuromuskularen Grundlagen des Werbeverhaltens der Roten KeulenheuschreckeGomphocerippus rufus. L. Z. vergl. Physiol.60, 308–350 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, N.: The central nervous control of courtship behaviour in the grasshopperGomphocerippus rufus (L.). In: Neurobiology of invertebrates, p. 261–287. Tihany: Hung. Acad. Sciences 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, N.: Neuroethology of sound production in gomphocerine grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). I. Song patterns and stridulatory movements. J. comp. Physiol. 88, 67–102 (1974a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, N.: Neural economy: Bifunctional muscles and common central pattern elements in leg and wing stridulation of the grasshopperStenobothrus rubicundus Germ. (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. comp. Physiol.89, 227–236 (1974b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Godden, D. H.: The neural basis of locust jumping. Amer. Zool.9, 1139–1140 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitler, W. J.: The locust jump. Specializations of the metathoracic femoral-tibial joint. J. comp. Physiol.89, 93–104 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennemann, E., Somjen, G., Carpenter, D. O.: Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol.28, 560–580 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, M., Camhi, J. M.: Locust motoneurons: Bursting activity correlated with axon diameter. Science175, 553–556 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G.: Neuromuscular mechanisms of a locust skeletal muscle. Proc. roy. Soc. B143, 343–367 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G.: Nervous control of insect muscles. In: Recent advances in invertebrate physiology (ed. B. T. Scheer), p. 73–98. Eugene, Oregon: Univ. Oregon Publ. 1957

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G.: Exploration of neuronal mechanisms underlying behaviour in insects. In: Neural theory and modeling (ed. R. F. Reiss), p. 346–376. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G.: Cellular mechanisms underlying behaviour-neuroethology. Advanc. Insect Physiol.7, 349–444 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G., Burrows, M.: Neural mechanisms underlying behaviour in the locustSchistocerca gregaria. I. Physiology of identified motoneurons in the metathoracic ganglion. J. Neurobiol.4, 3–41 (1973a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, G., Burrows, M.: Neural mechanisms underlying behaviour in the locustSchistocerca gregaria. II. Integrative activity in metathoracic neurons. J. Neurobiol.4, 43–67 (1973b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F.: Untersuchungen über die Funktion des Zentralnervensystems und insbesondere des Gehirns bei der Fortbewegung und der Lauterzeugung der Grillen. Z. vergl. Physiol.44, 60–132 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F.: Aktuelle Probleme in der Physiologie des Nervensystems der Insekten. Naturw. Rundschau18, 143–156 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, R. K., Halverson, R. L.: High frequency muscles used in sound production by a katydid. I. Organization of the motor system. Biol. Bull.141, 413–33 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutsch, W.: Neuromuskuläre Aktivität bei verschiedenen Verhaltensweisen von drei Grillenarten. Z. vergl. Physiol.63, 335–378 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. L.: The regulation of breathing in insects. In: Recent advances in insect physiology. London: Academic Press 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith, H.: Der Heuschreckensprung und seine neuromotorischen Grundlagen. Staatsarbeit, Köln 1973

  • Snodgrass, R. E.: The thoracic mechanism of a grasshopper and its antecedents. Smith. misc. Coll.82, 1–111 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P.: Self-differentiation of the basic patterns of co-ordination. Comp. Psych. Monogr.17, 1–96 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. M.: Bifunctional muscles in the thorax of grasshoppers. J. exp. Biol.39, 669–677 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.M.: The nervous control of insect flight and related behaviour. In: Recent advances in insect physiology. London: Academic Press 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. M., Weis-Fogh, T.: Patterned activity of co-ordinated motor units, studied in flying locusts. J. exp. Biol.39, 643–667 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, R. S.: Theoretical implications of the size principle of motoneuron recruitment. J. theor. Biol.38, 587–596 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft has generously supported the investigations (EI 35/4-7).

I gratefully acknowledge the inspiring encouragement given by Prof. F. Huber. I am also most indebted to Prof. D. R. Bentley, to Dr. L. H. Field, and to Prof. P. L. Miller for their helpful and stimulating criticism of the manuscript. Finally, I have to thank Prof. G. Hoyle for intense and fruitful discussions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elsner, N. Neuroethology of sound production in gomphocerine grasshoppers (orthoptera: acrididae). J. Comp. Physiol. 97, 291–322 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631967

Keywords

Navigation