Skip to main content
Log in

The eyes of hyperiid amphipods: relations of optical structure to depth

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In many oceanic hyperiid amphipods the eyes are double structures, with a specialized upward-pointing region covering a narrow field of view. Inter-ommatidial angles were measured across the eyes of 10 species from different depth ranges. With increasing depth (decreasing light) there is a trend towards greater dorso-ventral asymmetry resulting in the separation of the two retinae and an increase in the size of the upper eye. The diameters (D) of the dorsal ommatidia increase with depth, and the inter-ommatidial angles (Δφ) decrease. There are no corresponding changes in the lower eyes. These features can be explained on the assumption that the upper eyes are used to detect small opaque targets against the downwelling light from the surface. In contrast to the resolution of grating-like targets, where the productD Δ φ should increase as light intensity decreases (the ‘eye-parameter’; Snyder 1979), the detection of single targets requires that the ratioD/Δ φ should increase in dim light. Amongst hyperiids this ratio does indeed show a 50-fold increase from surface-to deep-living species, whereas the eye-parameter hardly changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball EE (1977) Fine structure of the compound eyes of the midwater amphipodPhronima in relation to behaviour and habitat. Tissue Cell 9:521–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman TE, Gruner H-E (1973) The families and genera of Hyperiidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Smithsonian Contrib Zool 146:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun C (1896) Atlantis. Biologische Studien über pelagische Organismen. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 7:1–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, W (1909) Die Facettenaugen der Dipteren. Z Wiss Zool 92:465–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison GR, Biggs DC, Madin LP (1977) The associations of Amphipoda Hyperiidea with gelatinous Zooplankton. II. Associations with Cnidaria, Ctenophora and Radiolaria. Deep Sea Res 24:465–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge GA (1978) The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 285:1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerlov NJ (1968) Optical oceanography. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K (1974) The absolute sensitivity of lens and compound eyes. Z Naturforsch 29 c:592–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K (1979) The visual system of the fly: physiological optics and functional anatomy as related to behaviour. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences 4th study program. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass, pp 297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1980) Eye movements and the mechanism of vertical steering in euphausiid Crustacea. J Comp Physiol 137:255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1981 a) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6 B). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1981 b) Optics of the eyes ofPhronima and other deep-sea amphipods. J Comp Physiol 145:209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1984) Crustacea. In: Ali MA (ed) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum, New York, pp 401–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1989) Variations in the structure and design of compound eyes. In: Hardie RC, Stavenga DG (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 90–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF, Burton FA, Meyer-Rochow VB (1979) The optical geometry of euphausiid eyes. J Comp Physiol 130:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Madin LP, Harbison GR (1977) The association of Amphipoda Hyperiidea with gelationous Zooplankton. I. Associations with Salpidae. Deep Sea Res 24:449–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Rochow VB (1978) The eyes of mesopelagic crustaceans. II.Streetsia challengeri (Amphipoda). Cell Tissue Res 186:337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson D-E (1982) The transparent compound eye ofHyperia (Crustacea): examination with a new method for analysis of refractive index gradients. J Comp Physiol 147:339–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider L, Gogala M, Draslar K, Langer H, Schlecht P (1978) Feinstruktur und Schirmpigment-Eigenschaften der Ommatidien des Doppelauges vonAscalaphus (Insecta, Neuroptera). Cytobiologie 16:274–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherk TE (1978) Development of the compound eyes of dragonflies (Odonata). III. Adult compound eyes. J Exp Zool 203:61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder A (1979) Physics of vision in compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6 A). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenga DG (1979) Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6 A). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston MH (1976) The vertical distribution and diurnal migration of the Crustacea Amphipoda collected during the SOND cruise 1965. J Mar Biol Ass UK 56:383–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J (1983) Sexual dimorphism in the visual system of flies: the compound eyes and neural superposition in Bibionidae (Diptera). J Comp Physiol 150:379–393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Land, M.F. The eyes of hyperiid amphipods: relations of optical structure to depth. J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 751–762 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00616747

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00616747

Keywords

Navigation