Skip to main content
Log in

A new paradigm for hypothesis testing in medicine, with examination of the Neyman Pearson condition

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past, hypothesis testing in medicine has employed the paradigm of the repeatable experiment. In statistical hypothesis testing, an unbiased sample is drawn from a larger source population, and a calculated statistic is compared to a preassigned critical region, on the assumption that the comparison could be repeated an indefinite number of times. However, repeated experiments often cannot be performed on human beings, due to ethical or economic constraints. We describe a new paradigm for hypothesis testing which uses only rearrangements of data present within the observed data set. The token swap test, based on this new paradigm, is applied to three data sets from cardiovascular pathology, and computational experiments suggest that the token swap test satisfies the Neyman Pearson condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angell, M.: 1984, ‘Patients' preferences in randomized clinical trials’, New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1385–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arcidi, J. M., Jr., Moore, G. W., and Hutchins, G. M.: 1981, ‘Hepatic morphology in cardiac dysfunction: A clinicopathologic study of 1000 autopsied patients’, American Journal of Pathology 104, 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett, G. O.: 1984, ‘The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice’, New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1643–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berkson, J.: 1946, ‘Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data’, Biometrics Bulletin 2, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  5. de la Monte, S. M., Hutchins, G. M., and Moore, G. W.: 1985, ‘Peripheral neuroblastic tumors and congenital heart disease: Role of hypoxic states in tumor induction’, American Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 17, 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de la Monte, S. M., Hutchins, G. M., and Moore, G. W.: 1984, ‘Compensatory neoplasia: Chronic erythrocytosis and neuroblastic tumors’, Theoretical Medicine 5, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diaconis, P. and Efron, B.: 1983. ‘Computer-intensive methods in statistics. They replace standard assumptions about data with massive calculations. One method, the “bootstrap,” has revised many previous estimates of the reliability of scientific inferences’, Scientific American 248, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Efron, B.: 1979, ‘Computers and the theory of statistics: Thinking the unthinkable.’ Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review 21, 460–480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellenberg, S. S.: 1984, ‘Randomization designs in comparative clinical trials’, New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1404–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feinstein, A. R. and Horwitz, R. I.: 1982, ‘Double standards, scientific methods, and epidemiologic research’, New England Journal of Medicine 307, 1611–1617.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, R. A.: 1958, ‘Tests of goodness of fit, independence and homogeneity; with table of x 2’, Chapter 10. In, Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 13th ed. Hafner Publishing Company, Inc., New York, pp. 78–113.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haupt, H. M., Hutchins, G. M., and Moore, G. W.: 1981, ‘Ara-C Lung: Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema complicating cytosine arabinoside therapy of leukemia’, American Journal of Medicine 70, 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoel, P. G.: 1971, Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 97–112, 190–220.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kircher, T., Carter, J. R., and Sinton, E.: 1985, ‘The National Autopsy Data Bank’, Pathologist 39, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kircher, T., Nelson, J. and Burdo, H.: 1985, ‘The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate’, New England Journal of Medicine 313, 1263–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W.: 1959, ‘Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease’, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22, 719–748.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mood, A. M. and Graybill, F. A.: 1963, ‘Sampling distributions’, Chapter 10. In, Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, pp. 220–247.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, G. W., Haupt, H. M., and Hutchins, G. M.: 1982, ‘A hypothesis test for causal explanations in human pathology: Evaluation of pulmonary edema in 181 autopsied patients with leukemia’, Mathematical Bioscience 62, 253–279.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moore, G. M., Hutchins, G. M., and Miller, R. E.: 1984, ‘Strategies for searching medical natural language text: Distribution of words in the anatomical diagnoses of 7000 autopsied patients’, American Journal of Pathology 115, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, G. W., Hutchins, G. M., and Miller, R. E.: 1986, ‘Token swap test of significance for serial medical databases’, American Journal of Medicine 80, 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, W. C.: 1978, ‘The Autopsy. Its decline and a suggestion for its revival’, New England Journal of Medicine 299, 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro, A. R.: 1982, ‘Exploratory analysis of the medical record’, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 781–786.

  23. Simborg, D. W., Chadwick, M., and Whiting-O'Keefe, Q. E.: 1983, ‘Local area networks and the hospital’, Computers in Biomedical Research 16, 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor, K. M., Margolese, R. G., and Soskolne, C. L.: 1984, ‘Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer’, New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1363–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  25. White, C.: 1953, ‘Sampling in medical research’, British Medical Journal 2, 1284–1288.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

From the Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. G. William Moore, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Supported by NIH Grant LM-03651 from the National Library of Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, G.W., Hutchins, G.M. & Miller, R.E. A new paradigm for hypothesis testing in medicine, with examination of the Neyman Pearson condition. Theor Med Bioeth 7, 269–282 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00539848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00539848

Key Words

Navigation