Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy of protoporphyrin as a predictive biomarker for lead exposure in canvasback ducks: Effect of sample storage time

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used 363 blood samples collected from wild canvasback dueks (Aythya valisineria) at Catahoula Lake, Louisiana, U.S.A. to evaluate the effect of sample storage time on the efficacy of erythrocytic protoporphyrin as an indicator of lead exposure. The protoporphyrin concentration of each sample was determined by hematofluorometry within 5 min of blood collection and after refrigeration at 4 °C for 24 and 48 h. All samples were analyzed for lead by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Based on a blood lead concentration of ≥0.2 ppm wet weight as positive evidence for lead exposure, the protoporphyrin technique resulted in overall error rates of 29%, 20%, and 19% and false negative error rates of 47%, 29% and 25% when hematofluorometric determinations were made on blood at 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h, respectively. False positive error rates were less than 10% for all three measurement times. The accuracy of the 24-h erythrocytic protoporphyrin classification of blood samples as positive or negative for lead exposure was significantly greater than the 5-min classification, but no improvement in accuracy was gained when samples were tested at 48 h. The false negative errors were probably due, at least in part, to the lag time between lead exposure and the increase of blood protoporphyrin concentrations. False negatives resulted in an underestimation of the true number of canvasbacks exposed to lead, indicating that hematofluorometry provides a conservative estimate of lead exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • AndersonW. L.: 1992, ‘Legislation and Lawsuits in the United States and their Effects on Nontoxic Shot Regulations’, in PainD. J. (ed.), Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl. IWRB Special Publication No. 16. The Internationall Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, Slimbridge, Gloucester, United Kingdom, pp. 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • BellroseF. C.: 1959, ‘Lead Poisoning as a Mortality Factor in Waterfowl Populations’, Ill. Nat. Hist. Bull. 27, 235–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • BeyerW. N., PatteeO. H., SileoL., HoffmanD. J. and MulhernB. M.: 1985, ‘Metal Contamination in Wildlife Living Near Two Zinc Smelters’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser A) 38, 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • BeyerW. N., SpannJ. W., SileoL. and FransonJ. C.: 1988, ‘Lead Poisoning in Six Captive Avian Species’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 17, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • BirkheadM.: 1982, ‘Causes of Mortality in the Mute Swan Cygnus olor on the River Thames’, J. Zool. Soc. Lond. 198, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • BlusL. J., HennyC. J., HoffmanD. J. and GroveR. A.: 1991, ‘Lead Toxicosis in Tundra Swans Near a Mining and Smelting Complex in Northern Idaho’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 21, 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • BullK. R., EveryW. J., FreestoneP., HallJ. R., OrbornD., CookeA. S. and StoweT.: 1983, ‘Alkyl Lead Pollution and Bird Mortalities on the Mersey Estuary, UK, 1979–1981’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser A) 31, 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChuppN. R. and DalkeP. D.: 1964, ‘Waterfowl Mortality in the Coeur D'Alene River Valley, Idaho’, J. Wildl. Manage. 28, 692–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeStefanoS., BrandC. J., RuschD. H., FinleyD. L. and GillespieM. M.: 1991, ‘Lead Exposure of Canada Geese of the Eastern Prairie Population’, Wild. Soc. Bull. 19, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • DieterM. P., PerryM. C. and MulhernB. M.: 1976, ‘Lead and PCBs in Canvasback Ducks: Relationship Between Enzyme Levels and Residues in Blood’, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 5, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • FransonJ. C., HaramisG. M., PerryM. C. and MooreJ. F.: 1986, ‘Blood Protoporphyrin for Detecting Lead Exposure in Canvasbacks’, in FeierabendJ. S. and RussellA. B. (eds.), Lead Poisoning in Wild Waterfowl—A Workshop, National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp. 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, M.: 1985, ‘Interpretation of Criteria Commonly Used to Determine Lead Poisoning Problem Areas’, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Fish Wildl. Leafl. 2, pp. 4

  • GrueC. E., HoffmanD. J., BeyerW. N. and FransonL. P.: 1986, ‘Lead Concentrations and Reproductive Success in European Starlings Sternus vulgaris Nesting Within Highway Roadside Verges’, Emviron. Pollut. (Ser A) 42, 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • HennyC. J., BlusL. J., HoffmanD. J., and GroveR. A.: 1994, ‘Lead in Hawks, Falcons and Owls Downstream from a Mining Site on the Coeur D'Alene River, Idaho’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 29, 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • HoffmanD. J., FransonJ. C., PattecO. H., BunckC. M. and MurrayH. C.: 1985, ‘Biochemical and Hematological Effects of Lead Ingestion in Nestling American Kestrels (Falco sparverius)’, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 80C, 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • HohmanW. L., PritchertR. D., PaceR. M., WoolingtonD. W. and HelmR.: 1990, ‘Influence of Ingested Lead on Body Mass of Wintering Canvasbacks’, J. Wildl. Manage. 54, 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • HohmanW. L., MooreJ. L. and FransonJ. C.: 1995, ‘Winter Survival of Immature Canvasbacks in Inland Louisiana’, J. Wildl. Manage. 59, 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • HuttonM.: 1980, ‘Metal Contamination of Feral Pigeons Columba livia from the London Area: Part 2-Biological Effects of Lead Exposure’, Environ. Pollut. (Ser A) 22, 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • LamolaA. A., JoselowM. and YamaneT.: 1975, ‘Zinc Protoporphyrin (ZPP): A Simple, Sensitive, Fluorometric Sereening Test for Lead Poisoning’, Clin. Chem. 21, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • LockeL. N., KerrS. M. and ZoromskiD.: 1982, ‘Lead Poisoning in Common Loons (Gavia immer)’, Avian Dis 26, 392–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • LockeL. N. and FriendM.: 1992, ‘Lead Poisoning of Avian Species Other Than Waterfowl’, in PainD. J. (ed.), Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl, IWRB Special Publication No. 16. The International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, Slimbridge, Gloueester Kingdom, pp. 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonaldJ. W., RandallC. J., RossH. M., MoonG. M. and RuthvenA. D.: 1983, ‘Lead Poisoning in Captive Birds of Prey’, Vet. Rec. 113, 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • MauserD. M., RockeT. E., MensikJ. G. and BrandC. J.: 1990, ‘Blood Lead Concentrations in Mallards from Delevan and Colusa National Wildlife Refuges’, Calif, Fish and Game 76, 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • MushakP.: 1992, ‘The Monitoring of Human Lead Exposure’, in NeedlemanH. L. (ed.), Human Lead Exposure, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, pp. 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • PiomelliS.: 1987, ‘The Diagnostic Utility of Measurements of Erythrocyte Porphyrins’, Hematol./Oncol. Clinics N. Amer. 1, 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • PokrasM. A. and ChafelR.: 1992, ‘Lead Toxicosis From Ingested Fishing Sinkers in Adult Common Loons (Gavia immer) in New England’, J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 23, 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoseoeD. E., NielsenS. W., LamolaA. A. and ZuckermanD.: 1979, ‘Simple, Quantitative Test for Erythrocytie Protoporphyrin in Lead-Poisoned Dueks’, J. Wildl. Dis. 15, 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, G. C. and Bellrose, F.C.: 1986, ‘A Review of the Problem of Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl’, Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv. Spec. Publ. 4, pp. 34.

  • SAS/STAT User's Guide: 1990, ‘The DISCRIM Procedure’, in: SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. Vol 1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, pp. 677–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • SileoL. and FeferS. I.: 1987, ‘Paint Chip Poisoning of Laysan Albatross at Midway Atoll’, J. Wildl. Dis. 23, 432–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • TaylorJ. K.: 1987, Quality Assurance of Chemical measurements, Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, MI, pp. 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of the Interior: 1986, Final Supplemental Impact Statement on the use of Lead Shot for Hunting Migratory Birds in the United States, Fes 86-16, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Washington, DC, pp. 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • WillsD. W. and GlasgowL. L.: 1964, ‘Lead Shot on Catahoula Lake and its Management Implications’, Proc. Ann. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 18, 90–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZarJ. H.: 1984, Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edn., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 156–158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The U.S. Government's right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free licence in and to any copyright is acknowledged

Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christian Franson, J., Hohman, W.L., Moore, J.L. et al. The efficacy of protoporphyrin as a predictive biomarker for lead exposure in canvasback ducks: Effect of sample storage time. Environ Monit Assess 43, 181–188 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398606

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398606

Keywords

Navigation