Summary
In 1957 all inhabitants (2,612) in a delimited geographical area, Lundby, were examined by a psychiatrist, and social factors were evaluated for each individual. During the following 15 years 58 men became alcoholics. Among the men who in 1957 were in the age group 0–14 years and belonged to a ‘gang’, the risk of becoming an alcoholic was 100-fold increased. ‘Gang’ was also an important factor in the age group 15–24 years. ‘Crisis’ was an important factor among those over 14, and ‘disintegrated environment’ in the age group 25–59 years. In the latter age group occupations such as ‘entrepreneur’, became important as a precipitating factor. ‘Married’ was the only protective factor found.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hagnell O (1966) A prospective study of the incidence of mental disorder. Scand Univ Books, Svenska Bokförlaget/Norstedts-Bonniers, Stockholm
Hagnell O, Tunving K (1972) Prevalence and nature of alcoholism in a total population. Soc Psychiatry 7:190–201
Hagnell O, Lanke J, Rorsman B, Öhman R (1986a) Predictors of alcoholism in the Lundby Study (1). Material and methods. Eur Arch Psychiatr neurol Sci 235:187–191
Lanke J (1986) On nominal and true predictive power for logistic regression models with many explanatory variables. Techn Rep Dept of Statistics, Univ of Lund
Leighton AH (1959) The Stirling County study. Volume I. My name is legion. Basic Books Inc, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study has been supported by the following grants: The Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research, No. 81/1189; The County Council of Malmöhus, 1981; The Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lund, 1983
The study has been performed with the approval of the Ethical Committee, University of Lund, and with the permit of the National Board for Control of Data processing
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagnell, O., Isberg, PE., Lanke, J. et al. Predictors of alcoholism in the Lundby study. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci 235, 197–199 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379973
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379973