Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the functional response and foraging behavior of young moose (Alces alces) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) relative to animal size and the size and distribution of browse patches. The animals were offered one, three, or nine stems of dormant red maple (Acer rubrum) in hand-assembled patches spaced 2.33, 7, 14, or 21 m apart along a runway. Moose took larger twig diameters and bites and had greater dry matter and digestible energy intake rates than did deer, but had lower cropping rates. Moose and deer travelled at similar velocities between patches and took similar numbers of bites per stem. We found that a model of intake rate, based on the mechanics of cropping, chewing, and encountering bites, effectively described the intake rate of moose and deer feeding in heterogeneous distributions of browses. As patch size and density declined, the animals walked faster between patches, cropped larger bites, and cropped more bites per stem, and hence, dry matter intake rates remained relatively constant. As is characteristic of many hardwood browse stems, however, potential digestible energy concentration of the red maple stems declined as the size and number of bites removed (i.e., stem diameter at point of clipping) by the animals increased. Therefore, the digestible energy content of the diet declined with decreasing patch size and density. Time spent foraging within a patch increased as patch size increased and as distance between patches increased, which qualitatively supported the marginal-value theorem. However, actual patch residence times for deer and moose exceeded those predicted by the marginal-value theorem (MVT) by approximately 250%. The difference between actual and predicted residence time may have been a result of (1) an unknown or complex gain function, (2) the artificial conditions of the experiments, or (3) assumptions of MVT that do not apply to herbivores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arditi R, Dacorogna B (1988) Optimal foraging on arbitrary food distributions and the definition of habitat patches. Am Nat 131:837–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Åström M, Lundberg P, Danell K (1990) Partial prey consumption by browsers: trees as patches. J Anim Ecol 59:287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1986) Optimal foraging and community structure, implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores. Oecologia 70:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Black JL, Kenney PA (1984) Factors affecting diet selection by sheep. II. Height and density of pasture. Aust J Agric Res 35:551–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Gillingham MP (1985) Foraging behavior: dynamics of dining out. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 53–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlison AJ, Hodgson J, Illius AW (1991) Sward canopy structure and the bite dimension and bite weight of grazing sheep. Grass For Sci 46:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SM, Owen-Smith N (1986) Effects of plant spinescence on large mammalian herbivores. Oecologia 68:446–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie RJ (1977) Optimal foraging of the great tit (Parus major). Nature 268:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Demment MW, Van Soest PJ (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant herbivores. Am Nat 125:641–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham MP, Bunnell FL (1989) Effects of learning on food selection and searching behaviour of deer. Can J Zool 67:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering HK Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis (Agriculture Handbook No. 379). US Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross JE, Shipley LA, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE, Wunder BA (1993) Foraging by herbivores in food-concentrated patches: tests of a mechanistic model of functional response. Ecology 74:778–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley TA (1984) Habitat patches and their selection by wapiti and black-tailed deer in a coastal montane coniferous forest. J Appl Ecol 21:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjälten J, Danell K, Lundberg P (1993) Herbivore avoidance by association: vole and hare utilization of woody plants. Oikos 68:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CM (1981) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: hunting by expectation. Anim Behav 29:1166–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert ME (1987) The effect of diet on energy partitioning in moose. MS Thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks

  • Jiang Z, Hudson RJ (1993) Optimal grazing of wapiti (Cervus elaphus) on grassland: patch and feeding station departure rules. Evol Ecol 7:488–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Laca EA, Demment M (1991) Herbivory: the dilemma of foraging in a spatially heterogeneous food environment. In: Palo T, Robbins CT (eds) Plant defenses against mammalian herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Laca EA, Distel RA, Griggs TC, Deo GP, Demment MW (1993) Field test of optimal foraging with cattle: the marginal value theorem successfully predicts patch selection and utilisation. In: XVII Proc Int Grassland Congr New Zealand and Queensland, February 1993, pp 709–710

  • Langvatn R, Hanley TA (1993) Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency: an experiment. Oecologia 95:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentner M, Bishop T (1986) Experimental design and analysis. Valley, Blacksburg, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg P (1988) Functional response of a small mammalian herbivore: the disc equation revisited. J Anim Ecol 57:999–1006

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould ED, Robbins CT (1981) Evaluation of detergent analysis in estimating nutritional value of browse. J Wildl Manage 45:937–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Palo RT, Bergström R, Danell K (1992) Digestibility, distribution of phenols, and fiber at different twig diameters of birch in winter. Implication for browsers. Oikos 65:450–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning PS, Parsons AJ, Orr RJ, Treacher TT (1991) Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking. Grass For Sci 46:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1989) Optimal foraging by nectarivores: a test of the marginal-value theorem. Am Nat 134:51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Risenhoover KL (1987) Winter foraging strategies of moose in subarctic and boreal forest habitats. PhD diss, Michigan Technical University, Houghton

  • Robbins CT, Mole S, Hagerman AE, Hanley TA (1987) Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in dry matter digestibility. Ecology 68:1606–1615

    Google Scholar 

  • S≸ther BE, Andersen R (1990) Resource limitations in a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces: ecological constraints on behavioural decisions. Can J Zool 68:993–999

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CC, Hubbert ME, Franzmann AW (1988) Energy requirements of adult moose for winter maintenance. J Wildl Manage 52:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CC, Regelin WL, Franzmann AW (1988) Estimates of digestibility of birch, willow, and aspen mixtures in moose. J Wildl Manage 52:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, Swift DM (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37:789–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Spalinger DE (1992) Mechanics of browsing in dense food patches: effects of plant and animal morphology on intake rate. Can J Zool 70:1743–1752

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley LA, Gross JE, Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT, Wunder BA (1994) The scaling of intake rate in mammalian herbivores. Am Nat 143:1055–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively LA (1989) Mechanics of foraging behavior of boreal herbivores. MS thesis, University of Maine, Orono

  • Spalinger DE, Hanley TA, Robbins CT (1988) Analysis of the functional response in foraging in the sitka black-tailed deer. Ecology 69:1166–1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT (1992) Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response. Am Nat 140:325–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobbs TH (1973) The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pastures. I. Variation in the bite size of grazing cattle. Aust J Agric Res 24:809–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivås HJ, S≸ther BE (1987) Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces and its food resources: an experimental study of winter foraging behaviour in relation to browse availability. J Anim Ecol 56:509–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivås HJ, S≸ther BE, Andersen R (1991) Optimal twig-size selection of a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces: implications for plant-herbivore interactions. J Anim Ecol 60:395–408

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. A. Shipley

    Present address: Department of Biology, Frostburg State University, 21532, Frostburg, MD, USA

  2. D. E. Spalinger

    Present address: Division of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska, 94508, Anchorage, AK, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Wildlife Management, University of Maine, 04469, Orono, ME, USA

    L. A. Shipley & D. E. Spalinger

Authors
  1. L. A. Shipley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. E. Spalinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shipley, L.A., Spalinger, D.E. Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer. Oecologia 104, 112–121 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365569

Key words

Search

Navigation