Abstract
Tissues of 338 marine macrophytes comprising 103 species, collected from the Atlantic, Mediterranean, South China, and Caribbean Seas, and encompassing a broad range in thallus form and pigmentation, were examined to quantify the importance of phylogenetic differences, spectral variability, and plant form and pigment content to account for differences in the absorption of light by marine macrophytes. Phylogenetic differences accounted for 2.5% of the variance in absorption observed, non-phylogenetic spectral differences being much larger (26%). Differences among individual specimens were much larger (72%), absorption at 675 nm increasing non-linearly as chlorophyll a density1/2, indicating that light absorption increases with increasing chlorophyll a density following a law of diminishing returns, as predicted by theory. The energy return per unit tissue produced (i.e. light absorption per unit plant weight) increased linearly with increasing chlorophyll a concentration. However, the light absorbed per unit weight decreased, for a given chlorophyll a concentration, as plant thickness increased. This indicates that while increasing thickness may increase chlorphyll a density and, hence, the light absorbed by marine macrophyte thalli, this strategy represents a burden limiting potential carbon turnover and plant growth. These results indicate that the diverse repertoire of light absorption by marine macrophytes can be adequately modeled as a continuum, dependent on plant thickness and pigment content, independent of phylogenetic differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antia NJ, McAllister CD, Parsons TR, Stephens K, Strickland JDH (1963) Further measurements of primary production using a large volume plastic sphere. Limnol Oceanogr 8: 166–183
Agustí S (1991a) Allometric scaling of light absorption and scattering by phytoplankton cells. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48: 763–767
Agustí S (1991b) Light environment within dense algal populations: cell size influences on self-shading. J Plankton Res 13: 863–871
Agustí S, Phlips EJ (1992) Light absorption by cyanobacteria: Implications of the colonial growth form. Limnol Oceanogr 37: 434–441
Agustí S, Enríquez S, Frost-Christensen H, Sand-Jensen K, Duarte CM (1994) Light harvesting among photosynthetic organisms. Funct Ecol vol 8 (in press)
Charpy-Roubaud C, Sournia A (1990) The comparative estimation of phytoplanktonic, microphytobenthic, and macrophytobenthic primary production in the ocean. Mar Microbiol Food Webs 4: 31–57
Clayton RK (1973a) Light and living matter, vol 1: the physical part. McGraw-Hill, Montreal
Clayton RK (1973b) Light and living matter, vol 2: the physical part. McGraw-Hill, Montreal
Dnnison WC (1990) Chlorophyll content., In: Phillips RC, McRoy P (eds) Seagrass research methods. Unesco, Paris, pp 83–85
Draper NR, Smith H (1966) Applied regression analysis. Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Dring MJ (1981) Photosynthesis and development of marine macrophytes in natural light spectra, In: Smith H (ed) Plants and the daylight spectrum. Academic Press, pp 297–314
Duysens LMN (1956) The flattening effect of the absorption spectra of suspensions as compared to that of solutions. Biochem Biophys Acta 19: 1–12
Engelman TW (1883) Farbe und Assimilation. Bot Zeit 41: 1–13
Enríquez S, Agustí S, Duarte CM (1992) Light absorption by seagrass (Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile) leaves. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 86: 201–204
Frost-Christensen H, Sand-Jensen K (1992) The quantum efficiency of photosynthesis in macroalgae and submerged angiosperms. Oecologia 91: 377–384
Hay ME (1986) Functional geometry of seaweeds: ecological consequences of thallus layering and shape in contrasting light environments. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 635–666
Kirk JTO (1983) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lang JC (1974) Biological zonation at the base of a reef. Am Sci 62: 271–281
Larkum AWD, Drew EA, Crossett RN (1967) The vertical distribution of attached marine algae in Malta. J Ecol 55: 361–371
Littler MM (1980) Morphological form and photosynthetic performances of marine macroalgae: test of a functional/form hypothesis. Bot Mar 23: 161–165
Littler MM, Arnold KE (1982) Primary productivity of marine macroalgal functional-form groups from southwestern North America. J Phycol 18: 307–311
Littler MM, Littler DS (1980) The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine macroalgae: field and laboratory test of a functional form model. Am Nat 116: 25–44
Lobban CS, Harrison PJ, Duncan MJ (1985) The physiological ecology of seaweeds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 239
Lüning K, Dring MJ (1985) Action spectra and spectral quantum yield of photosynthesis in marine macroalgae with thin and thick thalli. Mar Biol 87: 119–129
Markager S (1993) Light absorption and quantum yield for growth in five species of marine macroalgae. J Phycol 29: 54–63
Markager S, Sand-Jensen K (1992) Light requirements and depht zonation of marine macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 88: 83–92
Morel A, Bricaud A (1981) Theoretical results concerning light absorption in a discrete medium, and application to specific absorption of phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res 28: 1375–1393
Parsons TR, Stephens K, Strickland JDH (1961) On the chemical composition of eleven species of marine phytoplankters. J Fish Res Bd Can 18: 1001–1012
Ramus J (1978) Seaweed anatomy and photosynthetic performance: The ecological significance of líght guides, heterogeous absorption and multiple scatter. J Phycol 14: 352–362
Ramus J (1983) A physiological test of the theory of complementary chromatic adaptation. II Brown, green and red seaweeds. J Phycol 19: 173–178
Ramus J (1990) A form-function analysis of photon capture for seaweeds. Hydrobiologia 204/205: 65–71
Ramus J, Meer JP van der (1983) A physiological test of the theory of complementary chromatic adaptation. I Color mutants of a red seaweed. J Phycol 19: 86–91
Ramus J, Lemons F, Zimmerman C (1977) Adaptation of light-harvesting pigments to downwelling light and to consequent photosynthetic performance of the eulittoral rockweeds Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesuculosus. Mar Biol 24: 293–303
Rhee C, Brigg WR (1977) Some responses of Chondrus crispus to light I. Pigment changes in the natural habitat. Bot Gaz 138: 123–128
Ricketts TR (1966) On the chemical composition of some unicellular algae. Phytochemistry 5: 67–76
Shibata K (1959) Spectrophotometry of translucence biological materials — opal glass transmission method. Meth Biochem Anal 7: 77–109
Smith SV (1981) Marine macrophytes as a global carbon sink. nature 211: 838–840
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometria. H Blume, Madrid
Stramski D (1990) Artifacts in measuring absorption spectra of phytoplankton collected on a filter. Limnol Oceanogr 35: 1804–1809
Waaland JR, Waaland SD, Bates G (1974) Chloroplast structure and pigment composition in the red alga Griffithsia pacifica: regulation by light intensity. J Phycol 10: 193–199
Yokum CS, Blinks LR (1958) Photosynthetic efficiency of marine plants. J Gen Physiol 38: 1–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Enríquez, S., Agustí, S. & Duarte, C.M. Light absorption by marine macrophytes. Oecologia 98, 121–129 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341462
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341462