Abstract
By irradiation of the tunneling junction of a scanning tunneling microscope with intensity-modulated laser light a gap-width modulation due to thermal expansion of tip and sample was produced. Photothermal images were obtained by spatial mapping of the resulting modulation of the tunneling current or its logarithm. The various mechanisms responsible for the observed contrast are discussed quantitatively. In case of a highly corrugated gold film on mica the contrast arises mainly from either the current variations caused by the non-zero reaction time of the current control loop or from a geometry factor. In both cases the images reflect certain properties of the sample topography. On the other hand, for a liquid-crystal film adsorbed on graphite a contrast on a molecular scale was found which is attributed to variations of the effective barrier height.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.G. Simmons: J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793 (1963)
N.M. Amer, A. Skumanich, D. Ripple: Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 137 (1986)
G.F.A. van de Walle, H. van Kempen, P. Wyder, P. Davidsson: Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 22 (1987)
M. Völcker, W. Krieger, H. Walther: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1717 (1991)
A.A. Lucas, P.H. Cutler, T.E. Feuchtwang, T.T. Tsong, T.E. Sullivan, Y. Kuk, H. Nguyen, P.J. Silverman: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 461 (1988)
R.J. Hamers, K. Markert: Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1051 (1990)
Y. Kuk, R.S. Becker, P.J. Silverman, G.P. Kochanski: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 456 (1990)
G.P. Kochanski, R.F. Bell: Surf. Sci. Lett. 273, L435 (1992)
S. Grafström, J. Kowalski, R. Neumann, O. Probst, M. Wörtge: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 568 (1991)
J.M.R. Weaver, L.M. Walpita, H.K. Wickramasinghe: Nature 342, 783 (1989)
A rough estimate of the temperature modulation can be obtained by calculating the low-frequency limit. Since, generally, the tip contribution prevails, the temperature modulation can be calculated from the thermal resistance of the tip assuming that its foremost part has a conical shape and neglecting the thermal resistance of the shank: ΔT(ω → 0)≈2P/(λπR focustan2ϕ), where λ denotes the thermal conductivity, R focus the radius of the laser spot, 2ϕ the aperture angle of the tip, and P the absorbed laser power. For typical values of λ=31 W/(m K), R focus=10 μm, ϕ=10°, and P=0.1 mW one obtains ΔT≈7 K. This is rather an upper limit since for high modulation frequencies the temperature modulation drops considerably
S. Grafström, J. Kowalski, R. Neumann: Meas. Sci. Technol. 1, 139 (1990)
S. Grafström, J. Kowalski, R. Neumann, O. Probst, M. Wörtge: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 357 (1990)
Controlled geometry Pt/Ir STM tips, Materials Analytical Services, Raleigh, NC, USA
J.M. Gómez-Rodríguez, J. Gómes-Herrero, A.M. Baró: Surf. Sci. 220, 152 (1989)
G. Binnig, H. Rohrer: IBM J. Res. Develop. 30, 355 (1986)
J.S. Foster, J.E. Frommer: Nature 333, 542 (1988)
D.P.E. Smith, J.K.H. Hörber, G. Binnig, H. Nejoh: Nature 344, 641 (1990)
J.H. Coombs, J.B. Pethica: IBM J. Res. Develop. 30, 455 (1986)
H.J. Mamin, E. Ganz, D.W. Abraham, R.E. Thomson, J. Clarke: Phys. Rev. B 34, 9015 (1986)
J.K. Spong, H.A. Mizes, L.J. LaComb Jr, M.M. Dovek, J.E. Frommer, J.S. Foster: Nature 338, 137 (1989)
R. García-García, J.J. Sánez: Surf. Sci. 251/252, 223 (1991)
H. Kemmer, S. Grafström, M. Neitzert, M. Wörtge, R. Neumann, C. Trautmann, J. Vetter, N. Angert: Ultramicroscopy 42–44, 1345 (1992)